Down 6,293 this week

Solar Attack (2006)
"Solar Strike" (original title)

TV Movie  -   -  Action | Sci-Fi | Thriller  -  25 May 2006 (Canada)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 4.1/10 from 681 users  
Reviews: 21 user | 7 critic

Add a Plot


0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 288 titles
created 08 May 2011
a list of 2008 titles
created 24 Jun 2012
a list of 1469 titles
created 01 Nov 2012
a list of 53 titles
created 07 Jan 2013
a list of 5996 titles
created 10 months ago

Related Items

Search for "Solar Strike" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Solar Attack (TV Movie 2006)

Solar Attack (TV Movie 2006) on IMDb 4.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Solar Attack.


Cast overview, first billed only:
Brad Stamp
Craig Eldridge ...
Jim Leeburg
Joe Aguilar
Admiral Lawrence
Colonel Alby
Damir Andrei ...
Russian President Yuri Ilyushin
Captain Misha Gregorovitch
Genadijs Dolganovs ...
Lt. Troiska
Russian Crew Member
Ronn Sarosiak ...
Captain Wade
Lt. Copeland


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


Prepare for the Apocalypse...

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG for some disaster peril and mild language | See all certifications »




Release Date:

25 May 2006 (Canada)  »

Also Known As:

Solar Attack  »

Filming Locations:


Box Office


CAD 2,000,000 (estimated)

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs




See  »

Did You Know?


Methane does not "burn" in 80 miles altitude (almost vacuum, partial pressure of oxygen is completely insufficient). See more »


Admiral Lawrence: Well, I guess we'd better get ready for hell on earth.
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Another techno-thriller handicapped by "Science Lite"
18 August 2007 | by (Earth) – See all my reviews

Coronal mass ejections from the Sun are the gimmick the makers of this film use to get you in front of the TV (or worse, inside a theater where you may have paid to see it).

Extinction level events are the hack screenwriter's new refuge from the demands of serious drama and this is no different - except that coronal mass ejections are much less plausible as an extinction-level event than, say, impact by a large asteroid.

Apart from this most obvious flaw in the movie, we're also expected to believe that these coronal mass ejections somehow keep satellites from burning up on re-entry, so they can take out streets full of people (for example, if the Soviet spy satellite which scattered itself all over the Yukon Territory back in the late 1970s had done so over downtown Detroit instead, the carnage could have been impressive).

In this film, methane (and not carbon dioxide) is contaminating the upper atmosphere. Pockets of methane unaccountably ignite, causing atmospheric chaos for no real reason. And according to this movie, we can also dispense with all the money we're spending on ballistic missile defense - F-15 fighter planes can handle terminal stage ballistic intercepts just fine. Has Boeing been holding out on us?

I keep harping on the problems created by stupidity in plot details because they damage willing suspension of disbelief by the audience and make the movie hard to enjoy. The factual errors in the plot of "Solar Strike" aren't points on which reasonable men of science can disagree, they're a series of clinkers which anyone who passed high school chemistry (or even "general science") will have trouble setting aside in order to enjoy the film.

And the film needs the help. We enjoy "Society of Extraordinary Gentlemen" and "Van Helsing" despite the campy Victorian "science" because the actors and screenwriters do a good job and the story recruits the audience as a willing conspirator.

The writers and director don't get Lou Gossett and the other "name" actors close enough to the goal to score. Even Lou Gossett can't sound intelligent when the lines he has to deliver are palpably foolish. There's nothing in this plot, the characterizations, or the dialogue to entertain.

This is a dismal, dismal, dismal waste of the viewer's time. You have to wonder if Syfy Network shows garbage like this because of a special dumb movie discount or something.

20 of 28 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Sci-fi nonsense. willowfox
Not possible realvek
does he saving world again? ugurkoch
US release date kickboxer2003
Quick Question ruagoodwitchorabadwitch
music score snow_crazed
Discuss Solar Attack (2006) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: