MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 7,476 this week

Seamless (2005)

4.9
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 4.9/10 from 112 users   Metascore: 52/100
Reviews: 7 user | 4 critic | 5 from Metacritic.com

A look at what it takes for young designers to make it in the fashion world.

Director:

(as Doug Keeve)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 77 images
created 30 Nov 2011
 
a list of 23 titles
created 14 Jun 2012
 
a list of 618 titles
created 23 Jun 2012
 
a list of 120 titles
created 14 Dec 2012
 
a list of 35 titles
created 2 weeks ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Seamless (2005)

Seamless (2005) on IMDb 4.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Seamless.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Peter Arnold ...
Himself - Judge
...
Himself
Shawn Carter ...
Himself
Edmundo Castillo ...
Himself - Designer
...
Herself - Designer
Michael Colovos ...
Himself - Designer
Nicole Colovos ...
Herself - Designer
...
Himself (as Sean 'P. Diddy' Combs)
...
Herself
Robert Duffy ...
Himself - Judge
Arthur Elgort ...
Himself
...
Herself
Bridget Foley ...
Herself
Julie Gilhart ...
Herself - Judge
Cindy Greene ...
Herself - Designer
Edit

Storyline

A look at what it takes for young designers to make it in the fashion world.

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

fashion

Genres:

Documentary

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

26 April 2005 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Soundtracks

I Want to Live
Written by John Terlesky
Performed by The Original Sins
Produced by Glenn Morrow
Published by OriginalsinSongs (BMI)
Courtesy of Bar/None Records
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
An interesting look into the world of fashion.
8 June 2005 | by (Newport, Rhode Island, USA) – See all my reviews

I just saw this documentary film at the Newport International Film Festival last night (June 7, 2005) and have to say that I liked it a lot.

This is a film about how the fashion industry (which included Vogue magazine), in order to encourage new and upcoming fashion talent, create a fund to provide incentive capital to a designer who has, not just well thought out clothes, but also has the business sense to survive. It is a tale about how the fashion industry realizes that there doesn't seem to be anyone replacing the likes of well known but aging designers and how they realize that something needs to be done to encourage growth. It is also a look about how terribly difficult it is to take a business idea, especially in the fashion industry, and make it grow.

A panel of judges is formed to screen approximately 175 potential candidates. The movie starts at the point where there are 10 semi-finalists. The movie follows three of these semi-finalists from visits to their workshop(s), putting on a public fashion show, putting on another "show" in front of the judges with the designers choice of 5 of his/hers best outfits (one finalist, who was not one of the three filmed, only made shoes, another made jewelry), plus grill sessions concerning business sense, etc. At the end of the movie there is a banquet where the top prize is awarded. With only one winner, you, as an audience, have been so well manipulated by the film that you feel almost instant grief for those others who didn't win. It is a well told story! To give you an idea as to how well, considering I don't follow the glitterati of the world (especially in fashion), I came away from the movie thinking how I would like to get a tuxedo from this one designer.

So why did I rate this a 7? In short: cinematography and editing. After the screening last night I came close to asking the director if the budget had been so tight that he couldn't afford a tripod. This was because the entire movie (at least it SEEMED like the entire movie) was one jerky scene after another (especially in the public fashion show). In a few other scenes the camera was not focused on the subjects but, rather, on the wall beyond the subjects. This, to me, was quite irritating because I was not allowed enough opportunity to appreciate and evaluate the clothes that were so vital to the survival of the contestants. I realize that the hand-held camera technique is supposed to lend an air of authenticity to the film. In my opinion, however, it should only be used when a) it is absolutely mandatory (filming in a white-water raft or in very close quarters with a moving subject, for example), b) when you can't afford SteadiCam equipment and/or operators, or c) when you can't afford a tripod. A good example of a good balance between hand-held technique and traditional tripod/dolly/etc. methods is "Day For Night" (La Nuit Americaine) by Francois Truffaut.

And as for editing, is it really too much to ask to have a minimum cut of 3 seconds instead of 3 frames? While this complaint did not happen much (fortunately), when it did occur during the public fashion show I felt cheated because I was not allowed the opportunity to make my own evaluations of what had been created by these people the movie was trying to get us to embrace. The only time I have seen quick cuts used effectively is for flashback sequences, otherwise I find it irritating, as it was when I saw "Moulin Rouge".

Don't get me wrong, I liked the movie well enough to want to see it again. Only next time I'm going to wear glasses with self-leveling electronics in them.


2 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Track listing NostalgicNocturne
Discuss Seamless (2005) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page