| Page 1 of 22: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 213 reviews in total |
129 out of 169 people found the following review useful:
It wasn't that bad!, 7 January 2007
![]()
Author:
iheart_ny from United States
I just saw this and I had extraordinarily low expectations, but I
actually enjoyed it a lot more than I thought it would.
I thought the "Scarier than Hostel!" bit that they were using to
promote it was corny and dumb, because a lot of people, including me,
hated Hostel. But Turistas is better viewed when you're not expecting
it to be that great. There were a few parts I thought were somewhat
dumb, but the acting isn't bad. All of the actors are in their late
20's to early 30's, which I thought was good because I did NOT want to
see another dumb teen-driven horror flick. But I don't see Turistas as
a horror movie. It was a thriller that was actually somewhat scary,
which is something that suspense movies these days lack terribly.
The parts I didn't like about it were overlookable. Like in the
underwater scenes, I thought the acting could have been a little
better, but in the long run, Turistas isn't a failure. I think there
are much worse movies that could be on the Bottom 100, like Lady In The
Water, for example. So, if Turistas is showing now at a 2nd-run house
near you, you should go see it. Hopefully you won't hate it as much as
typical IMDb folk do. They're all idiots, anyway.
102 out of 142 people found the following review useful:
Fun, 8 January 2007
![]()
Author:
McBitter from United States
'Turistas' was a fun horror flick with a 'Hostel' like plot. The
characters were pretty likable along with the film itself. It had some
good gory scenes which included a disturbing open surgery scene.
I am really confused about why people hated this film so much. When I
saw this with a friend, we were both expecting a stupid b flick with
cheesy acting. We were both surprised at the end, it didn't entirely
suck! It had an OK script, OK actors, cool scenes, a fun plot, and
gruesome gore. I admit, it wasn't a masterpiece but it was not
horrible! I have seen much, much, much worse!
Something that does tick me off about this films bad ratings is that
the Brazilians are rating it bad because they think this film will
lower their tourist numbers. They are wrong, people still go to the
beach(Jaws) and still go to European countries(Hostel). Its just a
horror flick.
So you should go see this if you like fun B horror flicks.
106 out of 154 people found the following review useful:
Not as bad as people make it out to be!, 8 December 2006
![]()
Author:
lindz_ox from Canada
I really came into this movie hardly knowing a thing about it except
I've heard a million people telling me it was terrible and the 3.
something rating on here made me think this was going to be laughably
bad but it really wasn't.
I'm surprised this movie didn't do better! I mean its nothing more than
average even know I thought it did have some originality. Any average
horror/slasher fan would probably enjoy it, it's no worse than wolf
creek or hostel. The film did a good job of setting their tones, they
did a good job at pacing and they managed to do a good job with the
intensity. The camera works a little frustrating at first but you get
used to it and it ends up working for the film. The deaths and special
effects aren't the most amazing at looking realistic but they did a
good job with their budget. I also really liked how they developed the
characters in this but they could use less gore, I mean I know thats
whats getting the audience for some reason lately but it didn't feel
necessary and they kept a gross scene on for just too long.
Overall, Don't get me wrong this movie isn't excellent but its not as
bad as everyones saying it is. If you liked wolf creek, hostel, into
the blue, or the descent then you'll probably enjoy this, it's worth a
look.
68 out of 84 people found the following review useful:
Good Night, Cinderella, 20 June 2007
![]()
Author:
Claudio Carvalho from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
While traveling on vacation through the country of Northeastern of
Brazil by bus, the American Alex Trubituan (Josh Duhamel), his sister
Bea Tribituan (Olivia Wilde) and their friend Amy Harrington (Beau
Garrett) meet the also foreigners Pru Stagler (Melissa George), Finn
Davies (Desmond Askew) and Liam Kuller (Max Brown) after an accident
with their bus. They follow a track through the woods and find a hidden
paradisiacal beach. They decide to stay in the place drinking beer and
dancing funk and parting with the locals and they meet the amicable
Brazilian teenager Kiko (Agles Steib). They are drugged with "Bom Dia,
Cinderela" (translation: Good Morning, Cinderella - a trick used by
smalltime crooks to steal naive people) and when they wake up, they are
practically naked, with all their belongings, clothes, money, jewels,
passports, backpacks etc. stolen. They walk to a small village trying
to find a police station, they get into trouble with the dwellers and
they are helped by their acquaintance Kiko, who leads them to his
uncle's isolated well-equipped cabin in the woods to wait for the next
bus two days later. Along the night, Kiko's "uncle" arrives with his
friends and the group discloses the sinister intentions of the
newcomers.
When "Turistas" was released, there was a huge campaign in Brazil to
boycott this movie because it showed a bad, distorted and stereotyped
image of Brazil. I have just seen this film on DVD, I am Brazilian, and
I totally disagree with this position. First of all, "Turistas" is
fictional, based on the urban legend or reality of traffic of human
organs, and the story takes place in Brazil the same way this theme is
approached in London in Stephen Frears's "Dirty Pretty Things" or the
violent "Hostel" is in Slovakia. Second, director John Stockwell seems
to be absolutely familiarized with the usual behavior of simple people
from the Northeastern of Brazil and the way of thinking of average
tourists. They give hospitality to tourists, they are friendly, they
like to party and dance, the prices of food and lodging are very low,
the bus drivers do not respect the traffic laws, even the use of drug
to rob incautious tourists, therefore he discloses the reality in a
magnificent landscape. Further, there are many funny lines in
Portuguese. The sinister theme has a good and logical approach and the
performances are great and realistic, only the conclusion is weak in
the plot. Of course the fate of the backpackers is fictional and the
possibility of an incident like this happen is practically null.
Welcome to Brazil, actually a nice place to be visited. My vote is
seven.
Title (Brazil): "Turistas" ("Tourists")
127 out of 214 people found the following review useful:
Go home....before you buy your ticket, 29 November 2006
![]()
Author:
NateF88 from IL
Without making this review to long, I just want to say that Turistas
starts off well, and then goes way downhill once the "horror" begins.
The opening half of the movie is very well developed. It draws out it's
characters well, sets up moments of suspense for the horrors that will
come, and keeps the viewer interested due to it's beautiful
cinematography.
Once the terror and violence actually begin (which doesn't happen until
the last third of the movie no less) it goes way downhill. For one, it
was marketed as a torture movie, but there is barely any of it! Sure,
there's a brutal killing here and there, but when it came to gore, this
film was very tame. Second, the cinematography in during the night
scenes was awful,with the chase scenes and violence barely viewable.
You could not tell what was happening on screen, and all of the viewers
of the film were lost with what was going on. Third, the last third was
extremely predictable. You could tell who was going to die and when.
The main villain (who ironically looks like the President of Iran) is
not well drawn out, and the "climax" of the film is pitiful.
There is however, fine acting jobs done by all involved, and a
particular death scene that made me squirm in my seat due to its
brutality and intensity. When the chase scenes and violence were
actually viewable (of which it rarely was) it actually was pretty
intense. However, the actual deaths were not (save one or two), and the
dumb decisions made by all of the characters may be the stupidest yet
to grace the screen this year.
It's sad. Turistas had potential. It started off great, but just went
in the wrong direction I guess. I have never seen a movie that fell so
much on its rear.
57 out of 82 people found the following review useful:
Why the bad rating ???, 2 July 2007
![]()
Author:
Ronald_James_Corbin from Canada
I almost was not going to see this movie because it was giving such a
bad rating by so many.
I don't know why though. I watched the movie and it was very very good.
It had a great story line that was believable and made it more creepy.
When something exciting was not happening it had great visuals of
Brazil. It had some intense scenes also. It also had a lot of shocking
parts u would not expect. I really liked this movie. Better then hostel
definitely.
It shouldn't have a bad rating. At least should have a 7 or 8. Worth
watching.
42 out of 53 people found the following review useful:
Trouble in Paradise, 18 January 2007
![]()
Author:
Henrik Ohlin from Sweden
I saw this movie despite it's bad rating, and I must say that it wasn't at all bad. Good production values, great soundtrack and a somewhat believable story. I think a lot of people would've found it better had they not expected a horror movie. Sure there's blood and guts in it, but it's more of an adventure-movie in the sense that the good-guys, bad-guys ratio evens things up. What it does lack however is a satisfying ending and a subplot that would given an added depth to the characters. I still think it deserves a 5 rating as it's different than most movies, it doesn't follow the standard 'stupid-people walking straight into doom' recipe. It's beautifully shot at locations that I'd love to see in real life. It did get a notch or two higher for the effort. If the last 15 minutes of it had been a bit more scary and gruesome I'd definitely would've given it a 6 or a 7. If you are after a Texas Chainsaw-kind of deal you are most likely looking in the wrong direction, but if you are not, then this might tickle the fright in you just enough for it to be worth renting.
48 out of 70 people found the following review useful:
Exotic horror pic that emphasizes suspense, 14 November 2006
![]()
Author:
fertilecelluloid from Mountains of Madness
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
John Stockwell's "Turistas" mines territory recently visited by "Hostel", but it substitutes Brazil for Europe. A bunch of young tourists from Australia, the UK, and the US, are left high and dry when the bus they are traveling in is destroyed and their personal effects are stolen. There are no points for guessing what happens next. There are elements of "Dr. Butcher MD" in this beautifully shot horror pic that lavishes attention on the hot bodies of its female stars. It is not as violent or as gory as the recent "Texas Chainhsaw Massacre - The Beginning", but director Stockwell (who played Arnie's best friend in "Christine") does a great job of building the suspense. By intercutting the situation the turistas are facing with what the bad guys are up to, Stockwell creates an atmosphere of impending dread and hopelessness. There is a gory scene in which a stomach is cut open in graphic detail ("Men Behind The Sun"-style) and organs are removed, and there are also a couple of vicious assaults, but the name of the game here is tension. Some of the underwater material is gorgeous to look at, recalling the mood of Argento's "Inferno", and the jungle setting is unsettling. Although the film runs out of steam towards the end and spends a bit too much time underwater, it is, nevertheless, a very decent horror pic set in an exotic milieu and enhanced by some gruesome, realistic scenes of violence.
30 out of 38 people found the following review useful:
I've seen a lot worse, 18 April 2007
![]()
Author:
movieman_kev from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
A group of backpacking tourists are vacationing in Brazil. Their bus
breaks down and they're greeted by some very unpleasant locals. Even
though the acting wasn't up to par and the story was trite, unoriginal,
and cliché, there was a few scenes that work for this movie. The
Underwater cavern being the most obvious standout. I also really liked
that the ending didn't go the extremely over-done route of leaving it
open for a sequel (which is,by the way, the MOST overused idea in all
of Horrordom) The movie doesn't stand up to multiple viewings at all.
But it was a suitably enough rainy day time-waster. Not as bad as it
you'd think.
My Grade: C
Eye Candy: Lucy Ramos shows T&A; and Beau Garrett gets topless
45 out of 74 people found the following review useful:
Surprisingly good, 14 March 2007
![]()
Author:
maxcottle-1 from United Kingdom
I agree with McGreysFan, this film is much better than you would
expect. It is not a horror it is a thriller and I suspect that the
reason it has been rated so low is that the people voting on it are of
the 18-24 demographic.
this is a good thriller, not a slash and splatter horror, which I am
not in to really because they are always a bunch of dumb teens running
around and screaming. Terrible acting with no real story.
This film had good acting, a good story and I enjoyed it, I almost
didn't watch it because I was put off by the IMDb rating of it. One
thing though, the English guy Finn I think his name was, man did he do
my head in, I am English and I found him incredibly annoying.
As a comparison I would say this film was much better than Hostel which
I would give a 2 this I would rate as a five. It was an adult film. A
decent thriller with which I was pleasantly surprised.
| Page 1 of 22: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |