11 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :- To be honest . I wasn't really expecting something like this, 14 April 2007
Author:
K_Todorov from Bulgaria
A name like "Samurai Commando Mission 1549" does create an obvious
expectation of a movie produced with cheese, written with cheese and
directed with cheese. By cheese I of course mean low budget b-movie
quality. Strangely enough "Samurai Commando" is nothing like that. And
even stranger, it's actually pretty good, considering you value
straight entertainment dazzled with a light but pleasant plot about
time travel. I know I liked it.
"Samurai Commando Mission 1549" is the second movie adaptation of a
novel written by Ryo Hanmura. The first being the campy and fun, 1979
"G.I. Samurai". Starring cult favorite action star Sonny Chiba.
Notably, the two movies have very little in common besides their basic
plot-outline. A small squadron of the Japanese Self Deffense Force
including vehicles are sucked into a time-warp and find themselves in
the middle of the Senguko period. A very bloody era when Japan was torn
by countless battles between power-hungry warlords. Seeing as they have
no apparent way of returning home the men of the SDF taskforce decide
to do their best and adapt to this time. And by adapt I do mean exploit
their superior military equipment so that they could dominate Japan.
This is as close as the two adaptation get from one another. "Samurai
Commando Mission 1549"'s main group of characters are actually the
rescue team sent to find/stop the missing squadron. It seems their
tinkering in the past has made the present a bit more unstable and it's
up to these men (and woman) to save the modern world from disappearing.
Granted, yes the story does get a bit melodramatic at some points, but
is still surprisingly well written. Plot holes are kept to a minimum,
characters are good, nothing all that impressive but not detracting
either. Their motivations are well fleshed-out, dialog is acceptable,
lack of backgrounds does hurt the overall quality though. Also one
other essential ingredient is missing, Sonny Chiba. Not that the actors
here did their jobs bad or anything, but the absence of Chiba's
charismatic presence becomes quite evident once you've seen the
original movie.
Another surprise was the quality of the visual effects. Which I
honestly thought, would've come straight from a 80s sci-fi flick.
Costumes looked really good and authentic. Some pretty good CGI
animation was used for some of the more complex scenes involving
vehicles and explosions. And talking about explosions, that is
something we have plenty of in "Samurai Commando Mission 1549" and
director Masaaki Tezuka does a good job at distributing it in equal
measures throughout the movie, while keeping the best for last. There
is some blood here, but no vast amounts of gore or arterial fountains
(sorry guys). Action scenes are decently directed, choreography is good
but not phenomenal.
"Samurai Commando Mission 1549" is a pretty average but fun movie, that
can easily be mistaken for a b-movie cheese-fest (I know I did). And
for that I guess we have to thank the English translator team seeing as
how the original Japanese title doesn't really translate as anything
close to "Samurai Commando Mission 1549". Still it's not a complete
waste of time even if you did expect campy fun, and if you've got 90
minutes to lose, there's no reason not to watch it.
5 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- Change future? No-way, says history, 17 June 2005
Author:
Syd Mori (s_mori@sa2.so-net.ne.jp) from Yokohama, Japan
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Sengoku jieitai 1549 (a.k.a. "Samurai Commando Mission 1549") is a
rewriting of the 1979 piece starring "Sonny Chiba" and produced by the
same Kadokawa company. An SDF (Self-Defense Force) unit is blown back
to 1549, the age of warring states, where its leader Matoba (Takeshi
Kaga) decides to live as warrior. Two years later, SDF finds out what
happened, and sends a rescue team consisting of Kashima (Yosuke
Eguchi), Matoba's ex- lieutenant and now retired, joining the team as
"observer", and Kanzaki (Ms. Kyoka Suzuki) who was responsible for that
accident. Black holes are erupting. They have only 74 hours to "do
something" about Matoba who they found out had feigned himself as
Nobunaga (a historical figure who came close to unifying Japan) who
wanted to "change future" with his SDF technology. Defeated, Kashima's
group finds an ally in a kid called Tosuke, who was later to become the
historical figure who unified Japan, and the real Nobunaga who had been
with them from 2005. Compared to the 1979 Sengoku, where the SDF unit's
only course was "fight to death", the 2005 Sengoku is quite positive in
approach. It depicts how the characters did their best in living
instead of dying and this includes Matoba despite his sinister scheme.
Yosuke Eguchi, very tall, has starred in TV dramas playing wide-
ranging roles. Veterans Takeshi Kaga and Kyoka Suzuki provide solid
acting. The film marks departure from conventional jidaigeki (films set
in samurai days). The cast is an example; another example is non-use of
the Kyoto theatrical combatants. These have succeeded in making the
film a pure entertainment piece, without the traditional fetters and
samurai BS like "dying to live".
Notes & explanations (added 6/30/'05)
1) "Sengoku jieitai 1549" is going to be one of the "trilogy" (or more)
based on novels written by Harutoshi Fukui, with the other two being
"Lorelei: The Witch of the Pacific Ocean" (2005) and the upcoming
"AEGIS", though these three films were directed, produced and
distributed by different entities. It is not a remake of the 1979
Sengoku but more Fukui's original, inspired, perhaps, by the 1979
movie.
2) "Kyoto theatrical combatants": These are a group of stunt men called
"ta'te" who belong to (Toei Company's) Kyoto studio. They are experts
at getting killed in jidaigeki samurai dramas. Most jidaigeki dramas
and films rely on them to save choreography time and money. But the
result is that you always see the same people getting killed in
different dramas and movies. By the time "Sonny" (Shin'ichi) Chiba
starred in the 1979 "Sengoku", he disliked this idea, and had formed
JAC (Japan Action Club). The principal members then included Etsuko
Shihomi, who's starred in some "Hissatsu ken / Sister Street Fighter"
series (1974-1975)(and also in "Shanhai bansukingu" (1984) and "Nidaime
wa Christian" (1985) in which she doesn't kick anybody). I suppose the
producers of "Sengoku jieitai 1549" agreed with Chiba in not using
these stunt men. Using them would've made the film "another of those
jidaigeki".
4 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- A Huge Disappointment - Spoilers!, 19 June 2005
Author:
bushido_man from Sagamihara, Japan
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Having been a fan of the original 1979 "Sengoku Jieitai" for many
years, I was elated to hear about the remake and eagerly chomping the
bit to see the remake. What a disappointment.
The original film was not great by any standard, but its campiness and
over-the-top black humor made the film quite enjoyable and satisfying.
The concept was new and original at the time - the image of the modern
Self Defense Force attack helicopter popping up over the ridge and
machine gunning an army of samurai warriors on horseback was superbly
entertaining. In the end, of course, the medieval warriors were
victorious, as the modern-day soldiers caught up in the time warp ran
out of ammo and succumbed to arrows, spears, and other nasty weapons.
The remake is based on the original plot but changes it drastically. In
this version, a group of Self Defense Force soldiers artificially
recreates the time warp on a mission to rescue and bring back the first
group. While commander Iba in the original film realizes at the very
end that he was in fact the Japanese warlord Oda Nobunaga, in the
remake, Iba tells his would-be rescuers that he in fact killed Nobunaga
and assumed his identity in a bid to change history. It's a classic
notion - the lost leader gets caught up in his new surroundings and
decides to use his knowledge for evil purposes (think Apocolyse Now or
The Island of Doctor Moreau). In this case, Iba has even managed to
somehow develop a nuclear weapon, which he plans to use on his enemies
in a bid to take over all of medieval Japan. Of course, his "rescuers"
conclude that this madman must be stopped.
This was not a BAD movie, but I went into it thinking it would be like
the original, only updated. I was wrong. The story was completely
different, and that was the real source of my disappointment. And while
the original film was fun, this one got tedious and boring real fast.
If you've never seen the original, you might want to check this out.
Yes, the plot and circumstances are completely absurd. They were in the
original version also, and yet I found it charming - but not this one.
0 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- Why at war if we can be at peace?, 16 January 2006
Author:
lawtoo from Hong Kong
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This movie is at best a good pastime. Its script is commonplace and
everything is par for the course. It won't take long before you know
the whole plot. But who cares if all you want is a mere pastime during
holiday. Still, team spirit and personal sacrifice are pervasive(some
are quite unnecessary). That couldn't draw a lot of tears, though. The
back-to-the-past scenes are by no means hi-tech; they are tacky ----
just some flashes, smoke, and twisted faces of the actors. And here
they are: the year 1594!! That said, the message ---Why at war if we
can be at peace?--- is still the crux , which we are unable to achieve
even nowadays. Maybe ,we are less barbaric than before, but that hunger
for power and dominance is still deep-seated in the minds of die-hard
aggressors.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglinestrailers and videospostersphoto galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Sengoku jieitai 1549 (2005)
11 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :-

To be honest . I wasn't really expecting something like this, 14 April 2007
Author: K_Todorov from Bulgaria
A name like "Samurai Commando Mission 1549" does create an obvious expectation of a movie produced with cheese, written with cheese and directed with cheese. By cheese I of course mean low budget b-movie quality. Strangely enough "Samurai Commando" is nothing like that. And even stranger, it's actually pretty good, considering you value straight entertainment dazzled with a light but pleasant plot about time travel. I know I liked it.
"Samurai Commando Mission 1549" is the second movie adaptation of a novel written by Ryo Hanmura. The first being the campy and fun, 1979 "G.I. Samurai". Starring cult favorite action star Sonny Chiba. Notably, the two movies have very little in common besides their basic plot-outline. A small squadron of the Japanese Self Deffense Force including vehicles are sucked into a time-warp and find themselves in the middle of the Senguko period. A very bloody era when Japan was torn by countless battles between power-hungry warlords. Seeing as they have no apparent way of returning home the men of the SDF taskforce decide to do their best and adapt to this time. And by adapt I do mean exploit their superior military equipment so that they could dominate Japan. This is as close as the two adaptation get from one another. "Samurai Commando Mission 1549"'s main group of characters are actually the rescue team sent to find/stop the missing squadron. It seems their tinkering in the past has made the present a bit more unstable and it's up to these men (and woman) to save the modern world from disappearing.
Granted, yes the story does get a bit melodramatic at some points, but is still surprisingly well written. Plot holes are kept to a minimum, characters are good, nothing all that impressive but not detracting either. Their motivations are well fleshed-out, dialog is acceptable, lack of backgrounds does hurt the overall quality though. Also one other essential ingredient is missing, Sonny Chiba. Not that the actors here did their jobs bad or anything, but the absence of Chiba's charismatic presence becomes quite evident once you've seen the original movie.
Another surprise was the quality of the visual effects. Which I honestly thought, would've come straight from a 80s sci-fi flick. Costumes looked really good and authentic. Some pretty good CGI animation was used for some of the more complex scenes involving vehicles and explosions. And talking about explosions, that is something we have plenty of in "Samurai Commando Mission 1549" and director Masaaki Tezuka does a good job at distributing it in equal measures throughout the movie, while keeping the best for last. There is some blood here, but no vast amounts of gore or arterial fountains (sorry guys). Action scenes are decently directed, choreography is good but not phenomenal.
"Samurai Commando Mission 1549" is a pretty average but fun movie, that can easily be mistaken for a b-movie cheese-fest (I know I did). And for that I guess we have to thank the English translator team seeing as how the original Japanese title doesn't really translate as anything close to "Samurai Commando Mission 1549". Still it's not a complete waste of time even if you did expect campy fun, and if you've got 90 minutes to lose, there's no reason not to watch it.
5 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-

Change future? No-way, says history, 17 June 2005
Author: Syd Mori (s_mori@sa2.so-net.ne.jp) from Yokohama, Japan
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Sengoku jieitai 1549 (a.k.a. "Samurai Commando Mission 1549") is a rewriting of the 1979 piece starring "Sonny Chiba" and produced by the same Kadokawa company. An SDF (Self-Defense Force) unit is blown back to 1549, the age of warring states, where its leader Matoba (Takeshi Kaga) decides to live as warrior. Two years later, SDF finds out what happened, and sends a rescue team consisting of Kashima (Yosuke Eguchi), Matoba's ex- lieutenant and now retired, joining the team as "observer", and Kanzaki (Ms. Kyoka Suzuki) who was responsible for that accident. Black holes are erupting. They have only 74 hours to "do something" about Matoba who they found out had feigned himself as Nobunaga (a historical figure who came close to unifying Japan) who wanted to "change future" with his SDF technology. Defeated, Kashima's group finds an ally in a kid called Tosuke, who was later to become the historical figure who unified Japan, and the real Nobunaga who had been with them from 2005. Compared to the 1979 Sengoku, where the SDF unit's only course was "fight to death", the 2005 Sengoku is quite positive in approach. It depicts how the characters did their best in living instead of dying and this includes Matoba despite his sinister scheme. Yosuke Eguchi, very tall, has starred in TV dramas playing wide- ranging roles. Veterans Takeshi Kaga and Kyoka Suzuki provide solid acting. The film marks departure from conventional jidaigeki (films set in samurai days). The cast is an example; another example is non-use of the Kyoto theatrical combatants. These have succeeded in making the film a pure entertainment piece, without the traditional fetters and samurai BS like "dying to live".
Notes & explanations (added 6/30/'05)
1) "Sengoku jieitai 1549" is going to be one of the "trilogy" (or more) based on novels written by Harutoshi Fukui, with the other two being "Lorelei: The Witch of the Pacific Ocean" (2005) and the upcoming "AEGIS", though these three films were directed, produced and distributed by different entities. It is not a remake of the 1979 Sengoku but more Fukui's original, inspired, perhaps, by the 1979 movie.
2) "Kyoto theatrical combatants": These are a group of stunt men called "ta'te" who belong to (Toei Company's) Kyoto studio. They are experts at getting killed in jidaigeki samurai dramas. Most jidaigeki dramas and films rely on them to save choreography time and money. But the result is that you always see the same people getting killed in different dramas and movies. By the time "Sonny" (Shin'ichi) Chiba starred in the 1979 "Sengoku", he disliked this idea, and had formed JAC (Japan Action Club). The principal members then included Etsuko Shihomi, who's starred in some "Hissatsu ken / Sister Street Fighter" series (1974-1975)(and also in "Shanhai bansukingu" (1984) and "Nidaime wa Christian" (1985) in which she doesn't kick anybody). I suppose the producers of "Sengoku jieitai 1549" agreed with Chiba in not using these stunt men. Using them would've made the film "another of those jidaigeki".
4 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-

A Huge Disappointment - Spoilers!, 19 June 2005
Author: bushido_man from Sagamihara, Japan
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Having been a fan of the original 1979 "Sengoku Jieitai" for many years, I was elated to hear about the remake and eagerly chomping the bit to see the remake. What a disappointment.
The original film was not great by any standard, but its campiness and over-the-top black humor made the film quite enjoyable and satisfying. The concept was new and original at the time - the image of the modern Self Defense Force attack helicopter popping up over the ridge and machine gunning an army of samurai warriors on horseback was superbly entertaining. In the end, of course, the medieval warriors were victorious, as the modern-day soldiers caught up in the time warp ran out of ammo and succumbed to arrows, spears, and other nasty weapons.
The remake is based on the original plot but changes it drastically. In this version, a group of Self Defense Force soldiers artificially recreates the time warp on a mission to rescue and bring back the first group. While commander Iba in the original film realizes at the very end that he was in fact the Japanese warlord Oda Nobunaga, in the remake, Iba tells his would-be rescuers that he in fact killed Nobunaga and assumed his identity in a bid to change history. It's a classic notion - the lost leader gets caught up in his new surroundings and decides to use his knowledge for evil purposes (think Apocolyse Now or The Island of Doctor Moreau). In this case, Iba has even managed to somehow develop a nuclear weapon, which he plans to use on his enemies in a bid to take over all of medieval Japan. Of course, his "rescuers" conclude that this madman must be stopped.
This was not a BAD movie, but I went into it thinking it would be like the original, only updated. I was wrong. The story was completely different, and that was the real source of my disappointment. And while the original film was fun, this one got tedious and boring real fast.
If you've never seen the original, you might want to check this out. Yes, the plot and circumstances are completely absurd. They were in the original version also, and yet I found it charming - but not this one.
0 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-

Why at war if we can be at peace?, 16 January 2006
Author: lawtoo from Hong Kong
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This movie is at best a good pastime. Its script is commonplace and everything is par for the course. It won't take long before you know the whole plot. But who cares if all you want is a mere pastime during holiday. Still, team spirit and personal sacrifice are pervasive(some are quite unnecessary). That couldn't draw a lot of tears, though. The back-to-the-past scenes are by no means hi-tech; they are tacky ---- just some flashes, smoke, and twisted faces of the actors. And here they are: the year 1594!! That said, the message ---Why at war if we can be at peace?--- is still the crux , which we are unable to achieve even nowadays. Maybe ,we are less barbaric than before, but that hunger for power and dominance is still deep-seated in the minds of die-hard aggressors.
Add another comment
Related Links