Yoko! Jakamoko! Toto! (2002– )

TV Series  -  Animation | Family
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.7/10 from 58 users  
Reviews: 1 user

Add a Plot


0Check in

Editors' Spotlight

Emmy Awards 2014

We have the winners, photos and more in our 2014 Emmys section.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 79 titles
created 28 May 2013
a list of 97 titles
created 10 months ago
a list of 25 titles
created 6 months ago
list image
a list of 4 titles
created 3 weeks ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Yoko! Jakamoko! Toto! (2002– )

Yoko! Jakamoko! Toto! (2002– ) on IMDb 5.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Yoko! Jakamoko! Toto!.




Unknown   2003   2002  
1 win. See more awards »


Series cast summary:
 Jakamoto / ... (18 episodes, 2002-2003)
Rob Rackstraw ...
 Toto (18 episodes, 2002-2003)
Alex Kelly ...
 Yoko (15 episodes, 2002-2003)


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


Animation | Family



Official Sites:



Release Date:

30 August 2005 (Sweden)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

I know it's been years since I've seen this abomination, but here's three words to describe it
15 July 2014 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

Dumbest. show. EVER. I'm serious. This is even dumber than the Rabbids Invasion OR Breadwinners combined! All it is is three animals saying their names OVER AND OVER again! That's all they say! That's the only dialog! The reason I remembered this show after all these years was because I was on TV Tropes reading their entry on Sanjay and Craig (one of my most hated shows ever after Marvin Marvin), and they mentioned "Pokémon Speak" as a trope used in the second episode Laugh Quake. Not knowing what Pokémon Speak meant, I looked it up and saw they mentioned this show as an example of a show with the trope. And I remembered, this has GOT TO BE the DUMBEST show EVER. Seriously, how can you morons give this retarded piece of crap a 7.7? And get this, it was actually seven point EIGHT before I voted. Yet you give Gordy a 3.6? What kind of retched world do we live in when this kind of crap gets a solid score yet Gordy is awful? Have you people even WATCHED Gordy? I think people are biased against Gordy just because it came out the same year as Babe. But it came out BEFORE Babe. NOT after. So it can't be a rip-off. That, and there's the fact that they've got completely different plots. I mean, is Gordy about a pig becoming a sheep dog? Was Babe about a pig saving his family? No and no. SO IT IS NOT A RIP-OFF! And come on. Other Disney movies are similar. I mean look at Sleeping Beauty vs. Snow White. They've got similar plots. Not to mention Lion King not only is similar to Bambi, but it's said to be a loose retelling of Hamlet. I haven't read Hamlet yet, but I read some stuff about it on Wikipedia and thought, "That DOES sound like Lion King!" Especially the killing the king and the ghost of Hamlet's father parts. Plus people say The Aristocats ripped off One Hundred and One Dalmatians and/or Lady and the Tramp, but it's not hated a lot. I even heard Bolt was similar to The Truman Show (no I haven't seen TTS, but I read a summary of the plot and it did sound similar to Bolt). But back to this show. The only reason I give it a 1/10, is because I can't vote 0. Otherwise, this would be a solid 0/10 just like The Thundermans, The Haunted Hathaways, Rabbids Invasion, Sanjay and Craig, Breadwinners, and other awful crap I've rated 1/10 which includes Home on the Range (I felt generous the day I reviewed that crappy cow cartoon so I said 2/20 when I really meant 0/10). And don't forget Dog with a Blog or Shake it Up. They get 0s too. Pretty much everything I put in my list "Worst new Nick shows since 2008" gets a 0/10. Yes even Sam & Cat 'cause that show ain't great either. Same for any crappy episode of SpongeBob except a lot of episodes don't even deserve 0. They deserve negative numbers. Like for example, A Pal for Gary gets a -97 while The Splinter gets a -62. Gullible Pants gets a -89 while The Battle of Bikini Bottom (my #1 most hated episode) gets -999. Oh yeah, and Sanjay and Craig doesn't even deserve 0 either. It actually gets -centillion. Same for Marvin Marvin, Breadwinners, and AwesomenessTV. I realize this may not be the worst show ever (as far as I can tell that would be Marvin Marvin), but it just may be the DUMBEST show I have ever watched. Yes, people, it's dumber than the Rabbids Invasion AND Breadwinners both combined. At least on Rabbids, the Rabbids themselves don't talk but whenever human characters are present the humans talk. Although no humans were present in Omelet Party, Rabbid Race to the Moon, or Hypno Rabbid. For Breadwinners, as awful and disgusting as that show may be, at least the two ducks have jobs delivering bread to make people happy. When I watched this show, I could not find ONE GOOD THING about it. I only saw it about 11 years ago, and even then I thought this has GOT TO BE the DUMBEST show ever. This really belongs in The worst of the worst by Rectangular businessman. It's THAT awful.

UPDATE ON JULY 29: I just saw Rectangular businessman rate this a 6. But I STILL think it belongs in The worst of the worst. I mean, why this crappy cartoon a 6 if shows like Victorious, T.U.F.F. Puppy, and iCarly are all rated 1/10 and in The worst of the worst? Not to mention Teletubbies was in The worst of the worst too even though I LOVE that show! However when I checked the ratings, I discovered a score for Teletubbies was not submitted. Otherwise it would have been another example of "Titles you rated higher" since it already listed Victorious AND T.U.F.F. Puppy. Also he rated Braveheart AND The Big Bang Theory with 1s even though Braveheart was rated 8.4 and The Big Bang Theory 8.7. Yet this show gets a 6? I will never understand that. Also, this show is JUST LIKE The Oogieloves in the Big Balloon Adventure. Because the ratings do not match up. Because there's only 29 votes from males and 8 from females yet it has 43 votes and not 37. And it was a 5.6 from males and a 6.0 from females. So shouldn't that equal 5.8? NOT 7. And guess what else? US users have TWO POINT SIX yet non-US users have EIGHT POINT TWO. Why do non-US users love crappy shows? They also loved Sam & Cat. And other crappy shows. Yet it US-users that love Marvin Marvin, Breadwinners, Rabbids Invasion, Sanjay and Craig, or Robot and Monster.

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Cute MyLittlePonyFiendshipIsMagick
Discuss Yoko! Jakamoko! Toto! (2002) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: