MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 363 this week

Punk: Attitude (TV 2005)

TV Movie  -   -  Documentary | Music  -  4 July 2005 (USA)
7.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.5/10 from 977 users  
Reviews: 25 user | 16 critic

A documentary on the music, performers, attitude and distinctive look that made up punk rock.

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 28 titles created 10 months ago
 
a list of 24 titles created 16 Mar 2011
 
a list of 132 titles created 06 Jan 2011
 
a list of 400 titles created 9 months ago
 
a list of 962 titles created 1 month ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Punk: Attitude (TV 2005)

Punk: Attitude (TV 2005) on IMDb 7.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Punk: Attitude.

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
K.K. Barrett ...
Himself
Roberta Bayley ...
Herself
Jello Biafra ...
Himself
Glenn Branca ...
Musician, Composer
Bob Gruen ...
Himself
...
Herself
John Holmstrom ...
Himself
...
Herself
...
Himself
Darryl Jenifer ...
Himself
...
Himself
Mick Jones ...
Himself
...
Himself
Glen Matlock ...
Himself
Legs McNeil ...
Himself
Edit

Storyline

Punk: Attitude is a documentary on the history of punk rock in the USA and UK. The film traces the different styles of punk from their roots in 60s garage and psychedelic bands (Count Five, the Stooges) through glam-punk (New York Dolls) to the 70s New York and London scenes and into the hardcore present. Interviews with many of the musicians are edited with live clips and historical footage. Written by Jim Whittaker

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

punk | punk rock | musician | band | interview | See more »

Genres:

Documentary | Music

Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

Release Date:

4 July 2005 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Punk: Attitűd  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Quotes

Jello Biafra: By the end of say, oh maybe mid-'79, the only people playing punk music left were the people who really wanted to be there. And so there was this big split, which meant punk went more underground, and got more intense, more purist in a way, which is both good and bad, and more hardcore.
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Well done Don Letts
19 October 2005 | by (London, England) – See all my reviews

I watched this last night and was thoroughly hooked from the first moment to almost the very end. As someone old enough to remember walking down Portobello Road in the summer of 1976 and thinking "something really weird is going on", it was a marvellous exercise in nostalgia for ME, but I was wondering what a young person would make of it all. I think they would find it interesting but I don't know if they would necessarily understand just how revolutionary the whole thing was. It would have been good to have included some short clips of contemporary mainstream acts such as Abba, Yes, Fleetwood Mac etc just to provide some reference points for what Punk was rebelling against. As the man who virtually single-handedly introduced reggae to the punk scene, Letts is admirably modest about his own contribution but in a way it would have been more accurate if he had allowed his many interviewees to sing his praises a little more. I thought Chrissie Hynde was the most insightful (as usual) and the women in general gave more interesting interviews than the men. One aspect of Punk was that it was almost completely un-sexist and this was thoroughly recalled and explained. The more unsavoury aspects of Punk: the neo-fascism, the glorification of hard drugs, the violence - these were rather glossed over, I felt. The despicable inhumanity of the hardcore scene in the US in the early 80s was hardly mentioned, nor were the psychotic antics and subsequent suicide of G G Allin. Neither were the abominable Oi bands mentioned, with their extreme right-wing Nazi leanings. Although I can understand Lett's not wanting to give them any publicity, any history of Punk that fails to acknowledge the extremely dark places that some of it led to is incomplete. Although the film suffers from the usual shortcomings of music documentaries - ie. the vintage clips are too short and the interview clips are too long - as an attempt to celebrate the positive aspects of Punk it is completely successful. Too bad Johnny Rotten and Iggy Pop obviously refused to take part, or Lou Reed for that matter. Never mind. This is a very worthwhile film and anyone who is interested in the Punk phenomenon will find it fascinating.


3 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
the 'What's that song' thread CrowleyHead
Hüsker Dü Masoo
Nirvana? tuff_guy_headbanger
So nothing happened in the 80's? negro_elvis
other post punk documentries? cousin_ed78
Modern Punk? NMonty
Discuss Punk: Attitude (2005) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?