IMDb > Breaking and Entering (2006) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
Breaking and Entering
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guide
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

Reviews & Ratings for
Breaking and Entering More at IMDbPro »

Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 9 of 10: [Prev][4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [Next]
Index 92 reviews in total 

2 out of 5 people found the following review useful:

Good intentions developed on a very slow movie

Author: Argemaluco from Argentina
10 December 2007

I'm not a fan of director Anthony Minghella.His films The English Patient and The Talented Mr.Ripley,in spite of being acclaimed,had bored me with extremely slow developments.The only film directed by him that I liked was Cold Mountain and it was not great.Breaking and Entering,his most recent film,had good intentions but it's enormously sloooooow.This film has irrelevant scenes which do not add anything to the story(specially,the moments in which the prostitute appears).The movie's running time is of 2 hours but it's so slow that the running time seems to be of 4 hours.The film has a few good things like good intentions,a very good performance from Juliette Binoche and a good characters' development.But that things do not save this movie from being a tedious and extremely slow experience.I do not recommend Breaking and Entering.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 5 people found the following review useful:

Ethical pablum.

Author: Paul Creeden from Boston, MA, USA
1 July 2007

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

This is a film of the times. Confused, soulless and rich with the narcissistic Angst of the wealthy. But, after all is said and done, the wealthy control projects which are staffed by superstars. The acting is excellent, as would be expected of Ms. Binoche, Ms. Wright, Mr. Winstone and Mr. Law. The script is halting, labored, overly mannered. The story has no ethical point whatsoever, though it implies a great deal of depth in that area. All the behaviors of the tortured characters are muddied in motivation and equivocation. We are supposed to believe that the Serb-Bosnian adolescent is really a great kid, when he's not being and accomplished thief/acrobat. We are supposed to believe that the English detective, played by Winstone, who is a slum kid grown into a modern angry man, sees this immigrant kid as a poor Dickensian waif, worthy of a second (albeit third or fourth) chance. The wealthy protagonist, played by Law, is so screwed up he has to be told what to do to be compassionate or ethical or even human. He seems somehow absolved by the script for being a self-absorbed, spoiled, whining prig. This is a film which will be viewed twenty years hence by an audience which may well say, "What were they thinking?" Like all those 1980s movies with big hair and shoulder pads. And, speaking of the 1980s, just say "No" to this one if you have the choice.

Was the above review useful to you?

3 out of 7 people found the following review useful:


Author: Gordon-11 from Earth
28 May 2007

This film is about how a man deals with the repeated break-ins into his architectural firm.

I find this film rather average. Though Jude Law is amazing on the eyes as usual, I still find the movie rather lacklustre. The acting is not bad, in fact I find Juliet Binochet rather convincing as a Slavic immigrant. The relationship between Jude Law and Robin Wright Penn is tense, with the cracks between the relationship well hightlighted. However, I think the problem is that there are no emotional high points in the movie. Everything is plainly told, and there is not much to chew on after the movie. I find this movie a disappointment, maybe that's because I expected so much from Anthony Minghella.

Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 2 people found the following review useful:

therapeutic effects

Author: (baiser_gat) from Canada
16 March 2007

I did not watch the movie yet, but was told yesterday that movie was playing in Ottawa and was suggested to go immediately and send as many as possible to watch it since the movie was described as an extraordinary!!! It is one of the best some of my friends seen ever; they believe that movie could even have the therapeutic and profound effects on people from former Yugosavia living outside of the country and dealing with the issues of survival and overwhelming pain. The idea is that by watching the movie we could learn more about it and explore it in its depth, but this exploration should be a start for a further growth and development; the life might be beautiful with this (almost) incurable pain that however often might be the source of creativity.

Was the above review useful to you?

5 out of 12 people found the following review useful:

Breaking and Entering Your Wallet

Author: vitaleralphlouis from United States
12 May 2007

This movie is offered as an "Exclusive" at a major video chain, so we gave it a try even though it never played theaters. Absolutely nothing of any viewer interest happens during the initial 35 minutes. Well, OK, we learn that being acrobatic comes in handy in the burglar trade. Well, 3 cheers and a dog biscuit! The story is essentially nil, there is no character development, and the London settings are not used to any advantage.

My wife fell into Z-city and my eyelids were drooping so I stopped this DVD and put on "Music and Lyrics" and we both woke up. Where the 7, 8, or 9 ratings came from, I have no clue. This film is flat, boring, and a waste of your time.

Was the above review useful to you?

9 out of 20 people found the following review useful:

If it Breaks, Enter

Author: Clayton Davis ( from New Jersey
26 September 2006

Breaking and Entering Anthony Minghella's latest work is as anomalous as it is rapture. The Academy Award winning director of "The English Patient" has brought brutal honesty of a different type of culture but I'm afraid the middle acts of the film leave the audience too disenchanted and by the final act when it finally does pick up, we are already lost in the quarrel of deceit and dialogue.

Minghella brings us the story of Will, (Jude Law) an architect who has just opened up his own company with his long time business partner Sandy (Martin Freeman). Unfortunately, they open up on a rough side of London and have a few "B & E's" before taking it upon themselves to sniff out the culprit. The culprit however, is a young fifteen year old boy, Miro (Rafi Gavron) who works for a gang of thugs who consists of his late father's side of the family. The acrobatic Miro must jump railings, rooftops, etc. in order to shake authorities but somehow finds himself intrigued by Will's architecture. When Will is not sniffing, he is distancing himself away from his long time girlfriend Liv (Robin Wright Penn) and her behaviorally challenged daughter Beatrice. The strain on their relationship has been ten years in the making with their unmarried lifestyle and soon to become familiar nature.

After many nights of sitting and having conversations with the local and extremely humorous prostitute, (Vera Farmiga) Will discovers his guilty party and pursues Miro all the way to his home. In Miro's home he lives with his hard-working and loving mother, Amira (Juliette Binoche) and Will's attraction is sparked immediately before even fathoming a mention of Miro. The two start a very involved and passionate love affair with Amira having no knowledge of Miro's extracurricular events.

Minghella does a fantastic job of wrapping us in the story from the premise of the film but somewhere in the ladder we are left on the side of the road in an unbalanced rising action. In its 120 minutes of running time, the audience meets and greets the characters; we are brought intimately with each of them and like Minghella's previous works, he introduces us with much dialogue but in this case it was not enough to suffice. While I admire the honesty, truth and expression of human weakness of the picture, I needed a little more to pull me along the story to keep me progressing.

As usual Gabriel Yared's score is evident and gives great conviction to each scene along with the beautiful camera work and editing and fortunately, the performances were sufficient enough to keep me intrigued in the story. Jude Law regrettably is "Dan" from "Closer" for a good duration of the film but rest assure by the final act he gives his best performance to date. Not entirely sure what happened the first 2/3 of the film but Law completely lost himself in "Will" for the resolution and emerged a true leading thespian. It is Law's final performance that saves the film from being ordinary to something a little more. I'm uncertain of his chances with the "Gold Man" because we've seen a Jude Law like this before and he's had excellent chemistry with Minghella as we saw in his previous nominated works. I suppose there's too much flaw in his armor to carry it all the way to battle.

Juliette Binoche has proved time and time again that she is a reliable actress to carry a film. As the refugee survivor "Amira," Binoche stretches out her legs to give us someone utterly heartbreaking and unlike what we've seen before. The admiration for "Amira" is in her strong and undying espousal for her son. Amira is determined to set her son straight on a path and you can't deny the love between them. It is in the intimate moments of laughing and kissing between the mother and son, that we find the emotional center of the tale. Minghella really deserves praise for directing and showing us one of the best mother-son moments of contemporary cinema. Binoche and Gavron are truly that good.

The standout and M.V.P. of the film is the no-less than perfect Robin Wright-Penn as Oscar's favorite lady; the suffering wife or in this case girlfriend. Wright has taken large steps in Indie films the past few years but she gives the Swedish and beautiful Liv, a sense of humanity that actresses like Winslet and Weisz can only pull off. "Liv" is an attentive mother, a loving girlfriend, but a woman with a tortured soul that by credits end you bring home with you. Despite some of her accent flaws, which came from time to time, Wright never leaves "Liv" unattended and gives the film the backbone needed to walk a very rough road. If there's any aspect of the film to nominate it is Robin Wright-Penn for charisma, zeal and dedication to a role that sounds formula-matic on paper but no formula in sight. There's much fondness in "Liv" and many women can relate to her character which is probably why she's so great.

As this was being touted as Minghella's best work to date, I might pass on that notion. We could see a worthy screenplay nomination and a much needed Maria Bello-like nomination for Robin Wright-Penn. (I'm telling you, it's that good) Other than that, nothing spectacular about the movie although it may appeal to crowds of Minghella stalkers and lovers but not to this critic.

Grade: **1/2/****

Was the above review useful to you?

4 out of 11 people found the following review useful:

A sensation!

Author: keithtrumbo from United States
19 January 2007

See the film for one reason only....Vera Farmiga. She plays the hooker and for the approximate 10 minutes she's on the screen it comes alive. The experience reminded me of seeing 'Easy Rider' when first released and being hit with a jolt when Jack Nicholson lit up the screen. She is electric! (See how under used she is in 'The Departed'...wouldn't know it's the same actress).The others are all good but she's like a wake-up call! As a morality play I find there's only so much wallowing in others messy lives that I can take when they continue down the road of self destruction. I had no sympathy at all for Jude/Robin/daughter characters and wished that Ray Winstone & Julitte Binoche had been the heart of this story...would have been much more alive and unpredictable. Well photographed, the film captures a dark edge of today's London that makes one want to keep looking over one's shoulder.

Was the above review useful to you?

1 out of 6 people found the following review useful:

An arch film with a poor script and direction

Author: Mike Kleinsteuber from Bristol, UK
22 September 2009

Wow, I was hoping for a lot more than this.

It's script reads like a play and is stilted in the way most plays are.

People just don't talk like this.

Combined with poor casting and stiff direction it makes for a self aware and distancing film.

It seems a little over rehearsed as well and therefore very unnatural.

If you like good films, like '21 Grams', where the direction and acting is assured and the script beautifully fluid, you won't like this piece of poor theatre.

I didn't really want to say much more but I have to write ten lines. The shooting style is also stiff and I couldn't imagine one of the actors actually 'being' one of the parts. Even Ray Winstone as the east-end detective was arch and stilted. His lines were appallingly written, where much of the normal banter between people who don't know each other was dispensed for lines that assumed a relationship. Just like most middle-class, self aware theatre pieces. In fact the longer I write this the worse it gets. Can I stop now please ?

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 8 people found the following review useful:

soft and clever

Author: antoniotierno from Italy
12 February 2007

I found it pleasant for many reasons, although it is a little bit depressing. Provides a close-up picture of peculiar aspects of London and Londoner's life, with men and women behaving cruelly and cheating on each other and moreover handles intimate issues in an elegant and intelligent way. In "Breaking and entering" we watch people engaged in heart games but we also know about topics like sex interface, race and class; intellectually speaking the experiment is certainly worthy of wide attention, though not brand new, and definitely works successfully. As for the emotional level everything passed the examination for sure

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 8 people found the following review useful:

I expected much more than this

Author: gugute from Leeds, England
12 November 2006

I went to see the film yesterday, expecting something very special - it is easy to understand when the cast and director is such a brilliant bunch of talented people. But something went wrong. I am not sure when the story turned the wrong way but it didn't feel right nor real or sincere anymore. Quite a disappointment, really. I think there was something incomplete and insincere about Will's and Amira's love story. Too predictable? Not enough feelings? Anyway, Jude Law,Robin Wright Penn and Martin Freeman give a good performance. But that's it. If you expect real life drama, real feelings or something that will keep your thoughts captured even when you leave the cinema - this is the wrong film. Maybe I had too much expectations but that is not surprising when you see names like that on the poster. Juliette Binoche disappointed me this time. All the others act great but that was just not enough.

Was the above review useful to you?

Page 9 of 10: [Prev][4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [Next]

Add another review

Related Links

Plot summary Ratings Awards
External reviews Parents Guide Official site
Plot keywords Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history