IMDb >
Marple: The Murder at the Vicarage (2004) (TV)
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsMarple: The Murder at the Vicarage (2004) (TV) More at IMDbPro »
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writers:
Release Date:
19 December 2004 (USA)
more
Plot:
No one seems surprised when Col. Lucius Protheroe, the most disliked person in St. Mary Mead, is found murdered in the local village, and red herrings abound. full summary | add synopsis
Awards:
Nominated for Primetime Emmy.
Another 2 nominations
more
User Comments:
Joan Hickson is still the tops
more (18 total)
Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only) more
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
94 min
Language:
Color:
Sound Mix:
Certification:
Filming Locations:
Company:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Miss Marple is shown reading Raymond Chandler's short story anthology "The Simple Art of Murder", which also contains his titular essay on the detective novel. In the essay, Chandler argues that, in real life, the most unsolvable murders are the simplest, and criticizes, among other writers, Agatha Christie for creating implausible, over-elaborate murder plots for her novels.
more
Goofs:
Factual errors: In the beginning of the film, when Miss Marple is ready to go to church, you can see a calendar on the table showing August 1951. On the calendar, the month begins with a Tuesday. In fact, the 1st of August 1951 was a Wednesday.
more
Quotes:
DI Slack:
[to a constable as Miss Marple is some distance walking away] I don't know whether to buy her a box of chocs or kick away her stick.
Miss Jane Marple: [still walking away] I prefer the chocolates.
more
Miss Jane Marple: [still walking away] I prefer the chocolates.
more
Movie Connections:
Follows Marple: The Body in the Library (2004) (TV)
more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (18 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Marple: The Murder at the Vicarage (2004) (TV)| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| Funny Coincidence | Cali7 |
| Miss Marples past..... | DEStrong |
| My Foolish Heart--performer? | alpinebixby |
| theme song | kontiki86 |
| Subtitle Desired | alpinebixby |
| Filming Location? | CanadianWunderkind |
Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| The Murder at the Vicarage | Marple: The Moving Finger | The Mirror Crack'd | Marple: A Murder Is Announced | Snow Falling on Cedars |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Crime section | IMDb UK section | Add this title to MyMovies |

I recently watched "Marple: Murder at the Vicarage" (starring Geraldine McEwan), and must say I was not overly impressed.
If the police investigations of the day were conducted as they were in this dramatisation of Agatha Christie's novel, it's a wonder that any criminals were ever caught at all, much less convicted, with or without any dotty old ladies poking their noses in. Even in a pretend TV "whodunnit" investigation, a little reality goes a long way.
Not only was the murder scene not secured, but suspects "et al" were allowed to come and go through it at will, and in fact there was never any "boffin" in sight. No incident room was ever set up, but then I didn't see many police around to actually use one. No fingerprints appeared to have been taken or checked for (even though at the denouement it could clearly be seen that "dabs" were left all over said murder scene), and any reference to or collection of written statements were completely overlooked. Awkward for any later trial I would have thought. Albeit modern forensic science has advanced out of sight since the 1950's, initial proceedings were surely much the same then as they are now.
I was brought up in an English village during the same period (the Fifties) in which this production was set (although the book was written about 20 years earlier), but I didn't "recognise" any of the characters. They were all like plastic effigies straight out of a Hollywood studio, and the village itself from the top of a chocolate box. Although similarly born of Agatha Christie's pen, both characters and village were much more believable in the previous Joan Hickson series, and in which the direction was much more knowing. To its credit however, the story-line stays reasonably faithful to the novel, except for Professor Dufosse and his daughter. Where on earth did they come from? They're certainly not creations of Agatha Christie, and never appeared in the book. An unnecessary additional red-herring from the producers no doubt, or are they a replacement for Dr Stone (an archaeologist) and his secretary Miss Cram? If so, why? Why change the characters? Also, as another reviewer has reminded us, Miss Marple was the ultimate spinster and only had one small "fling" when young, which was maternally cut short.
Considering the impressive line up of star actors both young and old on display here, there should have been an equally impressive result. It was considerably short of that, and one is left to wonder why this re-make was ever produced, and with all due respect to Geraldine McEwan, magnificent actress though she is, the late Joan Hickson still reigns supreme as Jane Marple.