These Foolish Things (2006)A young actress seeks to follow in her famous mother's footsteps. Director:Julia Taylor-Stanley |
|
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
These Foolish Things (2006)A young actress seeks to follow in her famous mother's footsteps. Director:Julia Taylor-Stanley |
|
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
|
|
Charlotte Lucas | ... |
Lily Evans
|
| Craig Rooke | ... |
Stage Manager
|
|
| Julia McKenzie | ... |
Miss Abernethy
|
|
|
|
Roisin Goodall | ... |
Diana 3 Years Old
|
|
|
Sinead Goodall | ... |
Diana 8 Years Old
|
|
|
Jordan Metcalfe | ... |
Garstin 14 Years Old
|
| Michael Gabriel | ... |
Douglas 14 Years Old
|
|
| Joanna David | ... |
Mrs. Bannock
|
|
|
|
Graham Seed | ... |
Rev. Bannock
|
| Zoë Tapper | ... |
Diana Shaw
|
|
| Leo Bill | ... |
Garstin
|
|
|
|
John Broad | ... |
Tavistock Hotel Porter
|
|
|
Tatina de Marinis | ... |
Tall Girl
|
| Eve Myles | ... |
Dolly Nightingale
|
|
|
|
Joan Blackham | ... |
Mrs. Griffin
|
A young actress seeks to follow in her famous mother's footsteps.
Not the best film in the world but a good effort by upcoming director Taylor-Stanley. I'm giving it seven because it wasn't dreadful and because the film score was fantastic.
Some of the acting is stronger in some places; some is weaker - I wasn't overwhelmed by the performance of the leading role of Diana, but supporting roles were good: Andy Lincoln did a great piece as Lovell, and Terence Stamp was wonderful as Baker. There were one or two small anachronisms, but mostly what you'd consider "anorak" things; for instance there is one point in the office of a theatrical agent where he fakes a telephone call, and the wire connecting the hand-held part of the Telephone is curly whereas in the 30s it should have been straight. There was also the use of the phrase 'Jesus H Christ' which was an anachronism, but generally a good film. The film score was wonderful, Mr Lynn is a complete unknown but it appears that the risk Taylor-Stanley took by hiring him was worth it.
As mentioned above, as a combination of the film's strong and weak points, I give it 7 out of 10.