MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 1,005 this week

The Origins of AIDS (2004)
"Les origines du SIDA" (original title)

 -  Documentary  -  2 May 2004 (USA)
7.9
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.9/10 from 293 users  
Reviews: 14 user | 2 critic

Documentary about the hypothesis that HIV may have been caused by mass vaccination against Polio, in Congo, between 1957 and 1960.

Directors:

, (as Catherine Peix)
0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb at Comic-Con 2014

Follow our coverage of Comic-Con 2014, direct from San Diego July 23-27 in our Comic-Con section.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 33 titles
created 04 Sep 2012
 
a list of 1269 titles
created 19 Mar 2013
 
a list of 1310 titles
created 27 May 2013
 
a list of 22 titles
created 7 months ago
 
a list of 1677 titles
created 5 months ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Origins of AIDS (2004)

The Origins of AIDS (2004) on IMDb 7.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Origins of AIDS.
2 wins & 1 nomination. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Cecil Fox ...
Himself (as Dr. Cecil Fox)
Simon Wain-Hobson ...
Himself (as Dr. Simon Wain-Hobson)
Joseph Vandepitte ...
Himself (as Dr. Joseph Vandepitte)
Tom Curtis ...
Himself - Rolling Stone journalist
John Martin ...
Himself - former FDA scientist
Edward Hooper ...
Himself - Author
Bill Hamilton ...
Himself - Biologist
Stanley Plotkin ...
Himself (as Dr. Stanley Plotkin)
Robin Weiss ...
Himself (as Dr. Robin Weiss)
Joseph Limbaya Mwenge ...
Himself - Camp Lindi
Baelo Alukelo ...
Himself - Camp Lindi (as Christophe Bayello)
Philippe Elebe ...
Himself - former assistant
Pierre Doupagne ...
Himself
Jacques Kanyama ...
Himself - former assistant
Amelie Ndababaye ...
Herself - Gihanga villager
Edit

Storyline

From the hyphotesis of British journalist Edward Hoope, the film reopens the explosively controversial subject of the origins of AIDS, zeroing in specifically on his fiercely contested proposition that the HIV virus was first transmitted to children in the Belgian Congo via contaminated polio vaccine. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Documentary

Edit

Details

Country:

| | | |

Language:

|

Release Date:

2 May 2004 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Der Ursprung von AIDS  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
You have to see this if you are a human.
4 December 2005 | by (San Antonio, TX) – See all my reviews

This is absolutely a must-see. Stop reading comments and go see it. When you're done, come back and read, if you are still able to. More likely your mouth will be stuck in an open position, your body in a state of near-paralysis on the couch. This is mind-bending stuff.

The film is very well-executed and the presentation is objective. But it does not carefully examine every theory as to the origin of AIDS--only the most interesting one. It makes no claim to comprehensiveness however, and I doubt that it's fair to criticize it on that ground.

By "interesting," I mean "horrible" and "shocking." If this theory is correct, the AIDS epidemic could easily have been prevented. It boggles the mind and sickens the stomach to think of the millions who have died possibly because of an event that could have easily been prevented.

Could the AIDS epidemic be the result of the negligence or recklessness of the greediness, or laziness, of two scientists testing a new polio vaccine in the Belgian Congo? Did they use the wrong kind of monkey? And did they know of the severity of the risk involved in doing so? Should they have known? The film attempts to answer these questions.

In 2005, I tried to locate a copy for purchase, but so far the only way I know of in which to see this film is on its rare airings on the Sundance Channel.

Response to the Reviewer Who Claims This Film Is Flawed:

He is clearly missing something and needs to re-view the film. He's completely misunderstood the theory that is the subject of this film, and the film presents the theory so clearly and precisely that it is difficult to understand how his misunderstanding could have possibly taken place if this reviewer had actually seen the entire film. The film never claims that the batch of virus used for tests in the Belgian Congo was the same as the batches used by Americans, or anyone else for that matter. This reviewer's objection makes absolutely no sense.

In response to the same reviewer who suggests that we should not care about the origins of AIDS, and we should focus only on what we should do about AIDS now--this is almost too ridiculous to respond to. History is important, for many really obvious reasons. Obviously, the question of what to do about the AIDS epidemic is also an interesting one, but it is not what this film is about. It is not fair to criticize a film for not delving into a subject you're interested in. It's like claiming the Wizard of Oz is flawed because there aren't enough sex scenes or gunfights. The Origins of AIDS is about the origins of AIDS. It is not about what to do about AIDS now, and it does not, at any point, make any inkling of a claim to have tackled that issue.

I believe the reviewer who claims this is flawed really did not actually watch the entire film. This may not be a perfect film, but the particular criticisms in that review are seriously flawed, and that review can safely be ignored.


12 of 17 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Too Bad None of it is True mdavidf
To answer the question posed in the review. wendy-joy
This theory was disproven a year ago by research cheng_yen1
Where can I get this film? 1tnauq1
Will compensate generously... katz-bryce
Discuss The Origins of AIDS (2004) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page