Lucid (2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Review from 2005 TIFF
riid14 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film at the 2005 Toronto International Film Festival.

Lucid is the second feature film from Sean Garrity (Inertia) and had its world premiere here at the festival. Lucid is about a psychotherapist named Joel, played by Jonas Chernick, who also wrote the screenplay with Garrity. Joel is leading group therapy sessions with Victor (Callum Keith Rennie), Chandra (Michelle Nolden), and Sophie (Lindy Booth). Each seems to be suffering in their own way with post-traumatic stress disorder, Victor being aggressive, Chandra being withdrawn, and Sophie turning to prescription drugs. Joel himself is under his own stress of his wife leaving him, manifesting itself in insomnia, not being able to talk with his daughter (Brianna Williams) and even hearing profanity in a children's cartoon. It is not long before Jonas' problems and those of his patients begin to affect each other.

It is difficult to say too much about the movie without giving anything away, but I thought that Chernick did an excellent job as Joel, making his struggle to understand his reality interesting. I also thought that Lindy Booth did a nice turn in the role of Sophie. While the story may not necessarily be anything new, Chernick's and Garrity's screenplay does give an intriguing take on it, and kept me hooked until the end.

Lucid also screened with the good but disturbing short film Room 710, from Ann Marie Fleming, who is also at the festival this year with the movie The French Guy.

Director Sean Garrity, and actors Jonas Chernick, Michelle Nolden, and Brianna Williams stayed for a Q&A after the film. Note that there are some spoilers in these comments: - The budget for the film was $2 million.

  • Chernick said he was inspired by a lot of other movies in the genre, and that the movie got darker once Garrity came on board.


  • It only took Garrity about 23 days to shoot the film. He made an interesting comparison to his last film Inertia, which took about the same time to film but was made for a quarter of the budget.


  • The first draft of the screenplay was written about seven years ago; they joked that like most Canadian films, the bulk of the time in making the film was taken up by trying to obtain financing.


  • The movie was shot on 35mm film.


  • Callum Keith Rennie was the first choice for the role of Victor, and he joined after reading the script.


  • The score was done by Richard Moody, describe by Garrity as a "boy genius Winnipeg viola player" who he has collaborated with before. Garrity said he likes working with non-keyboard players. They received some additional funding at the end of the production, which allowed them to hire some members of the Winnipeg Symphony to perform on the soundtrack.


  • They tried to inject a more humorous tone into the movie, which they felt makes it harder to see the end coming.


  • The Snugglebugs animation in the movie was done by Frantic Films, a Winnipeg FX house.


  • Originally, the character of Joel was a patient, not the doctor, but Garrity and Chernick found that test audiences were too willing to accept Joel's opinions about what was happening. By switching him to be the therapist, people can then share his character's skepticism.


  • Brianna Williams has been acting since she was 8 or so, and turns 10 in May.


  • Cinematographer Michael Marshall has worked with Garrity before on Inertia, and on a number of other films, including some with Guy Maddin.


  • Garrity wanted the colour to drain out of the film as it progressed, being more orange in the beginning, but blue/black/white by the end. They didn't use gels to get the effect; they shot outdoors using film balanced for indoor light and used blue lights.


  • The film is scheduled for general release in March 2006, but they will be taking the film to a number of other Canadian festivals before then.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Breathless
Spammer3318 March 2006
It's been a very long time since I saw a movie that kept my attention and embraced me the way Lucid did on opening night in Winnipeg.

Even though I'm not one to keep up on popular culture, I had the good fortune to hear Garrety on the radio pleading with the local community to go out and support Lucid on opening weekend. The concept sounded intriguing and I'm all for encouraging local film industry.

While I'm not an informed critic and can't comment on whether or not it "looked Canadian," or had good lighting, I can tell you that people should see this movie. It's hard to provide a review without giving away any major elements but in my own opinion the movie isn't about what the promoters say it is ... it's much more.

Not since Memento and Fight Club has a movie held my attention and required so much attention to detail. When the movie finally unfolded I had to catch my breath. You know a good movie when it leaves you asking questions about yourself and the world around you.

Brianna Williams, who played Jenny, was like the spokes of a wheel, with Joel in the middle and his therapy group going around and around in circles. She kept everyone connected and her character was understated and well-presented. The guy who played Victor was very intriguing.

Sad, funny, clever and endearing. What good fortune to have been listening to the radio on a Thursday morning before opening night.

Go see the movie!
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Cheaper version of Stay
ThrowmeaBeer6 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER!!!!! Don't read if you haven't seen this or Stay or even The Machinist. You've been warned.

Okay so, these three movies came out about the same time. Who knows if one copied the other, or if the same idea fairy came by and told each of the filmmakers the same idea, but come on, this it was all a dream bull needs to stop. I mean these movies go all out, play our minds, though Stay was pretty creative at moving places, and in the end, the best they can come up with is the equivalent of waking up from a scary dream. I do got to give it up for Lucid. I mean with a bunch of no known actors it got tossed in the ring against what two movies with Oscar winning and nominee actors. Out of the three I still give it up for Stay. I mean everyone you see are the same group of actors. That plus Ryan Gosling is a hell of an actor.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sean Garrity is promising
bob9981 May 2006
Lucid is a very good supernatural thriller that had me entertained throughout its running time. Usually when I go to a Canadian film it is with a certain apprehension; I think I'm going to be bored to death by some witless story that was made as a tax dodge. Sean Garrity with his second film is roughly where Atom Egoyan was when he made Exotica: just on the cusp of world recognition. The story is very funny at first--you have the nuttiest trio of confused minds in therapy, and their therapist, Joel, who has many problems himself. The tone gets darker and more violent as the story advances.

Jonas Chernick as Joel and Michelle Nolden as Chandra are very good, Joel trying to help Chandra with her fixation on her dead sister. Callum Keith Rennie does a terrific turn as Victor, a man full of psychic pain and violence--we first see him throwing a chair against the wall and demanding that his release form be signed. Rennie has an expressive acting style that allows him to be funny, sinister and very dangerous all in the same scene. This is a film that deserves wide distribution outside Canada.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Insomniac's Dream about REALITY
andreiz2k10 March 2006
Just like the main character's circumstances are a mixture of contrasts, so is the movie: it has unmistakable indy roots & feel, yet the way it's made is very professional. It could easily pass as a Hollywood production to someone watching it on FastForward. It also has a rather large range of moods, ranging from funny, to violent, to delicate, and even to depressing. But although the main character is a shrink (or a shrink wannabe), and you'll get to learn more about post-traumatic stress disorder than you would in a full-year psych course, the director manages to stir it into entertaining territory with ease.

I watched it in a late night sneak preview at University of Toronto, and I was lucky to have a Q&A with the director, who answered most of my questions even before I asked them (he's a psychic more than he is a psycho). Apparently, he found inspiration in his very own Yoko Ono, who's also a psych major :)
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A fabulous, intelligent film and a credit to Canada!
nicolaj-rippon1 April 2010
I'd like to begin this review with a warning - before watching this movie please take care not to watch any of the special features on the DVD version nor read too many reviews since several (including some of those on this site) give away important plot points that will utterly spoil any viewing for you! With this in mind I won't attempt to discuss the film's plot in great detail. There are plenty of twists and turns and the story stays gratifyingly away from clichés. All four lead actors (Jonas Chernick, Callum Keith Rennie, Michelle Nolden and Lindy Booth) put in terrific and powerful performances. (No surprise with Rennie who is most certainly one of the finest actors currently working in cinema & television although largely unsung in the US and the UK) All four characters are absolutely believable and all are multi- layered. The three latter actors (playing the former's patients) manage to convey their characters' balance of vulnerability with manipulation and make the viewer sympathetic to their individual plights whilst being appropriately discomforting to watch at times. There are some clever cinematic devices used (of which you will become more aware once you have watched the film in its entirety and studied the extra features on the DVD) but these are done cleverly and subtly and not at all self-indulgently. This is a fabulous, intelligent film and it will leave you thinking. And you'll probably be debating it for a time to come. You'll certainly find it isn't the film you thought you were watching at the outset!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The self-alleged "open" ending as per Garrity's own words...
casch01016 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
In general, I agree with the reviews sent, i.e. the lack of originality. But then, you can have originality and yet deliver an awful painfully unbearable and unacceptable film. This is a wonderful film, very well crafted and with conveying strength and warmth.

My only "...too bad that..." complaint would be the Director's self-alleged "open" ending... So...(1) where they ghosts trying to grab Joel back to deadland with them?. This is suggested in one of the final shots in the elevator, the 3 of them trying to grab Joel, and slithtly blueish light poured on them into the elevator (the end of the (in)famous tunnel?). Or (2) same as film with Watts, Ewan McGregor and Ryan Golsling Joel is dying and frames the whole film in his brain during his last minutes of lucid life? Does he actually die in the end?.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed