MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 329,805 this week

Shooting at the Moon (2003)

 -  Short  -  12 November 2003 (USA)
5.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.6/10 from 22 users  
Reviews: 1 user | 1 critic

Add a Plot

0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb: What to Watch - Guardians of the Galaxy

In the latest episode of IMDb: What to Watch, Keith Simanton talks with director James Gunn and actors Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana and Vin Diesel about their movie Guardians of the Galaxy.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

Art
a list of 8 titles
created 10 Jan 2013
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Shooting at the Moon (2003)

Shooting at the Moon (2003) on IMDb 5.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Shooting at the Moon.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
Matthew Martin ...
Buddy
...
Lana
Jesse Richards ...
Man with Hat
Marco Rafala ...
Speaking Man
Lucian Martin ...
Convulsing Man
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Short

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

12 November 2003 (USA)  »

Box Office

Budget:

$1,000 (estimated)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Let me tell you a little something about film-making...
15 February 2006 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

More specifically, "Outlaw" Film-making (I use the term "outlaw" here rather than "underground," because I feel the latter carries with it a certain archaic connotation... no disrespect to artists who prefer that terminology) The reason why Outlaw Film-making has yet to see any real insurgence as of late is not because of lack of funding or memorable work... The problem is that too many filmmakers outside the Hollywood system are trying to get in... they use their films as ways of creating stories comparable to those produced by the film industry. What they forget is that it is in fact an INDUSTRY... thus making its output mechanical and without feeling (save the exception of a few anomalies here and there).

Now on to "Shooting the Moon"... man oh man... I could probably write 10 pages on the eight minutes on screen... but I'll spare you. This is a damn fine example of Outlaw film-making. I live in LA... Hollywood to be exact... and this little film from Connecticut blew me away. What I really dug about "Shooting the Moon" (besides the Tom Waits title reference) is the fact that the filmmaker employed elements of Americana and post-modernism such as the Buddy Holly-esquire main character, the beautiful, Rockabilly reminiscent opening track by Billy Childish, and a plethora of other little nuances that gave the film a very nostalgic piece. However, unlike so many new filmmakers, they did it all out of a genuine love of all those things. While a lot of post-modern filmmakers would use those elements because they seem "cool" or "quirky," their interest in the material is purely superficial, and it is in this work that there is an actual genuineness... You can tell Richards and Watson have a genuine love of nostalgia and Americana: Diners, Buddy Holly, Rockabilly, Punk Rock even... The themes of the film itself are about nostalgia... looking for a love that is no longer there... are further augmented by the gritty, black and white photography.

If more people made films like this... well, maybe the film industry wouldn't quite be so lucrative... but it would certainly be a better place. And, who knows... it's as the man once said: "Give the people what you want and they'll end up wanting what they get."

Overall, a commendable job from Richards and Watson. I look forward to future projects from both.


2 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Shooting at the Moon (2003) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?