Up 3,590 this week

Indian Point: Imagining the Unimaginable (2004)

TV Movie  |   |  Documentary  |  13 September 2004 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.7/10 from 50 users  
Reviews: 2 user

A documentary about the Indian Point power plant and it's virtual lack of security following the tragic events of September 11, 2001.



0Check in

IMDb Picks: August

Visit our IMDb Picks section to see our recommendations of movies and TV shows coming out in August.

Visit the IMDb Picks section

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 10 titles
created 10 Jun 2011

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Indian Point: Imagining the Unimaginable (TV Movie 2004)

Indian Point: Imagining the Unimaginable (TV Movie 2004) on IMDb 5.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Indian Point: Imagining the Unimaginable.


Credited cast:
Alex Matthiessen ...


A documentary about the Indian Point power plant and it's virtual lack of security following the tragic events of September 11, 2001.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis





Official Sites:



Release Date:

13 September 2004 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Felt a bit boring and amateurish ...
3 January 2008 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

Wow, programs on just about any kind of nuclear danger are usually a lot more interesting. Somehow, this film ended up feeling like a mediocre effort.

Its premise is interesting: the Indian Point nuclear power plant could be a good target for a terrorist attack.

However, I was so distracted by the way the movie was made that it was hard to take it seriously. It seemed more like a student project than a serious professional effort. Although it really shouldn't matter, Rory Kennedy's voice sounded so child-like (sorry Rory), that it was distraction from the start.

Add to that some flimsy structural aspects (like choppy transitions from one issue to the next) and a relative lack of opposing commentary discussing the problems presented (something more than what was presented would have helped) ... and the film comes across as questionable.

Rory simply states that a lot of important people didn't wanted to talk to her. So then we get comments by people she knows like Al Franken ... why are we hearing Al Franken's (a comic writer) views on terrorist threats?

But all that aside, there are some good points raised and we should probably be concerned about nuclear power plants being targets. I just wish one of the major news networks would do a 20-30 minute segment on the topic; I would like to see a good, coherent and engaging presentation of the issue.

0 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Contribute to This Page