7.3/10
81
5 user

The Truth Behind the Moon Landings: Stranger Than Fiction (2003)

The Truth Behind the Moon Landings (original title)
Reviews

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
Himself - Apollo 11 Astronaut
Marcus Allen ...
Himself - Publisher
Bill Kaysing ...
Himself - Former Head of Technical Publications, Rocketdyne
Patrick Moore ...
Himself - Astronomer (as Sir Patrick Moore)
Ian Morrison ...
Himself - Jodrell Bank
...
Himself - Narrator (voice)
James E. Oberg ...
Himself - NASA Space Engineer 1975-1997 (as Jim Oberg)
Paul Renne ...
Himself - Geochronologist (as Paul Renne PhD)
Ralph René ...
Himself - Author 'NASA Mooned America'
Richard Underwood ...
Himself - Apollo Monitor of Photographic Experiments
Jerry Wiant ...
Himself - Chief Engineer
Jay Windley ...
Himself - Former Space Engineer
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Documentary

Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

Also Known As:

Månelandingerne - fup eller fakta?  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Featured in MoonFaker: Exhibit A: Shadows (2007) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Carefully Edited to Be One- Sided
28 March 2006 | by (Bangkok, Thailand) – See all my reviews

Somewhat a convincing moon hoax movie, but the problems about it is the issue that they don't allow both sides to go face to face on the issue. And this makes me very uncomfortable that both sides should get equal chance. A carefully edited movie can easily be made to side one way or the other.

This worries me, because I have done this kind of movie editing before. Why did they don't analyse don't use lie detector tests (voice stress, polygraph, reverse speech), I don't know. At least it will give some information to the viewers, done by a competent expert, who can prove his expertise based on known information.

I still remember to this day about the shooting of JFK, in which ABC T.V. interviewed a forensic expert after looking at the autopsy that he had analyzed a bullet coming from the front and go through the back of the head of JFK. Unfortunately, this was censored out from mass media for nearly 40 years, but still available in historical archives, and now we conclude still wrongly that the bullet came from behind, without an information from forensic experts records based on autopsy examination.

The difference between a good documentary and a persuasive movie is a documentary gives full chance of presenting all evidence a persuasive movie will edit out certain information. I could easily defend on the other side by just telling you that the lunar module was robot spaceship and there is a video that during the lunar landing that these three were circling the earth. Of course that piece of information was not "presented" here or perhaps "carefully edited out" as what one movie maker mentioned to me in passing.


3 of 31 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Contribute to This Page