6.9/10
14,102
33 user 70 critic

The Stanford Prison Experiment (2015)

Trailer
2:31 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $12.99 on Amazon Video

ON TV
ON DISC
ALL
Twenty-four male students out of seventy-five were selected to take on randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.

Writers:

, (book)
Reviews
Popularity
182 ( 888)
4 wins & 3 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Experimenter (2015)
Biography | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

In 1961, famed social psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted a series of radical behavior experiments that tested ordinary humans willingness to obey authority.

Director: Michael Almereyda
Stars: John Palladino, Anthony Edwards, Jim Gaffigan
Drama | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

Kevin's mother struggles to love her strange child, despite the increasingly vicious things he says and does as he grows up. But Kevin is just getting started, and his final act will be beyond anything anyone imagined.

Director: Lynne Ramsay
Stars: Tilda Swinton, John C. Reilly, Ezra Miller
99 Homes (2014)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

A recently unemployed single father struggles to get back his foreclosed home by working for the real estate broker who is the source of his frustration.

Director: Ramin Bahrani
Stars: Andrew Garfield, Michael Shannon, Laura Dern
Drama | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

26 men are chosen to participate in the roles of guards and prisoners in a psychological study that ultimately spirals out of control.

Director: Paul Scheuring
Stars: Adrien Brody, Cam Gigandet, Forest Whitaker
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

High schooler Greg, who spends most of his time making parodies of classic movies with his co-worker Earl, finds his outlook forever altered after befriending a classmate who has just been diagnosed with cancer.

Director: Alfonso Gomez-Rejon
Stars: Thomas Mann, RJ Cyler, Olivia Cooke
Comedy | Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

A young muckraker decides to start his own underground newspaper at his high school.

Director: Bryan Goluboff
Stars: Ezra Miller, Zoë Kravitz, Griffin Newman
The 33 (2015)
Biography | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

Based on the real-life event, when a gold and copper mine collapses, it traps 33 miners underground for 69 days.

Director: Patricia Riggen
Stars: Antonio Banderas, Rodrigo Santoro, Juliette Binoche
Biography | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Set during the Cold War, American chess prodigy Bobby Fischer finds himself caught between two superpowers and his own struggles as he challenges the Soviet Empire.

Director: Edward Zwick
Stars: Tobey Maguire, Liev Schreiber, Peter Sarsgaard
The Walk II (2015)
Adventure | Biography | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  

In 1974, high-wire artist Philippe Petit recruits a team of people to help him realize his dream: to walk the immense void between the World Trade Center towers.

Director: Robert Zemeckis
Stars: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Charlotte Le Bon, Guillaume Baillargeon
Joy I (2015)
Biography | Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

Joy is the story of the title character, who rose to become founder and matriarch of a powerful family business dynasty.

Director: David O. Russell
Stars: Jennifer Lawrence, Robert De Niro, Bradley Cooper
Dark Places (2015)
Drama | Mystery | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  

Libby Day was only eight years old when her family was brutally murdered in their rural Kansas farmhouse. Almost thirty years later, she reluctantly agrees to revisit the crime and uncovers the wrenching truths that led up to that tragic night.

Director: Gilles Paquet-Brenner
Stars: Charlize Theron, Nicholas Hoult, Christina Hendricks
The Program II (2015)
Biography | Drama | Sport
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

An Irish sports journalist becomes convinced that Lance Armstrong's performances during the Tour de France victories are fueled by banned substances. With this conviction, he starts hunting for evidence that will expose Armstrong.

Director: Stephen Frears
Stars: Ben Foster, Chris O'Dowd, Guillaume Canet
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Dr. Philip Zimbardo
...
Christopher Archer
...
Anthony Carroll
...
Karl Vandy
...
Paul Vogel
...
John Lovett
...
Gavin Lee / 3401
...
Prisoner 416
...
Daniel Culp / 8612
...
Jerry Sherman / 5486
...
Peter Mitchell / 819
...
Jeff Jansen / 1037
...
Mike Penny
...
Jesse Fletcher
...
Edit

Storyline

Twenty-four male students out of seventy-five were selected to take on randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

They were given 2 weeks. It lasted 6 days.


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for language including abusive behavior and some sexual references | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

17 July 2015 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Untitled Stanford Prison Experiment Project  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$37,514 (USA) (17 July 2015)

Gross:

$643,557 (USA) (18 September 2015)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Billy Crudup and Michael Angarano were both in Almost Famous. See more »

Goofs

When the principal investigator of the experiment speaks with his colleague, the colleague says that he will see him at the beginning of the semester. Stanford does not have semesters; rather, it has a quarter academic calendar. See more »

Quotes

Peter Mitchell: Blow it out your ass, Mr. Correctional Officer!
See more »

Connections

References Cool Hand Luke (1967) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
The ugly side of the human condition.
8 August 2015 | by (Suffolk, England) – See all my reviews

I've always been fascinated by the original Stanford prison experiment. It always had the ingredients for a fascinating study of human behaviour. Its conductor Dr. Philip Zimbardo knew that, it just had to be played out. Of course, The Stanford Prison Experiment is a story that's been notably portrayed before, such as the 2001 German film Das Experiment. I remember being a fan of it when I first saw it, but I admit I can't quite recall it enough to make a comparison here. Nevertheless, this American version which doesn't make substitutions is a preferable version, one that makes resourceful use of today's technology and young talent. There's a dual study going on here. One, the part that writes itself, a document of the actual experiment. And the other, an examination of the ethics of the experimenters. Here is the ugly side of the human condition and our desires to push one another to feel the sweet taste of superiority.

While it may lend the obvious yet compelling results of what imaginary power and authority does to people, it still needs to be well executed to work. Fortunately director Kyle Patrick Alvarez and writer Tim Talbott have the right handling of the material, working with great economy in balancing its dichotomy's. At first it's disarmingly casual in the way the volunteers are selected and summoned, making a point of its randomizations and often offering an endearing and natural sense of humour. While superficially bleak, it's having fun with the 70s clothes and oversized moustaches, without peeling back their integrity. But then real tension, real anguish, and a real sensation of danger and dread creeps in and The Stanford Prison Experiment becomes deeply unsettling in its dehumanization techniques. With a careful sense from Alvarez of how far to escalate each sequence, it rings true to human sensibilities of what would happen in this unique situation. There's always a reminder that it isn't real, but it doesn't stop you from feeling unbearably trapped. This is nature at work, combined with a touch of modern cruelty.

There is a tendency in the film's inherent and forgivably episodic narrative that it gets you attached to a character they're focusing on only due to their upcoming exit. Thereby the film loses steam bit by bit. It gradually wins you back afterwards, but each time it takes a little longer. Ezra Miller in particular is a highlight of the first half of the film, formulating some of the most memorable instances of the prisoner's rebellions and reluctances. He's missed, but his absence only breeds more tension and vulnerability as we're left with weaker willed volunteers. If anything, this film is an impressive display of the best talent from the next generation of actors. Hopefully all to soon be familiar faces; Johnny Simmons, Tye Sheridan, Brett Davern, and a guard with the most inventive choice of wording, Michael Angarano, all stick out among other strong performances. While a crowded ensemble does mean no character gets to be fleshed out to their full potential, Alvarez and Talbott at least give room for everyone a time to shine without any dim spots.

On the experimenters end, Billy Crudup is perfect casting as Dr. Zimbardo. Donning a beard that gives him an uncanny resemblance to Satan, it doesn't remove that trustworthy glint of compassion in his eyes. His usual warmth is countered by his malicious intent to shove the volunteers to their limits and it creates an enthralling inner conflict where he's finding his own limits. The film admittedly does lack a female presence giving the nature of 24 volunteers and all the scientists being men. Its only example is Olivia Thirlby as Zimbardo's girlfriend who later involves herself in the experiment and becomes a voice of reason, but a very welcome one. It may have blind spots and a few stumbles, but it doesn't hinder what the film does right. As I was completely wrapped in its deft and dense confrontations, I kept waiting for the film to explode. Perhaps recalling the more gritty approach Das Experiment took to its second half, instead this implodes, which is a much more restrained and satisfying conclusion to watch these invisible social constructs dissolve rather than erupt.

The Stanford Prison Experiment's wealth of strong material and performances are matched by its technical ambitions. The slick photography makes it cinematic with liberal collages of close-ups and swift camera moves but still keeping it intimate. When the scene calls for rigid obedience, any time the camera moves out of line we hold our breath. It's graded with a washed-out atmosphere, relishing in the moody darkness. I've been irritated with indie films that abuse a shallow depth of field in their photography for no good reason, but this film uses it to isolate you in its grasp and as a result the film shook me up for the rest of the day. While it gets under the skin of the prisoners and the scientists, I did find myself wanting to get behind the motivations of the guards, the most vocal contributors of the experiment. Instead, thats saved for an epilogue that feels like a wise afterthought, but it's a powerful note on the personal experiments we run just because the opportunity is there. The Stanford Prison Experiment is an ideal taut psychological thriller that bristles with youthful energy and will mostly likely remain standing as one of the best of the year.

8/10


31 of 52 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Why wasn't Stanford sued into oblivion for this? gilwood
You got to be kidding... HorrorJackson23
How would this experiment work outside the U.S.? Mamabadger56
Is this movie worth seeing just for Olivia Thirlby? eyeforbeauty
So how do you think you would cope in this situation? pearlimaew
Rip Off of a German Film palmacci
Discuss The Stanford Prison Experiment (2015) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?