(2007)

Critic Reviews

59

Metascore

Based on 40 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
88
With nifty new villains, a revived Green Goblin, plus $300 million worth of aerial special effects, Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 3 is definitely good to go.
88
Miami Herald
This is a wonderfully imagined, heartfelt piece of pop entertainment that soars not only for its spectacular eye candy, but also during the moments when its protagonists simply stand still and talk to each other. How many comic-book movies can you say that about?
80
The Hollywood Reporter
The wow factor works overtime with state-of-the-art effects sequences that often are as beautiful as they are astonishing.
75
There are delicious bits aplenty in Spider-Man 3 for those who care to notice.
75
Solidly entertaining and possesses dazzling special effects, but it falls short of the near-perfection of the Spidey sequel.
75
Overly long and complicated, it's packed with crowd-pleasing moments and satisfactorily wraps up the trilogy - without quite capturing the magic of the first two installments.
75
Raimi and company deftly balance spectacle and character-based drama, occasionally tweaking the comic-book mythology but always respecting creator Stan Lee's idea that costumed crime-fighter Peter Parker's life as Spider-Man isn't all derring-do and public accolades.
67
Spider-Man 3 has terrific moments, but after the danger and majesty and romantic brio of "Spider-Man 2," those adrenalized rooftop ballets feel, more than ever, like sequences.
63
It's not dull, exactly, but neither is it much fun.
60
Will the extremely extravagant special effects prove sufficient to sustain the picture? Surely they will, this time. Still, there's a sense of fatigue in the scenes that don't involve high-tensile webs and high-tension suspense.
50
Though aspects of it are entertaining, the presence of all these mismatched pieces give Spider-Man 3 an ungainly, cumbersome feeling, as if its plot elements were the product of competing contractors who never saw the need to cooperate on a coherent final product.
25
"Spider-Man 2" was a textbook example of how to make a sequel: Deepen it, make it funnier, give it more heart and come up with a strong villain and a good story. Spider Man 3, by contrast, shows how not to make a sequel.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Spider-Man 3 (2007) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews | Message Board