MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 5,566 this week

Kill Your Idols (2004)

6.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.6/10 from 444 users   Metascore: 52/100
Reviews: 8 user | 18 critic | 10 from Metacritic.com

A documentary on thirty years of alternative NYC rock 'n roll.

Director:

(as S.A. Crary)
0Check in
0Share...

On Disc

at Amazon

Editors' Spotlight

Live Chat with Keanu Reeves

We conducted a Live Chat with Keanu about his upcoming film John Wick.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 783 titles
created 12 Aug 2011
 
list image
a list of 37 titles
created 08 Jul 2012
 
list image
a list of 23 titles
created 2 months ago
 
2
a list of 43 titles
created 2 months ago
 
a list of 1596 titles
created 1 month ago
 

Related Items

Search for "Kill Your Idols" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Kill Your Idols (2004)

Kill Your Idols (2004) on IMDb 6.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Kill Your Idols.
1 win. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Live Forever (2003)
Documentary | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

Hilarous documentary about the Britpop music scene in the Nineties, featuring all the main bands of the scene exposing the truth behind the myths.

Director: John Dower
Stars: Noel Gallagher, Liam Gallagher, Damon Albarn
Dig! (2004)
Documentary | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

A documentary on the once-promising American rock bands The Brian Jonestown Massacre and The Dandy Warhols, and the friendship/rivalry between their respective founders, Anton Newcombe and Courtney Taylor.

Director: Ondi Timoner
Stars: Anton Newcombe, Courtney Taylor-Taylor, Joel Gion
Documentary | Biography | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

A documentary on the influential musician Scott Walker.

Director: Stephen Kijak
Stars: Damon Albarn, Dot Allison, Marc Almond
Rude Boy (1980)
Drama | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

A young British punk and roadie for The Clash navigates life in socially torn 1970s England.

Directors: Jack Hazan, David Mingay
Stars: Dave Armstrong, Barry Baker, Terry Barry
Documentary | History | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  

The Los Angeles punk music scene circa 1980 is the focus of this film. With Alice Bag Band, Black Flag, Catholic Discipline, Circle Jerks, Fear, Germs, and X.

Director: Penelope Spheeris
Stars: Alice Bag Band, Alice Bag, Claude Bessey
Documentary | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

First-time filmmaker and award-winning photographer Sam Jones documents the recording of Wilco's album, "Yankee Hotel Foxtrot."

Director: Sam Jones
Stars: Jeff Tweedy, John Stirratt, Leroy Bach
Instrument (2003)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

A collaboration between filmmaker Jem Cohen and the Washington D.C. band Fugazi, covering the 10 year period of 1987-1996. Far from a traditional documentary, this is a musical document; a ... See full summary »

Director: Jem Cohen
Stars: Brendan Canty, Joe Lally, Ian MacKaye
Documentary | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

In the summer of 2004, on a car journey in Eastern Europe, Pavla Fleischer met and fell in love with Eugene Hutz, lead singer of New York's Gypsy Punk band Gogol Bordello. Captivated by his... See full summary »

Director: Pavla Fleischer
Stars: Eugene Hutz, Pavla Fleischer, Boban Markovic
Documentary | Biography | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

Daniel Johnston, manic-depressive genius singer/songwriter/artist is revealed in this portrait of madness, creativity and love.

Director: Jeff Feuerzeig
Stars: Daniel Johnston, Mabel Johnston, Bill Johnston
Fingered (1986)
Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

FINGERED is an art film that's constructed like a regular movie. Lydia Lunch plays a phone sex operator/prostitute that gets together with a guy she's been on the phone with. After a ... See full summary »

Director: Richard Kern
Stars: Lydia Lunch, Emilio Cubeiro, Marty Nation
Documentary | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  
Director: Penelope Spheeris
Stars: Joe Perry, Steven Tyler, Gene Simmons
Comedy | Drama | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6/10 X  

The rise and fall of an all-girl punk rock band in Hollywood in the 1980s.

Director: David Markey
Stars: Jennifer Schwartz, Hilary Rubens, Janet Housden
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Ron Albertson ...
Himself
Angus Andrew ...
Himself
Tristan Bechet ...
Himself
Hisham Bharoocha ...
Himself
Glenn Branca ...
Himself
Sebastien Brault ...
Himself
Brian Chase ...
Himself
Bjorn Copeland ...
Himself
Eric Copeland ...
Himself
Susan Donaldson ...
Herself
Michael Gira ...
Himself
Aaron Hemphill ...
Himself
...
Himself
Oren Kaplan ...
Himself
Lung Leg ...
Herself (archive footage)
Edit

Storyline

A documentary on thirty years of alternative NYC rock 'n roll.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

You Are A Target Market.

Genres:

Documentary | Music

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

27 January 2007 (Japan)  »

Also Known As:

Gremise ta eidola sou  »

Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$3,274 (USA) (7 July 2006)

Gross:

$7,753 (USA) (28 July 2006)
 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The title of the film is inspired by the Sonic Youth song "Kill Yr Idols". See more »

Connections

Features Submit to Me Now (1987) See more »

Soundtracks

Black Tongue
(live)
by Yeah Yeah Yeahs
Courtesy of Chrysalis Music Group
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Not a film about no-wave; an actual no-wave film.
18 June 2007 | by (NYC) – See all my reviews

Reading some of these reviews, a lot of people seem to miss the point that no-wave was an idea, not a 'scene' or a genre. It was about negating the past, not heralding it. I've read a few comments damning the film for not staying anchored in the past which is perhaps to miss the entire point of what no-wave is and stands for. Likewise, to claim the doc's point is to prove that it was "so much better in the past" is also silly and proof that the film wasn't viewed closely enough. On the contrary, this small film seems to suggest something much more complex and does so without any didacticism. It states, through subtle contradictions and especially with its genius closing montage (dont want to spoil it by explaining it), a very important point about the post-modern wall: that it's impossible to criticize an entire generation for being too nostalgic (as the older bands in the film do) without being nostalgic yourself and admitting that, yes, it was so much better back then. This impedes creativity as does the general culture of nostalgia currently. It leaves us and the culture stranded. The film really uses no-wave and its ideals as a way to prove the dangers of nostalgia, even if the nostalgia is for no-wave itself.

As for the comments above, about the newer bands not being directly related or being interconnected...WHAT??? That's completely false. Anyone in NY during that year the film presents them (2002) knows those bands were all playing together constantly. They all played the same clubs, hung out at the same bars and frequented the same magazine spreads. And I think the film is less trying to group them together than it is obviously trying comment on how the media was attempting to do so (remember those 'brooklyn scene' family trees in Rolling Stone, NME, NY mag, etc.?). I could be wrong, but the film seems to MOCK the whole idea of grouping so many individuals together as representative of one thing or of being of one voice. I think it's commenting, and not so quietly, on the manipulations of media and the music industry to do so. Mass production = mass consumption, after all. It attacks the idea of "scene" and the industry's invention of them. I think that's the not-so-subtle point of the jump-cut edits as well. That's a standard cutting practice in any documentary (to clean up the um's and ah's that retard speech)--usually it's just masked in b-roll and stills, etc. In the case of KILL YOUR IDOLS, the manipulations are just exposed. By exposing the lie, it's more honest in a way. Anyway, I wouldn't say the cuts really pervert what the people say. It's clear the editor/director is cutting out silences or blatantly juxtaposing comments to make two points into a third point (which is the art of film--creating new meanings by juxtaposing one image/sound next to another). The editing is one of the most clever aspects to me. I'd even say it mimics the herky-jerky rhythms of no- wave, as well, but that might be a stretch*. It's definitely of an unorthodox style. Some will get it; some won't. If you want "Behind-The-Music" and spoon-fed, pre-scripted sound-bites, you won't. If you like video art, you will.

I saw another comment that the new bands aren't directly related to No-Wave which is also wrong. The film maybe falters in not making the connections explicit and you may need to do your homework to find how they are...but they are actually quite connected. YYY's have often referenced no-wave in interviews (whether or not they actually succeed in their interpretation is another matter and, i think, the point of the film-- not that they are direct heirs). Liars are of an obvious ilk, particularly as their career went on. ARE Weapons are proudly waving the Suicide flag. Gogol Bordello may seem like a wild card, but as a fan, I can tell you that their first albums were produced by none other than Teenage Jesus & The Jerks' Jim Sclavunous (who's in the movie). Also, Eugene Hutz said himself the very reason he moved to NY was to audition to be in one of James Chance's later bands. Flux was produced and heralded by Mike Gira from Swans. And Black Dice have an obvious disinterest in past connections, like the no-wave bands. Anyway, they all had some connection to Sonic Youth, the original children of no-wave, which IS explicitly stated by all in the film. They were all being grouped under the no-wave umbrella by the press a few years ago (correctly or incorrectly is no matter). And, besides, a truly new no-wave band wouldn't sound anything like an imitation of no-wave, would it? It would only try to disavow itself from influence--even that of the no-wave bands, themselves. The new bands do have in common that intent to do something "new". I think the film is trying to expose whether they succeed and how they might be able to do so or what might prevent that ability. And the target doesn't seem to be the artists. It seems to be a culture and industry that commodifies the past.

Brilliant documentary. Watch it more than once. You'll need to.

*(I just read on Pitchfork that the film supposedly made for $300?? If so, that might explain it's rough and tumble feel. And considering that, the film seems impossibly epic and polished).

**(Seeing the accumulation of other posts now, it seems a lot of people confused by the film aren't from New York or hadn't heard of No Wave before. I doubt either are pre-requisites, but I thought it fair to point that I am from NYC and had heard of No Wave and most of the bands before. I'd imagine the deeper issues communicate across place or knowledge of the scenes though).


30 of 34 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
questions raised by the film tim-nicholas-1
Anyone seen this? HeedZ
I'm soooo tired of the NYC cliché drainingfaces
Like, you know Money_is_Flesh
ack! trailer question! funky511
no wave? CahillSellers
Discuss Kill Your Idols (2004) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page