7.7/10
404
9 user 10 critic

WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception (2004)

There were two wars in Iraq--a military assault and a media war. The former was well-covered; the latter was not. Until now... Independent filmmaker, Emmy-award winningTV journalist, author... See full summary »

Director:

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

ON DISC
1 win. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Peter Arnett ...
Himself
...
Himself (archive footage)
Dick Cheney ...
Himself (archive footage)
...
Himself
Nicholas Johnson ...
Himself
David Marr ...
Himself
...
Himself
...
Himself
...
Narrator
...
Himself (archive footage)
Edit

Storyline

There were two wars in Iraq--a military assault and a media war. The former was well-covered; the latter was not. Until now... Independent filmmaker, Emmy-award winningTV journalist, author and media critic, Danny Schechter turns the cameras on the role of the media. His new film, WMD, is an outspoken assessment of how Pentagon propaganda and media complicity misled the American people, while selling the war to influence international public opinion. Schechter compares and contrasts coverage on a global basis, including exclusive material and insider interviews. WMD is a serious film that exposes the media role--the biggest scandal of our time. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

How the Media won the war on Iraq! See more »

Genres:

Documentary

Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

17 June 2004 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Opla mazikis exapatisis  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$8,480 (USA) (10 December 2004)

Gross:

$27,301 (USA) (11 February 2005)
 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
worthwhile and informative, but not really that good a documentary
12 September 2005 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

This movie tells you a lot about how the media worked hand in hand with the government to pump up the war, and does an excellent job of conveying information about how the government was able to control the media. So you have to admire it for that. But if you try and look at it objectively, not as a movie that says stuff you feel should be said but just as a movie to watch, it's not really that good. Cutesy stuff like the Apocalypse Now-themed opener really adds nothing to the movie and comes across as rather film-studentish. Danny Schechter lacks the personality that allows someone like Michael Moore to stand front and center in his films, and unlike Moor Schechter fails to create a story, but basically just throws a lot of information and talking heads at the viewer with occasional whimsical bits that don't come off that well.

The movie also has a preaching-to-the-faithful quality. While Moore (you really can't talk about a modern political documentary without comparing it with Moore's films) aims to tap into a general dissatisfaction with and distrust of power and government, thus trying to connect with people outside the left (I'm not sure if he's successful, but he does try), Schechter seems to just be handing out talking points to the left. There's good information that will help you out if you start arguing in a bar with a Republican, but there's nothing that would make a Republican bother watching this.

That's a shame, because this stuff is worth knowing, and if you are one of the faithful he's preaching you will be shocked and outraged, because it's actually even worse than you might think. But in the end it's just not much of a documentary.


10 of 14 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
WMD heather_mikulski
IFC is Airing this film on 9/11/05 ERFleischer
Did whoever wrote that user review see the movie? Bgb217
Discuss WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception (2004) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?