Luvrgrl (2004) Poster

(2004)

User Reviews

Review this title
1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Worst of the worst
sjeffers-114 September 2006
I'm racking my brain to think of a worse movie, but I'm coming up blank.

This movie is pure crap for the following reasons: 1) shot on video tape 2) actors are dreadful, dredged up from a community playhouse 3) writing is horrible, derivative, predictable, boring 4) camera work is awful - overly backlit, dark faced actors are common

I won't say I want the 1.5 hours of my life back, because I didn't hang in for that long. After 5 minutes, I could see what a dog it was, and just fast forwarded and randomly checked out a minute here and there.

The "steamy" scenes are equally disappointing, not half as good as the lamest Cinemax after dark offering.

The people who gave this movie a 10 have to be actors who were in the movie. I notice there are only 5 votes (6 with my 1 star). I gave it 1 star, and that's only because I couldn't give it zero.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed