Home
search
more | tips
IMDb > What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004)
What the #$*! Do We (K)now!?
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv schedule
Awards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotes
Fun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) More at IMDbPro »

Photos (see all 12 | slideshow) Videos
What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) -- Home Video Preview

Overview

User Rating:
5.2/10   7,835 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 1% in popularity this week. See rank & trends on IMDbPro.
Writers:
William Arntz (written by)
Betsy Chasse (written by)
more
Contact:
View company contact information for What the Bleep Do We Know!? on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
27 November 2004 (Japan) more
Tagline:
a quantum fable more
Plot:
"WHAT THE #$*! DO WE KNOW?!" is a radical departure from convention. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown... more | full synopsis
User Comments:
Terrible, misleading movie more

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)

Marlee Matlin ... Lead
Elaine Hendrix ... Jennifer

John Ross Bowie ... Elliot
Robert Bailey Jr. ... Reggie
Barry Newman ... Frank

Larry Brandenburg ... Bruno
Daniela Serra ... Bride
James Langston Drake ... Groom (as Jame Drake)
Michele Mariana ... Tour Guide (as Michelle Mariana)

Armin Shimerman ... Older Man (in subway)

Robert Blanche ... Bob
Pavel Mikoloski ... Priest
Alex Rogers ... Guy #1
Tin Tran ... Guy #2

Leslie Taylor ... Bridesmaid
more
Create a character page for: ?

Additional Details

Also Known As:
What the Bleep Do We Know!? (International: English title) (informal title) (USA)
Sacred Science (USA) (working title)
more
Runtime:
109 min | Germany:113 min
Country:
USA
Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Dolby Digital
Certification:
UK:12 (video rating) (2005) | UK:12A (original rating) | Brazil:14 | Singapore:NC-16 | Germany:o.Al. | Iceland:L | Argentina:Atp | Australia:M | Canada:14A (Alberta/Ontario) | Canada:G (Quebec) | Canada:PG (British Columbia) | Ireland:PG | Netherlands:AL | USA:Unrated (not rated) | New Zealand:M
Company:
Captured Light more

Fun Stuff

Trivia:
The movie that Amanda is watching is _Chasing Destiny (2001)_, which was originally called "Romantic Moritz" as shown on the marquee. more
Goofs:
Continuity: In the wedding, Elliot hands over a drink to Amanda. She accidentally blows off the yellow mini-umbrella of her drink. Elliot licks the stick of his pink mini-umbrella and puts it in Amanda's drink. The next scene shows Amanda still has the yellow mini-umbrella on her drink, and Elliot still has his pink mini-umbrella on his drink. Although, in a film about how perception effects reality...maybe the umbrella was blue! more
Quotes:
Ramtha: God must transcend the greatest of human weaknesses. And, indeed, the greatest of human skill. God must transcend even our most remarkable attempts to emulate nature in its absolute splendor. How can any man or woman sin against such a greatness? How can any carbon unit on Earth, in the backwaters of the Milky Way - indeed, the boondocks - possibly betray God Almighty? That is impossible. The height of arrogance is the height of control of those who would recreate God in their own image. more
Movie Connections:
Spoofed in Scary Movie 4 (2006) more
Soundtrack:
The Wedding March more

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
256 out of 416 people found the following comment useful:-
Terrible, misleading movie, 13 July 2004
1/10
Author: eflood from Seattle

As a physics student, I've become aware of many idiot professors, and other so-called experts, in the field. As I continue with my studies, I learn more and more about real physics experiments going on, and about the people who are doing things right.

Then, my friends tell me of this "physics movie" they want to see. Knowing nothing of it, I'm excited, hoping that the information will be presented well.

I've done REAL quantum mechanics; this wasn't it.

This movie starts with the basic assumption that anything that occurs to a subatomic particle can, and will, occur to you, if you just open your eyes. Let's think about that, for just a moment.

Our bodies are composed of somewhere around 10^30 such subatomic particles. That is a million billion billion billion particles! The more "mysterious" quantum effects of just two particles can have a 50% probability of cancelling each other out completely. As you add more and more particles into the mix, it becomes almost impossible to have a large net quantum result. To tell us to believe that this is a valid assumption, with no rationality behind it...it's just stupid.

My friend, also in physics, and I counted 3 facts during the course of this movie. But they were presented in the most misleading manner I've EVER SEEN.

I cannot say as much for the neural portion of the movie, as I have not had any kind of medical training. It seemed as though it might have had a slight bit more truth to it, remembering my days in biology, but I cannot say.

At least this film had a redeeming quality: the dancing peptides (or whatever they actually were) scene. Not to ruin the invaluable plot that drives this movie, but the main character goes to a wedding, where she sees all different types of personalities "driven" by their peptides*, and then the film cuts to the dance floor, where we are spliced between people dancing, sometimes surrounded by CG peptides, and a fully CG scene, filled with dancing peptides. The film, at that point, was trying to tell us how we're "addicted to emotions," so we're treated to the full song of that smash hit, "Addicted to Love."

This scene was redeeming, because anyone who could go through THAT scene, and still take this movie seriously...well, you are the ones that need to "open your eyes."

Was the above comment useful to you?
more

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Why are people so stupid? El_Duderino252
This movie proves why western education corrupts open-mindedness hoasis
Forced to see this pile of steaming mouse droppings drlloyd11
How can you judge this? TheGreatWent
NOT a documentary hmc314
Just a poor proof-wanna-be of the claim that God is not exist! OMERZEN
more

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Big Fish Frida Bee Season Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Romeo + Juliet
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
IMDb Documentary section IMDb USA section Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.