IMDb >
What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004)
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsWhat the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 12 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 3) |
Overview
User Rating:
Directors:
Writers:
Release Date:
27 November 2004 (Japan)
more
Genre:
Tagline:
a quantum fable more
Plot:
"WHAT THE #$*! DO WE KNOW?!" is a radical departure from convention. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown...
more
| full synopsis
Plot Keywords:
User Comments:
How Do We Know What We Know?
more (473 total)
Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Marlee Matlin | ... | Lead | |
| Elaine Hendrix | ... | Jennifer | |
| John Ross Bowie | ... | Elliot | |
| Robert Bailey Jr. | ... | Reggie | |
| Barry Newman | ... | Frank | |
| Larry Brandenburg | ... | Bruno | |
| Daniela Serra | ... | Bride | |
| James Langston Drake | ... | Groom (as Jame Drake) | |
| Michele Mariana | ... | Tour Guide (as Michelle Mariana) | |
| Armin Shimerman | ... | Older Man (in subway) | |
| Robert Blanche | ... | Bob | |
| Pavel Mikoloski | ... | Priest | |
| Alex Rogers | ... | Guy #1 | |
| Tin Tran | ... | Guy #2 | |
| Leslie Taylor | ... | Bridesmaid |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
What the Bleep Do We Know!? (International: English title) (informal title) (USA)
Sacred Science (USA) (working title)
more
Sacred Science (USA) (working title)
more
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
109 min | Germany:113 min
Country:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Certification:
UK:12 (video rating) (2005) |
UK:12A (original rating) |
Brazil:14 |
Singapore:NC-16 |
Germany:o.Al. |
Iceland:L |
Argentina:Atp |
Australia:M |
Canada:14A (Alberta/Ontario) |
Canada:G (Quebec) |
Canada:PG (British Columbia) |
Ireland:PG |
Netherlands:AL |
USA:Unrated (not rated) |
New Zealand:M
Filming Locations:
Company:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
The movie that Amanda is watching is _Chasing Destiny (2001)_, which was originally called "Romantic Moritz" as shown on the marquee.
more
Goofs:
Continuity: In the wedding, Elliot hands over a drink to Amanda. She accidentally blows off the yellow mini-umbrella of her drink. Elliot licks the stick of his pink mini-umbrella and puts it in Amanda's drink. The next scene shows Amanda still has the yellow mini-umbrella on her drink, and Elliot still has his pink mini-umbrella on his drink. Although, in a film about how perception effects reality...maybe the umbrella was blue!
more
Movie Connections:
References Chasing Destiny (2001) (TV)
more
Soundtrack:
Forever Yours
more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (473 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| 8½ | The Pillow Book | The Acid House | Enemies: A Love Story | Los novios búlgaros |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Documentary section | IMDb USA section | Add this title to MyMovies |









I was not surprised to see many of the comments here about this film calling into question everything about it's premise. While reviewing this film for my newspaper (Cedar Rapids Gazette) I knew immediately that the concepts would be controversial and hard for the conditioned American mind to wrap itself around.
Having said that, it seems that many people view a movie like this as an all or nothing proposition -- if one theory or belief seems flawed, then it all must be called into question. What I think too many polemicists are forgetting is that this picture is a smorgasbord of different theories presented, as Rod Serling might say, for you approval -- or not.
But what many are missing is what makes this film revolutionary -- that filmmakers were able to present these concepts in the medium of film in a way that was at least entertaining and most, thought provoking. You don't have to buy off 100 percent on what is here, but the presentation, in and of itself, was stunning in its bombardment of the viewer with multi sensory imagery.
That this film was even made at all is a mini-miracle, especially in our current intellectual and cultural climate. Its sad to me to see such judgmental reviews. I knew conventional Christians would simply dismiss this as "new age" fluff and I mentioned that in my review. But I would have hoped that lovers of film and higher order thinking would be more tolerant of some of the excesses.
In short, this is a film that needs to be seen not just for its quasi-cinematic, quasi-documentary methodology but for a presentation of theories and beliefs that are rarely discussed in the ossified American mainstream. For that alone, I thank the filmmakers.