Down 3,327 this week

The Ister (2004)

Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.1/10 from 108 users   Metascore: 75/100
Reviews: 7 user | 16 critic | 6 from

A 3000km journey up the Danube river to the heart of Europe.

0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 607 titles
created 26 Oct 2011
a list of 28 titles
created 06 Jul 2012
a list of 289 titles
created 25 Nov 2012
a list of 133 titles
created 03 Jan 2013
a list of 41 titles
created 4 months ago

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: The Ister (2004)

The Ister (2004) on IMDb 7.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Ister.
2 wins. See more awards »




Credited cast:
Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe ...
Jean-Luc Nancy ...
Bernard Stiegler ...
Hans-Jürgen Syberberg ...


'The Ister' is a 3000km journey to the heart of Europe, from the mouth of the Danube river at the Black Sea, to its source in the German Black Forest. The film is based on the work of the most influential and controversial philosopher of the 20th century, Martin Heidegger, who swore allegiance to the National Socialists in 1933. By marrying a vast philosophical narrative with a fascinating journey up Europe's greatest waterway, the film invites the viewer to unravel the extraordinary past and future of 'the West.' Written by David Barison and Daniel Ross

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis





Official Sites:



| | |

Release Date:

24 September 2004 (UK)  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs



Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


References Hitler: A Film from Germany (1977) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Up the River without a Paddle
24 February 2008 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

A journey-a selective journey- up the Danube, inspired by Heidegger's commentary on Hölderlin's poem, with commentary by three French philosophers on Heidegger's works and his relationship with the Nazis, with excursions to other people- an archaeologist, a bridge-building engineer, a botanist, the film-maker Syderberg- showing examples of or exemplifying Heidegger's ideas- taking three hours in all. A kindly critic would say it was interesting; A truthful critic would say that it was interesting as an example of how to do all the wrong things to make a film. Heidegger is not a simply-understood philosopher and we are assumed to know enough about his ideas to understand the complex discourses (eccentrically subtitled) of three French philosophers, chosen, perhaps, for their cinematic effect, which takes up most of the film. What they say- and the subtitles- distracts from the often interesting and beautiful pictures, and the pictures distract from what they say, you are left struggling to find out what is happening, but above all, there is the difficulty of film compared with a book; you cannot stop and work out what someone means, you cannot look up something in a dictionary or encyclopaedia. You could argue that is reflects Heidegger's own view of history and memory and their interaction, which would explain the selective history (which, if one of his commentators is correct, might reflect Heidegger's own selective view of history, one which excluded the influence of the Jews on European thought), but again it's impossible to give a context in a film. Against that is the fact that every moment of the film is interesting; it's just that they are interesting in an uncinematic way- you want to examine what is said, think about it, check the accuracy of the claims- do all the things that a film, which consists of one thing after another- just won't let you do. It's not a professional film-makers' film and it has none of the virtues of a professional film-makers' film but, to be fair, it also has none of the faults- the simplicity that becomes simple-mindedness, the brisk sweeping away of complexity- of a professional film-makers' film so, finally, yes, it is interesting in a good- or, at least, an interesting- way too.

2 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Seen it!! Loved it!! sammules
Discuss The Ister (2004) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page