The Alfred Hitchcock Hour: Season 2, Episode 21

Beast in View (20 Mar. 1964)

TV Episode  -   -  Crime | Drama | Mystery
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.2/10 from 78 users  
Reviews: 2 user

An attorney helps a client threatened by an unstable woman who blames her for a broken wedding engagement.


(as Joseph Newman)


(teleplay), (novel)
0Check in

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Picks: March

IMDb's editors share the movies and TV shows they are excited to see in March.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 485 titles
created 18 Jun 2011
list image
a list of 9 titles
created 17 Jul 2012
list image
a list of 164 titles
created 8 months ago
a list of 5639 titles
created 7 months ago

Related Items

Search for "Beast in View" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Beast in View (20 Mar 1964)

Beast in View (20 Mar 1964) on IMDb 7.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Alfred Hitchcock Hour.
« Previous Episode | 53 of 93 Episodes | Next Episode »


Episode cast overview:
Himself - Host
Helen Clarvoe
Paul Blackshear
Kathleen Nolan ...
Dorothy Johnson
Brenda Forbes ...
Verna Clarvoe
Jack Terola
Curt Conway ...
Lt. Bromley
Peggy Moffitt ...
Robin Rath
Anthony McBride ...
Tommy Thompson
Len Hendry ...
Mr. Horner
William Boyett ...
The Young Policeman
Jimmy Joyce ...
The Cab Driver
Bruce Andersen ...
The Father


An attorney helps a client threatened by an unstable woman who blames her for a broken wedding engagement.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis





Release Date:

20 March 1964 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

I knew the twist from the start, if you don't it might work for you.
18 July 2013 | by (French Polynesia) – See all my reviews

I'm not going to talk about the plot--you can read about that elsewhere on this page. But the problem with a show where the real heart of the thing working is that you don't see the ending coming is that if you do there might not be much that will hold your interest. And in this one I knew it from the first scene. I'm not sure who to blame for this, maybe it's just part of the source novels problem too, though I think that would be a better format to pull this off in. I also saw, but don't remember if the 80's remake of this episode works better or not.

And of course if you're a fan of this series you should be well aware that many of them will feature what in some circles is called a "snap" ending. Now true this story goes on a bit after that so it's not the whole story.

Rather than have a big speech at the end to explain it all this episode instead goes another direction with a long very complicated--and only partly effective, flashback montage played out in a mirror. It must have taken a good amount of the shows 4 day shooting schedule to create the material for this scene--which is like, though perhaps more complicated--than the key nightmare scene in VERTIGO. It has a ton of optical effects, one striking image of an eyeball, and a lot of pretty cheesy lightning bolt transitions. It's really elaborate. Some of it does work and a lot of work went into it. I don't think this kind of thing was director Newman's strongest skill.

But another thing here is this is just an elaborate way to explain it all and having that sort of conventional explaining at the end is still a bit of a dull moment even when they jazz it up this way.

A good try and the most interesting element of this episode but not a total success this sequence.

Joan Hackett was a terrific actress who died far too young, but even she can't totally pull off the admittedly almost impossible to pull off final scene, though it's nice to see her try. The show has an original score by Leonard Roseman which works and he does a lot of work for that dream scene--but he can't beat Herrmann's music for the same thing in Vertigo. Not that he's trying to necessarily.

Other elements of this show move pretty quickly. The whole episode follows a sort of Italian Giallo format. Including the quirky detective who, in this one, is chomping on sugar cubes. At one point he says "It's good for quick energy." The sequence with the photography studio is kind of shrilly acted.

Hitchcock wrap around is one of the simplest of the series with one very funny throw away statement in the opening, though the station break and warp up segments are pretty dull.

I rate this episode a good swing but a clear miss. Decide for yourself maybe it's a home run.

2 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
A Home away from Home wwwocls
DId Hitchcock direct any episodes of the Hour show? phasedin
Best looking women Gymbo88
Did they really dress up like that in the early 60's? selphi
The Paragon aircrftmec
Anyone else say 'I Missed the Whole Thing'? sir-walt
Discuss Beast in View (1964) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: