IMDb > "The Staircase" (2004)

"The Staircase" (2004) More at IMDbPro »"Soupçons" (original title), TV mini-series 2004-

Videos (see all 4)
The Staircase -- A witness for the prosecution provides a statement that could damage Michael Peterson's defense, and expose a secret life.
The Staircase -- The defense team weighs the facts in Michael Peterson's murder trial.
The Staircase -- Peterson recounts the night of 12/9/01.
The Staircase -- Detective recounts arriving on the scene.

Overview

User Rating:
8.4/10   1,242 votes »
Your Rating:
Saving vote...
Deleting vote...
/10   (delete | history)
Sorry, there was a problem
MOVIEmeter: ?
Up 1% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Contact:
View company contact information for The Staircase on IMDbPro.
Seasons:
1
Release Date:
June 2004 (USA) See more »
Genre:
Plot:
Academy Award-winning documentary filmmaker, Jean-Xavier de Lestrade, presents a gripping courtroom thriller... See more »
Plot Keywords:
Awards:
2 wins See more »
NewsDesk:
(2 articles)
The Daily Beast: "At the Bottom of The Staircase"
 (From Televisionary. 4 March 2013, 9:23 AM, PST)

TV highlights 04/02/2013
 (From The Guardian - TV News. 3 February 2013, 4:05 PM, PST)

User Reviews:
Mesmerizing documentary See more (19 total) »

Cast

 (Series Cast Summary - 2 of 21)
Ron Guerette ... Himself (8 episodes, 2004)
David Saacks ... Himself (2 episodes, 2004)
(more)

Series Directed by
Jean-Xavier de Lestrade (unknown episodes)
 
Series Writing credits
Jean-Xavier de Lestrade (unknown episodes)

Series Produced by
Allyson Luchak .... producer (unknown episodes)
Denis Poncet .... executive producer (unknown episodes)
 
Series Original Music by
Joel Goodman (unknown episodes)
Jocelyn Pook (unknown episodes)
 
Series Cinematography by
Pierre Milon (unknown episodes)
Isabelle Razavet (unknown episodes)
 
Series Film Editing by
Jean-Pierre Bloc (unknown episodes)
Sophie Brunet (unknown episodes)
Adam Lichtenstein (unknown episodes)
Scott Stevenson (unknown episodes)
 
Series Art Department
Sonda L. Rowland .... painter (unknown episodes, 2007)
 
Series Sound Department
Benoit Degornet .... dialogue recordist (8 episodes, 2004)

Christophe Moreno .... sound mixer (unknown episodes, 2004)
Anne-Laure François .... sound mixer (unknown episodes)
Tristan Jaoul .... sound editor (unknown episodes)
Sébastien Wera .... sound editor (unknown episodes)
 
Series Camera and Electrical Department
Jean-Xavier de Lestrade .... cinematographer: additional scenes (unknown episodes)
 
Series Editorial Department
Christian Riffard .... post-production coordinator (unknown episodes, 2004)
 
Series Other crew
Mathias Farrugia .... subtitler: French (4 episodes, 2004)
 
Series Thanks
Christian Riffard .... thanks (unknown episodes)
 

Production CompaniesDistributors

Additional Details

Also Known As:
"Soupçons" - France (original title)
See more »
Runtime:
France:360 min (8 parts)
Country:
Language:
Aspect Ratio:
1.78 : 1 See more »
Sound Mix:

Did You Know?

Trivia:
Mike Nifong, the DA involved in the Duke Lacrosse case, appears as an assistant DA in this documentary.See more »
Movie Connections:

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
9 out of 10 people found the following review useful.
Mesmerizing documentary, 19 August 2012
Author: shanayneigh from Narnia

I have seen this documentary in its entirety four times now, and have had a different view of the case and Michael Peterson after each viewing.

I first saw the documentary as it was being screened on TV, and was immediately hooked. The final episode aired on New Year's Eve, and I actually had to leave the party I attended, and went into a separate bedroom to see the last episode - it was that intriguing! I knew absolutely nothing about the case, and was careful not to read about it on the internet, as to not ruin the ending.

The first time I saw it, I thought he was innocent, and was shocked by the verdict. The second time around, I was convinced he was guilty. After having watched the series for a third and fourth time, my view is somewhere in between. I have absolutely no idea of whether Michael Peterson is guilty or not. There are plenty of supporters for either side. Personally, I think there are enough ambiguities in this case to at least raise concerns of a reasonable doubt.

These concerns pertains largely to the technical or forensic evidence, as put forth in the documentary. First, that the injuries (or rather lack thereof) didn't match the about 300 cases (I don't remember the exact number) of fatal beatings the last 10 years or so. Of course, there's always a chance that this case is a statistical outlier, no matter how unlikely. Secondly, the supposed "scientific" methods used in the blood spatter analysis by the prosecution's Duane Deaver. I had a good laugh at that one. And just today I read in the news that Peterson has been given the chance of new trial due to the ineptitude of Deaver.

But as I said, I don't know for sure. And the same goes for vocal supporters of either side, no matter how many sketchy websites they link to.

Michael Peterson - in this documentary - is a fantastic character. He staggers around in his mansion with a pipe and a ridiculous chuckle mumbling about Goethe. I simply don't know what to make of him. He comes across as insincere, innocent or insecure - all at the same time - depending on how you interpret him and the case.

This documentary is nothing but a true masterpiece. It goes on for six hours, but never does it get boring. This case have such ridiculous twists and turns it would cause viewers to call bulls**t had they been written into a fictional drama.

I know there are plenty of people who accuse this documentary of being biased or partial. "The filmmakers shot 600 hours of material, so why didn't they include X, Y or Z in the finished documentary? This is clearly biased!" The accusation of a documentary being biased is in itself is laughable. There is no such thing as an objective documentary. It goes beyond the obvious task of cutting down 600 hours of raw material (who the hell wants to see a 600 hour long documentary?) to a more manageable form and shaping a narrative structure. The very act of choosing a subject matter to cover is in itself biased.

I suppose you can come around this problem by just putting a camera on the street and keep your fingers crossed that something interesting might happen right in front of it (I know, this sounds like it would make for a thrilling documentary, right?). But why street X instead of Y? And why point the camera north instead of south? And who would want to watch that footage without it having been edited first?

And by the way, Freda Black makes for a fantastic villain!

Be sure to watch this one, and for that matter Jean-Xavier de Lestrade's previous documentary "Murder on a Sunday Morning" - both are masterpieces of documentary cinema.

Was the above review useful to you?
See more (19 total) »

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for "The Staircase" (2004)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Is this film biased? tinywhiteflowers
The Murder Weapon Benh35
Owl theory x_imdb-385
New Episodes tpupkin
Two extra episodes have been added to series floquick2
13 Forensic Facts the Film-makers intentionally left out: res_ipsa_ii
See more »

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
The Staircase Murders In Cold Blood A Time to Kill Fracture A Few Good Men
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Episode guide Full cast and crew Company credits
External reviews News articles IMDb TV section
IMDb Documentary section IMDb France section

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Edit page' button will take you through a step-by-step process.

You may add a new episode for this TV series by clicking the 'add episode' button