Georges and Anne are an octogenarian couple. They are cultivated, retired music teachers. Their daughter, also a musician, lives in Britain with her family. One day, Anne has a stroke, and the couple's bond of love is severely tested.
Jean, a farm lad, wants to escape his silent father; he runs to Paris to his older brother, Georges, who's away covering the war in Kosovo. Angry, he throws a bag of half-eaten pastry into ... See full summary »
A European family who plan on escaping to Australia, seem caught up in their daily routine, only troubled by minor incidents. However, behind their apparent calm and repetitive existence, they are actually planning something sinister.
A 14-year-old video enthusiast is so caught up in film fantasy that he can no longer relate to the real world, to such an extent that he commits murder and records an on-camera confession for his parents.
Georges, who hosts a TV literary review, receives packages containing videos of himself with his family--shot secretly from the street--and alarming drawings whose meaning is obscure. He has no idea who may be sending them. Gradually, the footage on the tapes becomes more personal, suggesting that the sender has known Georges for some time. Georges feels a sense of menace hanging over him and his family but, as no direct threat has been made, the police refuse to help.... Written by
In the opening scene we see the Laurent residence from a stationary camera. Three roses are visible in a window box on the left. In the same setting late in the film after much passage of time, the roses are unchanged and in the same positions. See more »
Isn't it lonely, if you can't go out?
Why? Are you less lonely because you can sit in the garden? Do you feel less lonely in the metro than at home? Well then! Anyway, I have my family friend... with remote control. Whenever they annoy me, I just shut them up.
See more »
What was hidden was the plot...............you never find it
So much potential was wasted. This was neither disturbing or dark, but it was suspenseful. The viewer is drawn to watch the endless conversations, and the endless camera shots, in the hope of being given just enough to resolve what the heck is going on. Like a long joke with a pointless punchline you will be left sorely wanting, highly frustrated, and in my case laughing hysterically as to how you were drawn into the empty attempt at exploring guilt and acceptance. I do not need to have the entire story explained to me. Nor do I need all loose ends tied up. Deep thinking movies can indeed both inform and intrigue. This did neither. This movie was like an old relative you never want to talk to. They ultimately spend hours talking with nothing to say.
66 of 118 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?