at SnagFilms

Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsRunning with Arnold (2006) More at IMDbPro »
| Videos |
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writers:
Dan Cox (writer)
Jerry Decker (writer)
Release Date:
October 2006 (USA) more
Genre:
Plot:
A documentary on Arnold Schwarzenegger's gubernatorial campaign in California. | add synopsis
NewsDesk:
(2 articles)
Red Envelope is 'Running' with Schwarzenegger documentary
(From ioncinema. 1 November 2007)
Baldwin Pulls Out of "Nazi" Arnie Film
(From WENN. 2 November 2006)
User Comments:
A crude hatchet job. Not worth your time, even if you hate Schwarzenegger. more (2 total)
Cast
(Credited cast)| James Adomian | ... | Himself | |
| Danielle Craig | ... | Herself | |
| Arnold Schwarzenegger | ... | Himself (archive footage) |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
Pumping Politics (USA) (working title)
more
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
USA:72 min
Country:
Language:
Color:
Filming Locations:
Company:
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (2 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Running with Arnold (2006)| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| absolute trash | schull |
| Alec Baldwin narration deception | DarrenDirt |
| Good Arnold | WhatScreenNaime |
Recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Commune | Our Brand Is Crisis | I Want to Destroy America | An Inconvenient Truth | Gimme Shelter |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Documentary section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |


My expectation of this documentary was that it would cover Arnold Schwarzenegger's run for governor, or political career in traditional "fly on the wall" style.
This was not the case, which would be perfectly all right, but for the fact that this so called 'documentary' doesn't actually appear to have any original research put into it at all. A better title would be 'A Tabloid History of Arnold" with the movie (if I can call it that) being laid out not in the order that the events took place, but rather, being shown in the order that unflattering material was brought to light in the press.
I suppose that it is possible that the revelations are revealed in true documentary style, in the order that the maker found them, but if this is the case, then this film is a history by the California Democratic Party's opposition research department. In fact, the 'documentary' is narrated and constructed like one long and painfully drawn out political ad, and the perspective laid out is so limited and blatantly political that the hyperbole is occasionally the most interesting/amusing thing about it. My favorite narrator quote: "Unlike today, back at the turn of the century (meaning the late 1890's & early 1900's), the 'Golden State' was swimming in corruption".
It isn't necessary to have even the slightest amount of sympathy for Schwarzenegger to be annoyed by this silly production. The omnipotent narrator rants and rants, and even a series of weirdly irrelevant 'talking head' quotes by comedians cannot inject life into this dull and pedantic piece.
Needless to say, the film is not really fair to Arnold, suggesting for example that the only reason that he would oppose banning nutritional supplements was that the makers of some of them advertised in bodybuilding magazines that he edits (as if you could find any bodybuilder who is opposed to nutritional supplements) but bias is by no means the most important criticism of this film.
A highly opinionated documentary can be a good thing, but this is an unoriginal and crude bit of political hackery, and nothing more. It is quite possible that the majority of criticisms in this production are factually true, if for no other reason than that it appears that the filmmakers actually discovered none of them, but any facts found in this film are so smothered in crude invective that its hard to rely on this film for either information or entertainment.