| Page 1 of 23: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 223 reviews in total |
282 out of 353 people found the following review useful:
One of the Most Deeply Affecting Movies I've Seen in a Long Time, 29 November 2008
![]()
Author:
brocksilvey from United States
It's virtually impossible to summarize my feelings on "Synecdoche, New
York." This astonishing brain teaser from the mind of Charlie Kaufman
affected me deeply, probably more than any film I've yet seen this
year. I can't say it's necessarily enjoyable, because it's full of
uncomfortable, brave truths about what it means to be human, and it
goes places most movies don't dare to. But watching it is a bracing
experience, and it's encouraging to know that there are still
filmmakers willing to use film as a means of challenging their
audiences and picking at scabs that most people would prefer to remain
solidly in place.
I can't begin to tell you what "Synecdoche, New York" means, and it
wouldn't matter anyway, because I think it will mean different things
to different people. A basic summary goes something like this: Philip
Seymour Hoffman plays a morose, depressed theatre director who's
convinced that fatal diseases are lurking around every blood vessel,
and who decides to stage a monstrous, ambitious theatrical work that
will leave him remembered after he dies. Soon, the work as he's staging
it becomes confused with the life he's living, so that he finds himself
directing a version of himself through a story that seems to be made up
as it moves along.
If this sounds like an act of mental masturbation by a pretentious
intellectual with too much time on his hands, rest assured:
"Synecdoche, New York" is not one of THOSE films. I didn't become
impatient with Kaufman or his characters, like I have with some of his
previous projects. In fact, this film made me uneasy because of how
much of it I DID relate to. The conclusions it draws are that we are
all alone in this big universe, life doesn't necessarily have any
meaning other than what one brings to it, and there is not a higher
power who is going to make sure our passage through the world makes
sense. It was a bit of a wake up call to hear these beliefs, beliefs
that I happen to share, stated so boldly, for while I'm confident in
what I believe, that confidence doesn't make the beliefs themselves any
less scary.
But depressing and nihilistic as those beliefs might sound, the film is
life affirming in its own way. It suggests that too many of us spend
too much time trying to make sense of the world and not enough time
living in it. We pull back in loneliness and fear when faced with
things bigger than ourselves rather than turning to those who can
actually help, namely the other human beings with whom we share our
time on this planet.
"Synecdoche, New York" will not likely find a big audience, as most
people will either not want to work at understanding it or won't like
what it has to say. But if you're willing to go into it with an open
mind, you might just find yourself amazed.
Grade: A+
137 out of 201 people found the following review useful:
Phenomenal, 5 December 2008
![]()
Author:
loveseedgems from United States
To start, let's make it clear that this movie will not be for everyone;
I don't think any form of authentic art is. There is no flaw in this
truth or in the people who do or do not find themselves moved by the
art in question- it just is.
I do believe there are people who more intuitively and naturally
reflect inward, on death, on life- the meanings of all these things; it
is a natural state for them. And I believe there are people as equally
blessed and cursed to not think very deeply on these matters. I think
this film will find a comfortable home in the hearts of the former.
Now, of these "inner seekers"- I believe you have all variations of
folks- those that seek deeply and find beauty, connection, and great
joy. There are those seek deeply and find isolation, grief, and deep
wells of sadness. There are those who find some semblance of balance
between the two. I myself lean more towards connection, and subsequent
joy because of that
I found this movie to be profoundly moving- on
almost a primordial level- and I believe- in a hopeful way. Don't get
me wrong, I cried many times during the movie and didn't want to leave
the theater when the film was finished. I held back the wells of
whatever it was that was welling up in me until I got to my car and
then unloaded some body shaking tears. It wasn't sadness, though
it
was
something else. I don't really know yet. One thing I do know is
that all of Kaufman's films seem to affect me in this manner. After the
initial viewing- I know distinctly how the movie has affected me
emotionally- I can FEEL it. I am not capable of defining that feeling,
or explaining why that feeling has erupted (it is clear to everyone
that his plot and content are generally all over the board and it
usually takes several viewings to pull any real intellectual analysis
from them)- but I certainly am conscious of something new and fresh
happening inside my emotional hard wiring. I find that a phenomenal
feat in the face of a sea of art which relies on very standardized ways
of pulling it's consumers in emotionally. Do you remember how you felt
after Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind? I remember walking out and
feeling very hopeful about the nature of love- in a whole brand new
way. Not in the contrived, standardized Sleepless in Seattle kind of
way
not to judge that- but there is something amazing about an artist
who can make you feel things you are not sure you've felt before. That,
to me, is authentic art. This really isn't about valuing one thing more
than another- just offering great respect to someone who has taken your
mind and heart to places it hasn't been before. It is nice to visit
those old comfortable haunts, but this
well, like all of Kaufman's
films- will take you somewhere entirely new- if you are predisposed to
that kind of wandering.
148 out of 225 people found the following review useful:
Kaufman's Most Ambitious Film, 18 October 2008
![]()
Author:
SeraphZero from United States
I got to see a screening of this in Boston, and let me admit to the
fact that I consider this film a masterpiece. It is a rare entry into
the market: an ambitious film, a gamble that, sadly, makes me question
how much success it could garner in the mainstream box-office.
Charlie Kaufman, however, is not a screenwriter/director who inherently
aims his sights on the box-office or the mainstream (anybody who
questions this has to question Being John Malkovich). Instead, his
greatest strength is a boundless creativity and insight into the
qualities of humanity, and Synecdoche, New York is no exception.
Rather, it is the apex of Kaufman at his most insightful, his most
ambitious, and (as his directorial debut) his most hauntingly
beautiful.
The plot itself is a contradiction of simplicity and complexity: to say
that it is about Philip Seymour Hoffman trying to put on a larger than
life play is an accurate statement, yet it completely fails to capture
what Synecdoche, New York tries to convey. It is not a conventional
film, but instead it is ambitious: a mixture of conventional narrative
and surrealist cinema, one where the beauty of the film does not solely
lie upon the plot, but the way every minute quality of the film ties
together to form the tapestry.
The actors all do their parts brilliantly. I am hard-pressed to find
any performance that was weak or, for that matter, standard of the
Hollywood formula. Hoffman is brilliant in a role that utilizes his
physical and acting gifts, and he takes the character through the
spectrum of its possibilities. All the other actors also performed
brilliantly, although what struck me as wonderful about the acting
choices are that the majority of the actors present are not
"glamorized" for the screen. Rather, the blemishes, the age, and the
imperfections that make them ordinary are ever present in the film,
making Synecdoche, New York seem beautiful in a strange, "dirty" way.
Much like a city, its majesty lies not in grungy street corners or
clogged rain gutters, but in the whole image that is comprised of such
small, necessary imperfections.
And that, ultimately, is why Synecdoche, New York is such an ambitious,
beautiful film. It is not a perfectly crafted standard screenplay, nor
a perfectly executed piece of cinema. At least, Kaufman's work is not
perfect under the current criteria of modern cinema. Synecdoche, New
York is a gamble; a mixture of images and music and dialogue and acting
that follows Kaufman's heart and his meditations on several ideas:
namely, those on life and death and the connections all around us. It
is dark yet funny, evocative and haunting. It is perfect in being a
work of art that tempts us to find explanation, yet ultimately needs
none compared to the feelings they evoke in us.
Viewers who are looking to see the difference between "art" and
"entertainment" need only see Synecdoche.
131 out of 200 people found the following review useful:
Brilliant and bizarre!, 11 October 2008
![]()
Author:
toologize
What a trip. You can't expect a conventional picture from Charlie
Kaufman, but this was super weird! So weird that half the people left
the theatre before the end, either confused or offended by what they
saw. Poor Charlie witnessed the whole scene and I suspect it really got
to him.
The film's very much Spike Jonze in style, but grander and more
ambitious than Malkovich and Adaptation. The first hour is hilarious,
next half an hour is still good and you're struggling not to lose
threads, the last half an hour gets really messy and tends to drag a
bit. It might be due to Charlie's inexperience as a director, or it
might be intentional and a means to express one of the points of the
film (futility and dragging of time), or the topics simply grew too
difficult to deal with, but it seems to me that the last part could
have been made a bit more compact for a stronger impression. Seven to
ten minutes less would have helped, if that was possible.
Perhaps Jonze would have done a better job in terms of pacing and
craftsmanship, but the content is still really strong. The film had
been five years in the making and you can feel the issues that Kaufman
wanted to address brimming over. Illness, death, transience, love,
relationships, passion, devotion, art, theatre, identity, hope, so many
topics dealt with in a painfully sincere way. You both laugh and get
emotionally affected all the time along with being confused by the
twists of the plot and the grotesqueness of the imagery. You get many
'this is so true' moments that you completely identify with and then
you suddenly get struck by a completely surreal scene. The film
certainly reinforced my impression of Kaufman as a bastard son of Woody
Allen and Tom Stoppard.
The cast is wonderful. Philip Seymour Hoffman has to be singled out for
his magnificent performance. I have never been much of a fan of his and
I was somewhat bothered by the idea of him as a lead in the next
Kaufman movie. I didn't think he had a presence for that, but did he
prove me wrong! Appearing in virtually every scene, the man has carried
this film on his shoulders. He has created a completely lovable and
ludicrous character and conveyed Kaufman's ideas splendidly.
Catherine Keener is as fun and adorable as ever! As a fan, I was really
overwhelmed by this experience. I saw it two nights in a row, and spent
hours discussing it with friends. The film is a bit difficult to
comprehend instantaneously and Kaufman himself insists it requires a
second watching. It is an amazing picture, rarely thought-provoking,
and I can't wait to see it for the third time.
73 out of 95 people found the following review useful:
A thought-provoking, challenging Kaufman experience., 20 December 2008
![]()
Author:
commandercool88 from United States
syn⋅ec⋅do⋅che: a figure of speech in which a part is used for the whole
or the whole for a part, the special for the general or the general for
the special 'Synecdoche, New York' marks Charlie Kaufman's directorial
debut. A monumental event on its own right. It is a maddening venture,
a staggering project to face life's greatest of mysteries. Kaufman
takes us on a soul-searching journey, one that he is taking every bit
as much as we. It is a trip unlike any I have ever seen, and to say
that I enjoyed it would be a very difficult thing to say. But
'Synecdoche' seems to be pointing towards something very profound, as
undecipherable as it may appear. A flawed masterpiece, and a risk
Kaufman seems willing to take.
There's nothing easy about 'Synecdoche', it is one of the most
difficult films I've sat through. It's the sprawling story of one man's
life, a tragic life. Philip Seymour Hoffman gives a harrowing
performance as his character attempts to create a play of realism and
honesty. And even as he dives head first into his work, his own life is
in a perpetual state of free fall. A wife who leaves him, a daughter
out of his life, relationships that crash and burn. His play, inside a
warehouse where he has reconstructed New York City for people to live
our their ordinary lives, becomes a fruitless and maddening descent
into unhappiness and destruction.
What is 'Synecdoche' about? Is it one man's search for meaning in the
midst of meaninglessness? That in order to appreciate the preciousness
of life, we must accept the inherent chaos. Existence is what we make
of it, and it is the choices we make that shape and define who we are
and the lives we lead. Every choice brings with it a million different
consequences, some seen and others that go unnoticed.
Kaufman tells us we are one in a world of many. We each play a starring
role in the story of our life. People we meet every day, those we know
and love. Never will we truly know them, their thoughts, or why they do
what they do. And maybe it's not up to us to decipher what we will
never understand. We must look inward, not to others, to find peace and
insight.
If life is a play, the world is our stage. We only have this one shot,
no second chances. We try to control our projectories, cast roles that
need to be filled. In the end, what does it matter? Will the world miss
us when we're gone? Life is what you make of it. 'Synecdoche, New York'
dares to search for meaning, reconcile paradoxes to which there are no
answers. But that doesn't keep Kaufman from giving it his best, as
tedious and heart-wrenching as it may sometimes be.
More reviews:
rottentomatoes.com/vine/journal_view.php?journalid=219276&view=public
64 out of 90 people found the following review useful:
A challenging mess, 21 November 2008
Author:
John DeSando (jdesando@columbus.rr.com) from Columbus, Ohio
"All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players . .
."
Synecdoche, New York, like the literary term in its title, might stand
for all our lives as director Caden Cotard (Phillip Seymour Hoffman)
attempts a gigantic stage construction of to depict his tumultuous
life. Hamlet 2 it is notit's a serious attempt by cerebral and
creative writer Charlie Kaufman to deal with the muses and mistakes of
a life worth noticing, in this case where Caden has won a MacArthur.
Caden eventually creates a discursive and massive stage play peopled by
ex lovers who help him try to gain meaning out of a sometimes bleak
Brecht or Beckett landscape. Kaufman takes us into and out of time and
place, characters and ideas, so that to survive the viewing, we must
allow him to digress and symbolize to distraction. The recurring motif
of a house on the brink of burning down signifies the nearness of
insanity and even death.
The specter of Death overshadows all else and serves as a catalyst for
the artist's grand opus. It also allows him to muse on the meaning of
life and the challenges of art, the former leaning toward a pantheistic
notion that we are all made up of the people we have loved.
Shakespeare's notion of the world as stage is more appropriate here
than ever.
Artistically Kaufman is more in David Lynch land than anywhere else;
I'm comfortable with that although the producers should not wait for
the profits to roll in anytime soonit's a challenging mess.
Caden Cotard: "I know how to do it now. There are nearly thirteen
million people in the world. None of those people is an extra. They're
all the leads of their own stories. They have to be given their due."
106 out of 174 people found the following review useful:
Meet my friend, Paranoia, 20 September 2008
![]()
Author:
Giannis Palavos (giannispalavos) from Thessaloniki, Greece
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
"Synecdoche, New York" expands on the basic subject themes of all
Kaufman's work, but mostly on "Adaptation". And it makes "Adaptation"
look like an exercise for kids compared to this.
It's one of the best hypochondriac's film, one of the best films on
struggling with paranoia and, in the end, being defeated. It brought in
my mind some of Ingmar Bergman's characters and, of course, Woody
Allen's, but without the liberating sense of humor. Liberating for the
characters, that is. Here there is no salvation for the protagonist-
just like in Bergman's case.
The film flirts with being a bit pretentious, although it surely pokes
fun at nearly all the intellectual blah-blah and clichés one sees all
around the art world. So, I guess it rather saves itself that
accusation. If it only was 15 minutes shorter, then I wouldn't know
what to nag about.
It seems that Charlie Kaufman was not afraid to challenge his hip
followers, did a difficult to appreciate movie, dark, that really makes
your stomach and your brain hurt with with over-activity.
It's a great film.
71 out of 113 people found the following review useful:
Simulation Of Simulacra, 2 November 2008
![]()
Author:
Julian LaVerdiere from NYC
In a fit of pretentious grad-school psychobabble I once sarcastically
meta-critiqued a fellows students sculpture as being a "simulation of a
simulacra" Now looking back at it... I don't think I knew what I was
talking about, or why having crafted a "simulation of a simulacra"
would have been a bad thing?
After seeing synecdoche new york, I think I now have a tangible example
for that expression... and this film is going down as one of my all
time favorites! Kaufman & Hoffman are perfect doppelgangers! They
certainly complement each other better than Jim Carry, Nicolas Cage or
John Malcovich did. Kaufman has illustrated his self-reflexive neurosis
in a dark comedic way that has more angst and gravitas than Woody Allen
or Michel Gondry. The film was so existential and dark I swear I wanted
to cry at the end but was too perplexed. He portrays his life as a play
within a play and has created actors to play him self and others to
play those playing himself, like a hall of mirrors. There are moments
that become so interwoven that even Borges & Baudrillard would have a
hard time keeping track of the characters. In certain respects the film
reminded me of Shane Carruth's 2004 film Primer, in which the
protagonist has multiplied himself into a stupor that he needed to
write his own short term crib-notes to figure out what to do next. If
you haven't yet seen it .. run don't walk.
55 out of 84 people found the following review useful:
visionary, personal, deeply affecting, 19 December 2008
![]()
Author:
jim pyke from United States
One of the movies Synecdoche brought to mind for me was Bunuel's "The
Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie" in which two different actresses
play the same character with no explanation of any sort offered within
the narrative.
It's always refreshing to me to see events in movies occur without the
writer/director/actors seeming to feel any need to "explain it" to the
viewer. As with (m)any other filmmakers who are genuinely engaged with
film as a unique art form, it seems quite clear to me at least that
Kaufman requires the spectator to meet him on his own wavelength.
This is what a significant portion of artists in any medium do: they
take the constraints, conventions, and materials of their chosen form
very seriously and explore their own perceptions, ideas, and emotions
plying the tools of their medium on their own personal terms.
At the opposite end of this artistic spectrum is the sort of pandering
manipulation of a Spielberg or the painter Thomas Kincaid. Their works
are only "personal" in the sense that what is most prominently on
display in their work is their own desperate personal need to have
their intended message "understood" (and even experienced) by all
spectators in exactly the same way, so that "the artist" can in turn
feel his own personal worth has been validated by public and critical
responses - "Hah, I must be a great artist, because I succeeded in
making you think and feel the exact thing I wanted you to!"
I'll grant that this "spectrum" is a very broad one, and I won't
discount the work of anyone along it, but that doesn't mean I have to
enjoy things I see as technically accomplished hackwork. I don't, and
never will.
I'll take an artist who refuses to telegraph his "statement" to me any
day. I prefer works that wash over me, entrance me, and lead me down
paths to new or long-buried thoughts and feelings.
I feel GREAT after having seen Synecdoche this evening. I laughed, I
cried, and I see the world just a little differently now. I feel like a
group of people I have never met (Kaufman and the others involved in
making this wonderful movie) shared something with me that was very
important to them. I wish I could thank them, because I think it takes
a great deal of courage to share with others things that are so
personally important in such an honest, unapologetic way.
I think it also takes a lot of courage for investors to throw millions
of dollars at such a personal vision. It gives me hope for humanity
that such a thing is possible.
The Day the Earth Stood Still gave me a tiny little glimmer of this
sort of hope last weekend. But that movie was like a vending machine
bag of chips compared to the full-course-meal of Synecdoche New York.
36 out of 49 people found the following review useful:
to call it a disappointment might almost be a compliment, but I dare you to see it, 8 November 2008
![]()
Author:
MisterWhiplash from United States
Note: This works MUCH better on a repeat viewing, practically a
masterpiece, and one of the perfectly sad comedies ever made... though
the last ten minutes is a slog (perhaps intentionally, as it's near the
end of the tunnel... but it's still unbearable).
Over the course of my teenage years I've seen Being John Malkovich
through Eternal Sunshine (those two the M-word, masterpieces, with
Adaptation and Confessions of a Dangerous Mind near-great, and Human
Nature a fun minor work), and he's always given something to chew on
for the brain. He's an incredible wit, maybe too incredible, like
something that could combust with the amount of ideas and ruminations
and skill at defining what's important to us as people and what we want
out of art. Synecdoche, New York could be seen as his life-summation of
what concerns him as a writer. And to call it art is simple, because it
is: it is, alongside the something like Inland Empire, the most
challenging work to come out of American cinema. To say that either one
is flawed may come as something as a given, but for Kaufman it's
somewhat more troubling.
This is a big film of ideas, crucial, life-affirming (or life-damning)
thoughts about love and death and loss and forgiveness and,
essentially, the process of trying to recreate and recreate and
recreate this. But at the same time the intellect to engage full-tilt
by Kaufman the writer, the director couldn't engage me as a viewer
emotionally - at least at first. This changed on a second viewing - I'm
reminded of Woody Allen's assertion on multiple viewings of 2001 that
Kubrick was much ahead of him on what he was doing - but on a first
impression I have to wonder, with everything going for Kaufman the
satirist, the original, the sad dramatist, what the movie's audience
really is. Like the play that is rehearsed for decades that Cotard
never brings to his audience, what can one take away from Synecdoche,
New York as far as connecting with the characters, or just Cotard?
Maybe it reveals something about me just talking about this; indeed
this is probably the film of the season, if not just the year (Dark
Knight fanatics take note), that you will want to talk about after it
ends. As far as puzzling works of art go it's great for a good
argument, especially if one is familiar with how Kaufman's work has
been leading up to this point. It's not exactly that the film is ever
so confusing that one will want to walk out - there is a logic, in a
sense, to the life imitating art imitating life imitating art etc etc
aspect that makes sense.
When Kaufman, as director, makes his film this time about as hopeful as
Franz Kafka rewatching the Zapruder film on a loop, even the scenes and
moments that *do* feel somewhat powerful emotionally (i.e. Hoffman
seeing his daughter in a nudie-booth, or the final scene on the bed
with Hoffman and Morton old and in bed with the house, once again, on
fire) don't hit their mark - again, at least at first. It's almost as
if seeing the film again it becomes deeper, more resonant; like any
work of art at another point in one's life, it could change, and if one
gives it the chance it does.
Certainly the cast makes it worthwhile to watch: Hoffman is what he is,
brilliant at transforming physically as age goes by as Caden Cotard,
and at delivering subtle moments of humor amid his health-decay; ditto
in her own right to Morton, who ranges from bubbly and lustful to anrgy
and dejected (Michelle Williams, too, shows this range); even a bit
part by Dianne Wiest is appreciated. They all help to give life to what
is a big, somber meditation on (quoting Douglas Adams) Life, the
Universe, and Everything.
And yet, expressing my (initial) disappointment over the length (at 124
minutes it feels twice as long) or the music (did Kaufman order
"kill-myself-piano-tunes-you'll-love off of ebay for this?) or the
personal problem of connecting emotionally with some of the characters
as they (intentionally) don't really grow, shouldn't, I hope, diminish
recommending Synecdoche, New York for anyone who wants something to
challenge them, provoke thought and discourse, to engage and disrupt
brainwave patterns. Perhaps there should be some disappointment; like
life, and the art pulled out of it with pliers, it's not always a
pretty sight, especially near the end. But it is a unique journey I was
glad to take, and I hope every few years or so to come back to it, and
see if it changes me, or if I've changed, since seeing it last.
| Page 1 of 23: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |