| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Index | 52 reviews in total |
77 out of 103 people found the following review useful:
A really nice indie movie!, 27 March 2010
![]()
Author:
dkatsafouros from Athens Greece
First of all I'm a bit curious about the low rating of the movie here
(6,4). This is a great movie raising all sorts of questions to the
viewer. Which is what a good movie is supposed to do. Identity, sense
of belonging, isolation, and the essence of the human nature are just
some of the things the movie touches on. Yeah there are plot points
that have been explored before in other movies but seriously who cares?
It's how you portray those situations and plot. So I wasn't
disappointed there. In fact I wasn't disappointed at all!! A brilliant
film that will speak to the audience that loved, "moon".
Congrats to all the people involved in this movie. Hope someday it'll
be released on Bluray.
41 out of 50 people found the following review useful:
Cargo packs in substance and style, 24 May 2010
![]()
Author:
katepsimmons from United States
As breathtaking as it is substantial, Swiss film Cargo is what good
science fiction should be: compelling, artistic and effective. One of
the film's many strengths is its hypnotic quality. From the opening
scenes of an alluring foliage-laden planet that characters hope to
settle in lieu of an uninhabitable Earth, viewers are pulled into a
world of meticulously-crafted sights and sounds.
The story of Dr. Laura Portmann (Anna-Katharina Schwabroh) soon
unfolds, and her journey as a medic on cargo ship Kassandra quickly
turns mysterious when it becomes clear she's not the only one awake
during her lonely shift. The plot increases in complexity as details
are revealed, but its not what happens that gives the film its power.
It's the way the discoveries are revealed.
Characters travel crowded corridors that reference and live up to
science fiction's finest (hello, Ridley Scott)! Dripping water,
fan-scattered light and layered audio work alternate between backdrop
and foreground, heightening suspense and making the film's world all
the more tangible. Directors Ivan Engler and Ralph Etter also bring
signature elements to the table, such as the prevalent cold temperature
on the ship and the eerie gel that surrounds characters as they enter
cryo sleep.
Also noteworthy is the way Cargo manages to be simultaneously epic and
personal. There is action and there is scope, but there is also
poignancy. Science fiction fans will recognize that this is rare, which
is likely a part of why many viewers have embraced this film with such
excitement.
It's not often that a science fiction film of this caliber finds its
way to viewers, and, as one lucky audience at this year's South by
Southwest Film Festival discovered, seeing this gem on the big screen
is magic. Hopefully Cargo will get the American theatrical release it
deserves.
Note: I reviewed this film for Suite101.com
42 out of 53 people found the following review useful:
Interesting and mysterious, but somewhat problematic, 14 December 2010
![]()
Author:
samkay1 from Canada
Cargo is dazzling, mystifying, sometimes scary, and is able to
manipulate a rather familiar plot to seem less familiar. That last one
however, is just as much a weakness as it is a strength. The film's
problems are not on the screen, but on the pages.
Cargo contains a weighty story line, with questionable focus and a lack
of coherency. There are also places where the movie feels draggy and
repetitive. Characterization gets off the ground but not quite to the
degree of emotion that was probably intended.
Anyone who sees Cargo is gonna wish they had seen it in theatres. Its
greatest achievement is photography. I liked Cargo for its mystique and
stylistic choices, but the writing and construction need a tune up. Its
facade is perfect but its soul is murky, and its story is disoriented
which does not allow us to appreciate Cargo to the full.
75 out of 119 people found the following review useful:
Cargo - thrilling till the end, 15 December 2009
![]()
Author:
l-epting from Switzerland
When I watched the science fiction movie CARGO" I was astonished.
Cargo is a low budget movie with a superb look and an amazing story.
The film was entirely shot in Switzerland - a country not at all known
for producing science fiction movies.
The story is solid and involving. It develops steadily, gets more and
more momentum and works its way to a climax with some very nice twists
and breathtaking space scenes.
I was fascinated during the entire movie how these guys were able to
produce such a good looking film with so many special effects for such
a small budget. The sounddesign as well is an outstanding piece of art.
I recommend to watch "CARGO" in a theatre equipped with a very good
sound system.
"CARGO" is a must-see, it guarantees a lot of excitement.
58 out of 96 people found the following review useful:
A wonderful and touching movie ..., 8 October 2009
![]()
Author:
Laszlo Arato from Switzerland
Without spoiling anything, I want to recommend this movie as a real
thriller where nothing is as it seems, but everything makes sense in
the end. And it is a fresh look on a VERY IMPORTANT issue, giving a
wonderful but sad perspective on it.
If you like "big thinking" in SciFi, this movie will give you the
visuals on how huge things can get in zero gravity, with a beautiful
space city in the beginning and a cargo ship the size of the empire
state building.
While it is a little bit lengthy, I think this is a necessary part to
truly give you the cold and lonely feeling of space, and so to make you
appreciate the ending and conclusion.
Just keep sitting, and you will understand ...
Laszlo
19 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
Spectacular powerful beautiful terrifying, 8 December 2010
![]()
Author:
shootingangles from Canada
I'm so glad that I overlooked some of the poor responses posted about
this film and rented it.
I found it absolutely riveting - and beautiful.
The first few minutes recall aspects of the BladeRunner modern
cityscape - but on steroids, with the aid of modern day visual effects.
The plot is interesting and unfolds nicely keeping your interest and
attention. No big stars, no truly stellar performances, but the story
line is solid and I was so taken in by it, that I'm going to watch it
again tonight, with someone else who's not yet seen it. Some
mesmerizing visuals and scenarios. The lighting is particularly strong,
creating great ambiance and dramatic effect, without drawing too much
attention to itself. This movie is about human frailty, various
emotions and connections, about the work we do in order to follow our
dreams. It also relates feelings of being small, powerless, and
becoming disconnected because of technology - assessing trust in others
and in the systems which dominate our lives, searching for 'truth' and
authentic experiences...
A very unconventional melding of ideas which for me, worked on many
different layers.
Highly worth a trip for any Sci-Fi lover.
20 out of 25 people found the following review useful:
Hard to find fault sci-fi, 2 April 2011
![]()
Author:
Amadio from Japan
Take one part Matrix, one part Event Horizon, add half a measure of Alien, a dash of Solaris and gently stir. Cargo delivers what many sci-fi films fail to deliver these days, and that is real style as well as substance. It's easy to set a 'shoot-em-up' in space or a detective story, but Cargo has so much more. It's moody without being cloying, it's scary without cheap horror tactics, it's thought provoking, it delivers twists and turns, and it is not predictable. It is hard to classify Cargo as it has many elements, and this is what makes it so engrossing. The acting is believable i.e. being in space for a long time leads to quirky behaviour, people will do anything for a better life, and who can you trust? This is absolutely not a Hollyvoid film with predictable characters and lame values. Instead, Cargo delivers a thoughtful and absorbing film that ranks alongside classics such as Solaris (not the Clooney version).
21 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
a competent sci-fi, 31 August 2010
![]()
Author:
thisissubtitledmovies from www.subtitledonline.com
Switzerland's first attempt at sci-fi, and Ivan Engler's first feature
film, Cargo harks back to numerous icons of science fiction cinema
everything from The Thing to The Matrix, and, most notably, Ridley
Scott's Alien. It belongs to that particular breed of dystopian science
fiction where the world is ruined and the human race is living on
borrowed time.
Cargo is a competent sci-fi, but it's nothing special. The first half
is effectively tense and engaging, but it loses its way towards the
end. Visually stunning considering the budget, but unfortunately, it's
nowhere near original or creative enough to be considered a
particularly revolutionary sci-fi film. SSP
31 out of 50 people found the following review useful:
The weakest link in a chain detemins it's strength, 20 June 2010
![]()
Author:
Axel Gieck from Gießen Germany
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
OK, Fist of all: I was severely impressed by the fact that I could not
find an (what I thought to be) English original Soundtrack.. I was
misled by the looks of this movie as to be a lower budget Hollywood
offspring.. whoa, OK, so the Original Soundtrack is German..
interesting! Actually (as I learned now) it's swizz made.. Well
Swizerland is famous for cheese, and the main feature of most cheese
is.. holes in it! To bad the went with that..
First, I must say the props and the looks are very very good, and I
must also say more CGI would not have been necessary for me... but even
in the first 20 minutes I start noticing Logic holes that are just not
right.. Like: The Space station consists of rotating rings (the
rotation creates artificial gravity), but when our main character
enters the axis of such a Ring, she does not become weightless or
anything.. she just walks through there, OK, Door passed, thank you..
Although the Bulk door (and the camera zooms in on that to show this
nice detail) has a sign saying "beware of change of gravity (or such..)
But. Aaaahhh!! Logic! If I make the effort of creating such a nice
setup and details as the Rotating station (which use was explained back
in Stanley Cubricks 2001 Space Oddyssey), why don't I stay with it? OR
put in a feature that explains why she's not floating around..
.. and irrational acting of the characters.. Like in the scene where
she discovers the "Maschinenstürmer" Activist who is a stowaway on
board.. They Struggle, and someone shoots him, and the FIRST thing she
does is like taking a good look around.. going through the stuff she
finds.. not asking herself who just saved her life maybe? (the question
kind of comes up about 2 Minutes later.. but is never really given much
weight) Then, The oppressive regime that is obviously creating this
whole lie about Reha is not monitoring the data streams? hello??
Opressice Regime 101 is what? Like she can upload her (what must look
like from the perspective of the Regime) terrorist message right to the
Newsfeed of the Spacestation back close to earth to kick off a riot ?
Like she can share(via what i take as an equivalent of a cellphone)
very very confidential about what they just found in the Cargo section
(that they are not at all allowed to pen, but hey..) information with
her Sister, and no one notices this? The Ship has NO movement sensor
whatsoever to actually monitor the crew on the ship while only one
person is supposed to be on watch? And, yea, they travel 4 Years to an
ass end of Space, blow up some communication device.. and no one can
actually go there and Fix it, just to declare this another failed
attempt of the (from the oppressive regime POV) Terrorists..? There is
more of these Logic errors in there, Like Message traveling Time: It
was used at some point in the plot, and then totally ignored at
another. She notices the response time of her sister is increasing and
therefore that they are closing in on reha. She even discusses this
with the tech engineer who says "it usually takes months", but later
her Message from Reha back to earth about the truth of Reha is received
there almost instantly..
... and so on... I must say this really ruined the movie for me. It
could have been Great, the looks and the feel is super, the Story setup
is good, Nice twist in the story, the revealing of the true evil is
kind of foreseeable but still good, the acting is kind of stiff
sometimes, but OK... but the logic.. I can't go with that. And the
discrepancy between the bad Script writing's missing logic and the rest
of the movie is so huge! Like usually crappy scripts also have a crappy
looking movie and bad actors.. here. One aspect messes it up for the
rest.
So sad Axel
47 out of 82 people found the following review useful:
Space story in need of originality and more money., 10 October 2009
![]()
Author:
mikmikmik from Switzerland
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
First off, although I am in possession of a Swiss passport, I am in no
way inclined to believe that the Swiss have a genetic advantage when it
comes to filmaking, contrary to what many of my fellow citizens seem to
think.
Cargo is by no means a terrible piece of work, but suffers from
problems that should have been apparent when viewing the finished
movie. As any other director, Mr. Engler appears to have invested a
reasonable amount of time crafting a believable beginning, a first few
scenes creating a backdrop for the viewer in case things would start
falling apart. A gigantic space station rendered with respectable
detail (especially considering the budget of 5 million Swiss francs) is
shoved in the viewers face within a minute of the film's beginning,
which is fine, because it consists of spinning parts, shiny things, and
a ridiculous number of lights. This is where most humans now reside
after we've managed to turn the Earth into something about as habitable
as nuclear testing grounds.
All humans aboard this station have one goal in common, to scrape
together enough money to travel to the distant planet of Rhea, a place
that closely resembles certain pretty parts of Switzerland in Autumn
(coincidence?). The movie now begins to tell the tale of a small ship
on it's way to Rhea. Ultimately, in a series of undramatic events, we
find out that Rhea is actually a simulation and that the destination of
the ship is a docking station outside the planet that contains millions
of humans in a cryogenic state AND that the ship does not contain
building materials but instead people in boxes with pipes attached to
them. Whoever does not the see the parallel to the Matrix is kidding
themselves because this is more than an inspiration, this is almost a
blatant remake.
The issue not only lies in the premise of the movie, which is so overly
clichéd and, as mentioned, copied, that it brought a tear to my eye,
but also in the execution. It is obvious that the crew is in a small
ship solely because of a low budget. The same goes for the number of
actors that can be counted using both hands and one foot. The last half
hour of the movie is basically terrible, which is to a large part due
to the hilarious space suits worn by the actors (good luck finding a
role as an astronaut in the future, think 50's space suit with fur on
it), but also due to the terrible camera angles showing the actors in
their terrible space suits. There is an off-camera sex scene that is as
out of place as a racist joke at a funeral and I found it odd that the
voice acting of half of the crew members sounded as though it had been
dubbed from German to German by another man with more charisma. Then we
have the logical holes the size of meteor craters that can only be
explained by teleportation or magic. A man gets shot by another man
although the man with the gun was captured behind a closed metal door
before he shot the other man. Or what about the woman in the furry
astronaut suit managing to perfectly hit the suddenly extremely slow
moving space ship with her jetpack as its flying past her. By the way,
this same space ship has a insanely cool ability to become either ten
times larger or ten times smaller, depending if you're inside the ship
or looking at it from the outside. Kind of like those crazy tents they
have in Harry Potter. Would have been even more cool if it had been
intentional.
The biggest problem is that the story never seems to get going and I
didn't find it very exhilarating to watch the same woman walk through
the same dark corridors more times that I blink my eyes each day. It
all just seems a bit pointless and the supposedly epic ending just
falls short of being gripping in any way. Whilst I do take my hat off
for effort, this movie took 9 years to make, I'm going to go ahead and
make the bold statement that we Swiss should stick to making cheese and
chocolate and Hollywood can take care of film-making.
| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |