MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 57,127 this week

Why the Towers Fell (2002)

TV Movie  -   -  Documentary  -  30 April 2002 (USA)
7.2
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.2/10 from 78 users  
Reviews: 1 user

The exclusive story of the investigation into the mechanism of collapse of the World Trade Center.

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

W
a list of 692 titles
created 28 Nov 2012
 
a list of 1498 titles
created 20 May 2013
 
a list of 733 titles
created 01 Jan 2014
 
a list of 629 titles
created 01 Jan 2014
 
a list of 98 titles
created 04 Jan 2014
 

Related Items

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Why the Towers Fell (TV Movie 2002)

Why the Towers Fell (TV Movie 2002) on IMDb 7.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Why the Towers Fell.
1 win. See more awards »

Photos

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Jonathan Barnett ...
Himself - Professor: Fire Protection Engineering
Brian Clark ...
Himself - World Trade Center Survivor
W. Gene Corley ...
Himself - Structural Engineer (as Gene Corley)
Sal D'Agostino ...
Himself - Fireman and World Trade Center Survivor
Jan Demczur ...
Himself - World Trade Center Survivor
Bill Forney ...
Himself - World Trade Center Survivor
Matt Komorowski ...
Himself - Fireman and World Trade Center Survivor
Matthys Levy ...
Author
...
Narrator (voice)
Mike Meldrum ...
Himself - Fireman and World Trade Center Survivor
Paul Neal ...
Himself - World Trade Center Survivor
Jake Pauls ...
Himself - Building Safety Analyst
Stanley Praimnath ...
Himself - World Trade Center Survivor
Leslie Robertson ...
Himself - World Trade Center Engineer
Charles Thornton ...
Himself - Structural Engineer
Edit

Storyline

In the aftermath of the collapse, the questions came quickly and urgently: was it inevitable that such a severely damaged structure would completely collapse? Or was there something about the building's design or construction that made it especially susceptible to failure? What exactly caused that failure-fire, heat, internal damage? Was the evacuation plan adequate enough to save the maximum number of lives? And are other tall buildings just as vulnerable to collapse when the blast is great and the fire uncontrolled? In the gray wasteland of smoke and dust and mangled steel that was once the third tallest building in the world, forensic engineers began sifting the wreckage for clues and answers to these and other structural truths. This blue-ribbon team of engineers is nearing the end of its task, and NOVA has been there from the beginning, following its investigation of the causes of the calamity. Why the Towers Fell presents the engineers' conclusions in the most definitive ... Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Documentary

Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

Release Date:

30 April 2002 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Referenced in 911 Mysteries Part 1: Demolitions (2006) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

the fall of the WTC
6 August 2004 | by (Sydney, Australia) – See all my reviews

This BBC documentary uses footage of the erection of the World Trade Center, the 1993 bombing, Sept 11 and Ground Zero, graphics of the towers and the planes hitting them, and testimony from survivors, engineers, firemen, and the builder Leslie Robertson.

The WTC was built to overcome what was previously seen as drawbacks to older buildings like The Empire State Building, with a new approach to provide more usable floorspace. This was to make a steel outer skeleton which would bend in the force of the wind, a steel inner core of girders, and steel floor trusses that braced the skeleton to the core. However, the heat-resistant foam that coated the trusses and the drywall plasterboard are what ultimately weakened the towers to the attack, since they both were practically blown away by the jet fuel fire, which weakened the steel.

What is interesting is that while both towers eventually suffered "progressive collapse", as the floors pancaked, each tower fell for a specific different reason. The south tower (which fell first) fell because the outer skeleton snapped, but the north tower fell because the inner core collapsed. The differences were also due to the angles of the planes and the height of the floors that were impacted, and the comparative time that each tower endured their fires. Although experts disagree as to whether different truss connections in the design might have helped the towers withstand the impact, they agree that the length of time the towers stood is remarkable.

Whilst this treatment is primarily concerned with the engineering approach, there are also emotional touches - footage of the doomed inhabitants of the floors above the impact (though no one is seen to jump), the guilt of Robertson, whose office has a view of Ground Zero, and of the firemen who abandoned the south tower after the north fell. We are told that they had only reached floor 26 (they were headed for 93) when the call came to go back, however it seems careless to comment that even if they had reached their destination, there is little they could have done. We hear the story of two men who were trapped in a stalled elevator and who fought through the drywall to escape, and the ghoulish announcement made for workers to return to the south tower before the second plane hit, as some people had evacuated upon hearing of the first plane's impact.

Although the engineering agenda makes the mercenary footage of the burning towers acceptable, draining the color at times seems unnecessary and exploitative.






12 of 18 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Why the Towers Fell (2002) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?