Printed Media Reviews
Denby, David. The Current Cinema: Devilment. In: The New Yorker, 7 March 2005, Pg. 88-89, (MG)
Eriksson, Karoline. Skämten från Get Shorty går i repris (2/6). In: Svenska Dagbladet (Sweden), 15 April 2005, (NP)
Gillespie, Eleanor Ringel. Travolta and 'Get Shorty' sequel just don't measure up. In: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Atlanta, GA, USA), Atlanta Newpapers, Vol. 57, No. 63, 4 March 2005, h5, (NP)
Horwitz, Jane. Be Cool (PG-13, 112 minutes). In: The Washington Post (USA), Vol. 128, Iss. 89, 4 March 2005, Pg. 42, (NP)
Hunter, Stephen. 'Be Cool': Lukewarm, With a Touch of Chili. In: The Washington Post (USA), Vol. 128, Iss. 89, 4 March 2005, c1+c5, (NP)
Malloy, Mike. 'Be Cool' falls short of cool, falls short of 'Shorty'. In: The Marietta Daily Journal (Marietta, GA, USA), Times Journal Inc., Vol. 139, No. 63, 4 March 2005, Pg. 3d, (NP)
SChwarzbaum, Lisa. "Chili Con Corny (C+)". In: Entertainment Weekly (USA), Vol. 810, 11 March 2005, Pg. 77-78, (MG)
Thomson, Desson. 'Be Cool': A Chilly Reception. In: The Washington Post (USA), Vol. 128, Iss. 89, 4 March 2005, Pg. 41, (NP)
Travers, Peter. "Be Cool: A sad-sack sequel to 'Get Shorty (*)". In: Rolling Stone (USA), Vol. 970, 24 March 2005, Pg. 83, (MG)
Original Literary Source
Leonard, Elmore. Be Cool. New York: Delacorte Press, 1999,
0385333919
Essays
Andrew John Ignatius Vontz. "First Look: Be Cool". In: Premiere (USA), Vol. 17, Iss. 9, May 2004, Pg. 40, (MG)
Browse titles in the literature section by letter:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Other
