| Photos (See all 19 | slideshow) |
| Vladimir Garin | ... | Andrey | |
| Ivan Dobronravov | ... | Ivan | |
| Konstantin Lavronenko | ... | Otets | |
| Nataliya Vdovina | ... | Mat | |
| Galina Popova | ... | Babushka | |
| Aleksey Suknovalov | ... | Zavodila | |
| Lazar Dubovik | ... | Khuligan | |
| Elizaveta Aleksandrova | ... | Ofitsiantka | |
| Lyubov Kazakova | ... | Devushka v zerkalakh | |
| Andrey Sumin | ... | Chelovek v portu | |
| Aleksey Proshchikin | |||
| Viktor Alenin | |||
| Stas Orlov | |||
| Arseniy Belousov | |||
| Sofya Bagdasarova | |||
| Arseniy Bagdasarov | |||
| Alla Tomasheva | |||
| Evgeniy Belyanskiy |
Directed by | |||
| Andrey Zvyagintsev | |||
Writing credits(in alphabetical order) | ||
| Vladimir Moiseenko | writer | |
| Aleksandr Novototskiy-Vlasov | (as Aleksandr Novototskiy) | |
Produced by | |||
| Andrew Colton | .... | executive producer | |
| Elena Kovaleva | .... | executive producer | |
| Dmitriy Lesnevskiy | .... | producer | |
Original Music by | |||
| Andrey Dergachev | |||
Cinematography by | |||
| Mikhail Krichman | |||
Film Editing by | |||
| Vladimir Mogilevskiy | |||
Casting by | |||
| Geta Bagdasarova | |||
| Galina Dovgal | |||
Production Design by | |||
| Zhanna Pakhomova | |||
Costume Design by | |||
| Anna Bartuli | |||
Makeup Department | |||
| Galya Ponomaryova | .... | makeup artist | |
Second Unit Director or Assistant Director | |||
| Geta Bagdasarova | .... | assistant director: actors | |
| Svetlana Dyomina | .... | assistant director | |
| Anastasi Torlakyan | .... | assistant director (as Anastasiya Torlakyan) | |
| Inga Vasilyeva | .... | assistant director | |
Sound Department | |||
| Andrei Khudyakov | .... | sound | |
| Dmitri Nagorny | .... | sound re-recording mixer | |
Visual Effects by | |||
| Kirill Bobrov | .... | digital effects artist | |
| Dmitriy Tokoyakov | .... | visual effects supervisor | |
Stunts | |||
| Vladimir Sevostyanikhin | .... | stunt coordinator | |
Camera and Electrical Department | |||
| Aleksandr Bakrin | .... | steadicam | |
| Yevgeny Kiryukhin | .... | lighting technician | |
| Aleksey Konoplyov | .... | gaffer | |
| Denis Konoplyov | .... | lighting technician | |
| Aleksey Kozin | .... | lighting technician | |
| Vladimir Mishukov | .... | still photographer | |
| Aleksey Populov | .... | grip | |
| Viktor Saratov | .... | camera mechanic | |
| Maksim Shalnyov | .... | video equipment operator | |
| Aleksey Shipulin | .... | grip | |
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Drama section | IMDb Russia section |
This film's power is revealed in the contrast between the events as they play out and the questions generated by the enigmatic final moments. It worked firstly as a mysterious, psychological drama, but once the film had ended, it fit the definition of the term allegory perfectly.
"The Return" makes a compelling case in favor of a poetically complex narrative over the expectations of 'The Hollywood Ending', where life eventually makes some kind of sense. The absence of a father can create a psychological 'presence' for the family, both seen and felt in the emotional interaction of the children. This complex, yet all too human condition is played out here, not as a narrative sleight of hand (The Sixth Sense) but rather as film poetry. Life's hardest truths sit like a stone in the mouth and won't be broken down easily. The characters in this film seem to be struggling with the absence of their father, but doing so with him present.
Visual cues which seem to lead to a metaphorical reading of what's happening are scattered throughout the film. For example, when the the boys see their sleeping father for the first time, he's viewed as Andrea Mantegna's "Dead Christ". The boys dash upstairs immediately afterwords to see if he looks like their father from an old photo. It seems that it's been loosely placed in an old book of engravings - on the page where the angel stays Abraham's hand before he sacrifices his son. Then there is the repeated image of the tower, seeming to both foreshadow and justify a fear of death for the youngest brother. And the mysterious journey to an island, the significance of which changes them all. These don't appear as kitsch cues (as in, "this image stands for this specific idea.") but appear as symbols whose meaning is more poetic than literal. They're tied to the story and can't be extracted. In true Tarkovskian form the filmmaker has bled his symbols of universal references and made them about the characters.
And there's the profoundly enigmatic manner of the father, existing for the two brothers in terms of curt preoccupation, edicts, veiled threats, detachment and blunt instruction. He could very well not be there. This causes both boys to respond to him with a mix of outrage, incredulity and bitterness.
Its a rare film, well worth seeing, if for no other reason than to marvel at the elegiac force of the story, the photography and at the performances that the director managed to coax from his actors. Both the boys in particular are astonishingly subtle. Highly recommended.