6.7/10
170
13 user 7 critic

AfterLife (2003)

An ambitious Scottish journalist is torn between a high-profile career and caring for his younger sister who has Downs Syndrome.

Director:

Writer:

Reviews
4 wins & 4 nominations. See more awards »

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Afterlife (Video 2011)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

Paul Perry ponders the question 'what happens when we die?' through a series of interviews with subjects who have had near-death experiences, as well as renowned experts in the field of NDE research.

Director: Paul Perry
Stars: Paul Perry, Jeff Long, Raymond Moody
Afterlife I (TV Series 2005)
Drama | Horror | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

University lecturer Robert Bridge (Andrew Lincoln) becomes involved in a series of supernatural events surrounding medium Alison Mundy (Lesley Sharp) in this chilling TV series.

Stars: Lesley Sharp, Andrew Lincoln, Kate Duchêne
After.Life (2009)
Drama | Horror | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.9/10 X  

After a car accident, a young woman who is caught between life and death, meets a funeral director who appears to have the gift of transitioning the dead into the afterlife.

Director: Agnieszka Wojtowicz-Vosloo
Stars: Christina Ricci, Liam Neeson, Justin Long
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

A German rocket scientist arrives on a small Scotish island in the mid 1930s. He's there to run tests on a new type of rocket that is to be used for mail delivery between the island and the... See full summary »

Director: Stephen Whittaker
Stars: Ulrich Thomsen, Shauna Macdonald, Gary Lewis
Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

Two American mafiosi, Gino and Settimo, take refuge in the Glasgow cafe owned by their Scottish/Italian cousin. But cousin Roberto isn't the tough guy they'd expected. His strengths are ... See full summary »

Director: Don Coutts
Stars: Danny Nucci, Shirley Henderson, Gerald Lepkowski
After Life (1998)
Drama | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

After death, people have just one week to choose only a memory to keep for eternity.

Director: Hirokazu Koreeda
Stars: Arata Iura, Erika Oda, Susumu Terajima
Afterlife (2018)
Fantasy
Director: Tony Kaye
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
May Brogan
...
Kenny Brogan
Paula Sage ...
Roberta Brogan
...
Professor Wilkinshaw
...
Ruby
Fiona Bell ...
Lucy
Antony Strachan ...
Mike (as Anthony Strachan)
Emma D'Inverno ...
Rosa Mendoza
...
Jez Walters
...
Dr Jackson
Stuart Davids ...
Big Tony
Julie Austin ...
Heather Foghorn
Martin Carroll ...
Bingo manager
Maureen Carr ...
Cissie
Molly Innes ...
Social worker
Edit

Storyline

An ambitious Scottish journalist is torn between a high-profile career and caring for his younger sister who has Downs Syndrome.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

f rated | See All (1) »

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

13 August 2004 (UK)  »

Also Known As:

Após a Morte  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Color:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Fails at the screenplay level; poor dialogue and a terrible closing scene

`AfterLife' is about a somewhat arrogant, reasonably wealthy man who discovers that his mother is dying, and finds himself looking after his sister, who has Down's Syndrome. He can't be bothered with her, and basically just wants to get her off his hands; he has better things to do. At one point he finds that he has to take her, by car (she doesn't like flying) across the country.

If that all sounds familiar to you, it is probably because you have seen `Rainman,' a film far superior to its imitator, `AfterLife.' That it copies the basic premise (heck, it nicks a few characters and even scenes too) is not the fundamental problem with the film. The fundamental problem is that I did not care about these characters.

The brother, Kenny (Kevin McKidd), is a bit of a womaniser. He has a girlfriend who comes and goes in the story, and who learns to like the Down's Syndrome sister (again, this is taken from `Rainman'). He is a journalist, trying to get an interview with a doctor who is facing a scandal. When he ends up looking after Roberta, the sister, he doesn't have much time for her, and sometimes leaves her alone for a little too long. When she wanders off, he becomes even angrier towards her. Am I spoiling anything by saying that he becomes a nicer, loving person by the end of the film?

Roberta is not determined to be 'normal'; she is 'normal,' and wishes people would stop treating her differently. She is played by Paula Sage, an actress who does have Down's Syndrome, and her performance is easily the best thing about the film; why did the screenwriter not explore her character more? Well, probably because that would mean the characters would get in the way of the story. When we surely already know the story anyway, didn't the filmmakers see the problem they were creating?

For a film about a dying mother and her handicapped daughter (the father is absent; I think he is dead, but I'm not sure), it is surprising how little impact the film has on the emotions of the viewer. The scenes are performed in such a standard, dull way, with such standard, predictable dialogue, that I found myself rolling my eyes.

I have nothing against sentimentality in films, but it only really works if you care about the characters. Here the characters are so uninteresting and two-dimensional that I didn't really think there was much to care about. `Rain Man' has an emotional climax, but that moved me, because I cared about the characters.

Talking of climaxes, this film has a stinker. There is sequence at the end of the film that starts off as an unbelievable situation and ends up in even worse territory; an unforgivably cruel trick is played on the audience. The sequence is designed to move the audience, but ends up being horribly manipulative and offending the intelligence of the viewer. Audiences aren't stupid, and they know when the film is cheating. What a cheap shot.

There is not one scene in this film that has the impact it should. There are a few sequences that are funny, yes, but when the characters talk to each other, I can practically see the screenplay in front of me, moving predictably and uninterestingly, never hitting anything that touches the mind or the heart. There are those phoney arguments that are reserved especially for the movies, where the other character knows exactly what the reply is. Why don't supposedly 'realistic' films not realise that, in real life, anger can be irrational, and sometimes people can't express their emotions, and they might say things that don't make sense, or not be able to say anything at all? All of the actors in this film deserve better material. This film is not based on fact, but I think a documentary on a family with a Down's Syndrome member would be much more interesting. That way, we might have had truth and emotion. For some reason the characters in this film think that an emotion only involves saying something loudly and making a suitable facial expression.

** (out of 5)


4 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?