30 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :- 10/10, 2 August 2004
Author:
desperateliving from Canada
What could only be titled as Cinema of the Ridiculous, Maddin's latest
masterpiece, about a no-legged beer queen who hosts a Winnipeg-set
competition to see which nation has the saddest music in the world, is
filled to the gills with wacky ideas, but the reason it's a great film is
because of the heartfelt feeling behind it. Maddin's genuine love for the
silent cinema that he emulates (and attachment to the pathetic characters he
creates) makes it possible for him to sustain a comic tone without it ever
becoming mocking.
Maddin manages to balance the grotesque comic caricature of Mark McKinney as
the shady mustached businessman who tries to win the competition, and Maria
de Medeiros, who gets life advice from her tapeworm, with the pathetic goth
character that's McKinney's brother, who's had to deal with the loss of a
son, and the glamorous Isabella Rossellini, who's had to deal with the loss
of her legs. (I wonder if the fact that Rossellini lost her legs in a car
accident caused by her performing fellatio is a nod to the Myth of Murnau.)
There's almost a subliminal melodrama taking place with the theme of loss
and hilarious depression (during The Depression). It's an exciting movie
visually, but unlike the best of the silents that Maddin loves, it's not
poetic in that slow, beautiful way -- it's too fast-paced, kinetic, and
rough to achieve any sort of traditional beauty -- but it is a feast. The
few scenes of gaudy color -- reds, blues, and odd flesh tones -- are as
grainy as the black and white. Maddin is truly one of the most imaginative
of directors and he has a firm grasp of the medium. In fact, there is at
least one scene of slow, beautiful poetry -- a purely silent moment, near
the end, that comes alongside the bloody murder of Rossellini's screams.
10/10
24 out of 28 people found the following comment useful :- Visually fascinating, but somewhat empty., 24 June 2004
Author:
Admiral_Forrest from Charlottetown, Canada
I had always been told that director Guy Maddin did nothing
conventionally, and so I approached The Saddest Music in the World with
anticipation and hesitation. I am a great fan of Isabella Rossellini
and Maria de Medeiros, both of whom do well in this picture. Maddin
delivers a picture that is quite beautiful visually; all in black and
white, and edited in such a way as to recall something resurrected from
the 1930s. There are a few occasions when colour is allowed in, and
those moments dazzle. One of the most striking images I have seen all
year is Isabella Rossellini posing in Technicolour standing on glass
legs filled with beer. It's something that has to be seen to be
believed. However, once you get past the visuals, the film is rather
empty and lacks heart. I do recommend it, though, because everyone
should see something new and different (and for Isabella and Maria).
25 out of 31 people found the following comment useful :- So funny I immediately bought another ticket, 1 May 2004
Author:
Paul Klenk (paulklenk) from New York, NY
The credits rolled last night at 11:50 PM at the Sunshine on Houston
Street
in NYC.
Outside the theatre, I glanced up at the box office board: There was
another
viewing at 11:55 p.m. I impulsively bought another ticket and saw it
again.
This is one of the funniest, most original and absurd movies I have ever
seen. I feel like I can't believe I've actually seen it -- waking up dizzy
at 2 PM today on a Saturday and pondering this movie.
All I remember is the wonderful music, the great one-liners, and those
fanciful legs. Oh, for legs such as those!
Everyone must be forced to sit through this film as punishment for
watching
any television, ever.
Isabella Rossilini should be so proud of forging through the offers of
banal
roles and accepting roles such as this. It is not a surprise that the same
actresss who allowed David Lynch to strip and bruise her in Blue Velvet
would embrace such a role as Port-Huntley. If you're sad, and like beer,
she's your woman!
The audience last night was howling with laughter and delight at the
absurd
and brilliant lines in this movie. There was so much to like about this
spectacular musical.
But most of all, there were those intoxicating legs.
14 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :- Terrific Satire-Comedy, 16 July 2004
Author:
FlickeringLight from Boerne, TX
I saw Guy Maddin's film last weekend, not really knowing much about it other
than it's premise, which was too absurd to pass up. A double amputee
parapalegic beer baroness with glass legs filled with her own beer holding a
contest during Prohibition to find the saddest music in the world? Where do
people come up with this stuff?
The film is an interesting conglomeration of styles from films before and
around the era in which it is set. The 8 mm footage with the stereopticon
lens is reminiscent of the earliest films, and the distorted sets created in
a studio are reminiscent of the German expressionist films. This is
combined with a 30's musical and conversational style, including bits of
"Technicolor" thrown in for good measure. I would have to see the film
again, but I would like to go back and see it again to determine the link
between the scenes which are suddenly shot in color as compared to the
grainy black and white images that grace the rest of the
film.
Despite the quizzical looks from the three fellow moviegoers who occupied
the theatre, I found myself laughing out loud quite a few times at the
film's caustic humor. The matches between the music from each country are
like something out of a gangland film, with each side advancing toward each
other menacingly during their performance. Some of the countries who
perform in the competition reflect Maddin's satirical side, including a
winning performance from Serbia (of all places) and an entry from the
"country" of Africa (as if we in North America don't know any of the
individual nations on the continent).
The entwining of satire and comedy continues in the musical performances and
the competition's radio commentators. Maybe it's just me, but the funeral
dirges from some countries (most notably "Africa" and Scotland) are not
really "sad" at all, as they are a bit loud and a bit too upbeat. The
greatest offender is the American entry, who turns the competition into a
showcase for his Broadway ambitions, eschewing the premise of the
competition with the blessing of Lady Port-Huntley, who incidentally is his
former-current lover. The idiotic commentators obnoxiously chatter over a
loudspeaker even as the musicians are performing, delivering such priceless
wisdom as "Siam is known for its dignity, twins, and cats."
The themes of the film revolve around the separation between the rich and
the poor (one character enjoys a psychic connection with her tapeworm),
American excess, Canadian self-loathing, humanity's relentless desire for
the trivial and superficial over the meaningful and spiritual, the global
domination of American pop culture, how the mass media controls the world,
etc. However, none of these are really fleshed out in the film, but rather
touched on briefly then tossed away in favor of the next
idea.
Though the film is more style over substance, it is still thoroughly
enjoyable for anyone who loves the cinema in all its forms.
13 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :- funny, original, intriguing., 30 December 2004
Author:
(jason_dcruz@hotmail.com) from Toronto, Canada
Don't be scared away by people who warn that this movie is too
difficult or bizarre. This film will appeal to more than just the usual
cabal of obscurantists and nerdy cultists. The plot is quite
straightforward: a depression-era beer baroness commissions a contest
whose aim it is to find the saddest music in the world. As a result,
scores of zany musicians from around the world descend on frost-bitten
Winnipeg to win a $25000 prize. Hilarity ensues.
That's not to say the movie doesn't have its fair share of the absurd,
the bizarre, and the dark (it *is* a Canadian film, after all). Lines
are delivered with strange inflections, characters' motivations are
screwy, filmic styles are mixed. None of these, however, comes off as
pretentious or forced.
The film explores the interesting paradox that despite the reality and
ubiquity of real sadness, authentic expressions of sadness are
difficult and rare.
11 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :- Remarkable filmmaking, 12 May 2004
Author:
Lawrence (LGwriter49@aol.com) from Astoria, NY
Guy Maddin just gets better and better. In this, his latest film, he's
outdone himself. The fusion of content and style is so brilliant, clever,
and emotional, the film has to rank as one of the best of 2004 even with the
year not yet being half over.
Set in 1933, "the depths of the Great Depression", the location is Winnipeg,
Canada, home of Lady Port-Huntly (Isabella Rosselini), the astoundingly
wealthy beer baroness of Canada, who decides to hold a contest to select the
saddest music in the world--for business reasons, of course. Among the
entrants are her former lover, Chester Kent (Mark McKinney), his current
lover Narcissa (Maria de Medeiros), Chester's estranged brother Roderick
(Ross McMillan)--separated from Narcissa, and the men's father, Duncan
(Claude Dorge). Duncan represents Canada; Chester, America; and Roderick,
Serbia (of all places).
The prize is $25,000, a fortune in those days, so naturally there are
entrants from all over the world--among which are Mexico, Siam, and Africa.
The music is inspired, but eventually converges on the lilting popular
American tune The Song is You, for which there are diverse renditions in the
course of the film. The show-stopper is the version by Chester near the
end, a big band production that fuses influences, in typical American
fashion, from all over the world.
Familial tensions converge with unrequited love, and with the most peculiar
prostheses anyone has ever seen--either in real life or on film. Lady
Port-Huntly is a double amputee, and he whose reckless mistake resulted in
her unfortunate current condition fashions for her a pair of legs that must
be seen to be believed.
The entire film is shot using a blue-haze filter, with a faux stereopticon
effect that narrows the viewing screen to that resembling what one would see
from the early days of film, and with the faintest, subtlest and tiniest of
lags in action-speech synchronization that makes this uncannily resonate as
a work fusing a 30s setting, a pre-20s style, and a contemporary sensibility
that knows how to combine these elements in the first place. This is a
truly brilliant--I would even call it genius--approach to filmmaking that
noone else in the known world even remotely approaches. Maddin is one of
the contemporary masters of cinema and this is the proof.
As soon as this is available on DVD, I will buy it immediately. I suggest
you do the same.
16 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :- `The still, sad music of humanity.', 17 August 2004
Author:
John DeSando (jdesando@columbus.rr.com) from Columbus, Ohio
And I thought `Dogville' was stylized. Canadian writer/director Guy Maddin
("Dracula: Pages from a Virgin's Diary,' "Archangel') has created a film
like no other this year except possibly `Triplet's of Belleville.' `The
Saddest Music in the World' is a `musical' set in Winnipeg in 1933, where
Lady Port-Huntly (Isabella Rossellini) is holding a contest to award $25,000
to the saddest music performer. In `Depression Era dollars,' no
less.
Winnipeg has been declared by the London Times `the world capital of sorrow'
for the fourth year in a row. What happens in the film can be categorized
as surrealism of the sort that marries the Melies brothers in their
`Trip-to-the-Moon' wackiest to `The Twilight Zone' in Rod Serling's most
hilarious (and that's pretty unusual) moments. Shot in distressed mode with
8 mm blown up to be grainy and silent movieish, `Saddest' has blue-grays and
silvers and occasional bursts of washed-out color that give it an
otherworldly cast meant to satirize the old movies and create a new look
built on nostalgia and freedom from convention that some call
expressionism.
Some of the bizarre acts vying for the prize are Fyodor (David Fox), a
veteran of World War I representing Canada, who plays a deathlike version of
''The Red Maple Leaves'' on an upright piano he has turned over, and Indian
singers in Eskimo costumes, who dance to ''California Here I Come'' with
sitars and banjos commemorating a 19th-century kayaking accident. All the
time an iris lens blurs the edges of the film to recreate the ancient look
of film found in a vault after 50 years.
That Lady Port-Huntly needs artificial legs is not as bizarre as the back
story of how she came to need them, and that the new glass legs have local
beer coursing through them is just another creative and absurdist touch.
With a resemblance to the robot in `Metropolis,' she is an amalgam of
strange and prophetic moments in film and culture.
I know I'm not making much sense here-Trust me that this film is bizarre
enough to satisfy the geekiest cultist in our audience. For the rest of us,
just trying to appreciate all the signposts Maddin constructs to further his
absurd and funny vision is exhausting.
Wordsworth's thoughts apply because we at least hear `the still, sad music
of humanity.'
5 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- Visually interesting but the style wears thin, 12 June 2004
Author:
rosscinema (rosscinema@juno.com) from Oceanside,Ca.
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
If your a fan of the director than you have a head start than most viewers
but for others this exercise in style seems to wear out pretty fast despite
a unique approach to it's look and story. Story is suppose to take place
during the Depression in 1933 where in Winnipeg a legless beer baroness
named Lady Port-Huntley (Isabella Rossellini) has created a contest where
contestants from each country will try and win $25,000 by playing the
saddest music in the world. America is represented by Chester Kent (Mark
McKinney) who has his nymphomaniac girlfriend Narcissa (Maria de Medeiros)
accompany him. Chester's father Fyodor (David Fox) is representing Canada
and his brother Roderick (Ross McMillan) is representing
Serbia.
*****SPOILER ALERT*****
All of them have a history with Lady Huntley and years earlier they were
involved in a car crash where a drunken Fyodor amputated the wrong leg and
the end result was her having both legs cut off. Fyodor has been trying to
get her to forgive him and he has built prosthetic legs made out of glass
and filled with her own beer. The contest begins with two countries going at
one time with one being eliminated and the other going on to the next round.
During the contest Roderick discovers that his brothers girlfriend is
actually his wife that has disappeared after their son died but she has
amnesia and has forgotten it. The contest ends with brother against brother,
Serbia versus America!
This film is directed by the incredibly imaginative Guy Maddin who makes
films like you have never seen before and this is another visually
interesting effort. This is filmed mostly in black and white in 8mm and
video and has a look that seems truly inspired by F.W. Murnau and Fritz
Lang. Both "Metropolis" and "Sunrise" came to mind as I watched this and
this may be Maddin's homage to those filmmakers. Rossellini seems perfectly
cast in her role and her strongest moments come as she wears her glass legs
filled with beer but her performance seems overshadowed by the overall style
of the film. While I appreciate what Maddin was trying to do I do think that
the style grows quickly tiresome and the whole effort becomes a very tedious
viewing. This is interesting for the first 20 minutes or so but to sustain
the visualizations for an entire length of a film seems a tad much to ask of
viewers.
6 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- Experiments, madness, comedy, drama, musical and some more..., 6 May 2004
Author:
vdg from Vancouver,Canada
Experiments, madness, comedy, drama, musical and some more.
I was unaware of Guy Maddin movies until I saw this one, so from the start
to the end I was in awe about a director that came to me from nowhere and
managed to surprise me.
I am saying this as I have seen quite a few (1000's maybe) movies, and I am
very hard to be surprised by something.
Without any doubt the movie IS one of the most original ones I've seen in
years, and beside the strange techniques used (black/white grainy film,
alternating with color-grainy as well, theater-like sets, etc..) the
originality of the director is never the less amazing.
Of course quite a few people left the theater during the movie, but that's
understandable, as this is just for the die-hard fans of good/art films. If
you thought SALLO was a good movie, beside the cruelty on the screen, or if
you actually understood Satyricon, then this movie might appeal you,
otherwise don't waste your time on it.
I can't find a movie that can be related to this one, I just
cannot!!!
Great actors, great music and even a greater director: food for the
soul.
8/10
3 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :- How the world ignores sadness, 17 November 2004
Author:
David Grefrath from San Francisco, CA
--Minor Spoilers Ahead-- The Saddest Music in the World plays out more
like a short story than a film. It presents two opposed views of
looking at loss. One view, espoused by the Chester Kent character, is
oblivious of the past, and of the grief that is there. His songs are
raucous renderings. His brother, Roderick Kent (aka Gravillo the Great)
spends his entire time wallowing in the admittedly horrible past of the
death of his son and his wife's abandonment. Both brothers lie about
their nationality and are heralded falsely as representative of their
assumed countries. Both are, in a word, fakers. Both exaggerate their
characteristics they feel represent them, and all the other characters
in the film are forced to take sides. However, neither of the brothers
is realistic in their extremity, and thusly the script feels more like
a parable than a film. However, in a world focused on the consolidation
and amalgamation of culture, this film is all the more intriguing for
how immensely it avoids cultural integration in favor of assimilation.
Questions of assimilation to a country or ideals are seemingly posed
openly, in a manner that is not often found in the 'integrationist'
model of the western world. When asked of the film, Ishiguro said that
he intended the story he wrote to speak of the plight of displaced and
ravaged persons of the world needing to continually, more deeply,
horrify the world with their struggles. For instance, having Darfurians
create a sadder music than Rwandans. Arundhati Roy struck a similar
chord when she said, "Inhabitants standing in the remnants of their
flooded villages, protesting big dams, no longer make the news. The
public is tired of seeing that one." And after the first act, where the
film hints at the deeper issues, it abandons them to concentrate on the
dramatic arc of the two main characters, at times admirably. Indeed,
textually, it is admirable for its ambition. Few films in recent times
have asked these sorts of questions so brazenly about how one deals
with the past, and how grief is displayed (or portrayed) to a person or
an audience. Even there though, the film is more ponderous than moving,
more literary than cinematic and more intriguing than stunning.
Watch it at Amazon

Buy it at AmazonMore at IMDb Pro Discuss in Boards Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Saddest Music in the World (2003) More at IMDb Pro »
30 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :-

10/10, 2 August 2004
Author: desperateliving from Canada
What could only be titled as Cinema of the Ridiculous, Maddin's latest masterpiece, about a no-legged beer queen who hosts a Winnipeg-set competition to see which nation has the saddest music in the world, is filled to the gills with wacky ideas, but the reason it's a great film is because of the heartfelt feeling behind it. Maddin's genuine love for the silent cinema that he emulates (and attachment to the pathetic characters he creates) makes it possible for him to sustain a comic tone without it ever becoming mocking.
Maddin manages to balance the grotesque comic caricature of Mark McKinney as the shady mustached businessman who tries to win the competition, and Maria de Medeiros, who gets life advice from her tapeworm, with the pathetic goth character that's McKinney's brother, who's had to deal with the loss of a son, and the glamorous Isabella Rossellini, who's had to deal with the loss of her legs. (I wonder if the fact that Rossellini lost her legs in a car accident caused by her performing fellatio is a nod to the Myth of Murnau.) There's almost a subliminal melodrama taking place with the theme of loss and hilarious depression (during The Depression). It's an exciting movie visually, but unlike the best of the silents that Maddin loves, it's not poetic in that slow, beautiful way -- it's too fast-paced, kinetic, and rough to achieve any sort of traditional beauty -- but it is a feast. The few scenes of gaudy color -- reds, blues, and odd flesh tones -- are as grainy as the black and white. Maddin is truly one of the most imaginative of directors and he has a firm grasp of the medium. In fact, there is at least one scene of slow, beautiful poetry -- a purely silent moment, near the end, that comes alongside the bloody murder of Rossellini's screams. 10/10
24 out of 28 people found the following comment useful :-

Visually fascinating, but somewhat empty., 24 June 2004
Author: Admiral_Forrest from Charlottetown, Canada
I had always been told that director Guy Maddin did nothing conventionally, and so I approached The Saddest Music in the World with anticipation and hesitation. I am a great fan of Isabella Rossellini and Maria de Medeiros, both of whom do well in this picture. Maddin delivers a picture that is quite beautiful visually; all in black and white, and edited in such a way as to recall something resurrected from the 1930s. There are a few occasions when colour is allowed in, and those moments dazzle. One of the most striking images I have seen all year is Isabella Rossellini posing in Technicolour standing on glass legs filled with beer. It's something that has to be seen to be believed. However, once you get past the visuals, the film is rather empty and lacks heart. I do recommend it, though, because everyone should see something new and different (and for Isabella and Maria).
25 out of 31 people found the following comment useful :-

So funny I immediately bought another ticket, 1 May 2004
Author: Paul Klenk (paulklenk) from New York, NY
The credits rolled last night at 11:50 PM at the Sunshine on Houston Street in NYC.
Outside the theatre, I glanced up at the box office board: There was another viewing at 11:55 p.m. I impulsively bought another ticket and saw it again.
This is one of the funniest, most original and absurd movies I have ever seen. I feel like I can't believe I've actually seen it -- waking up dizzy at 2 PM today on a Saturday and pondering this movie.
All I remember is the wonderful music, the great one-liners, and those fanciful legs. Oh, for legs such as those!
Everyone must be forced to sit through this film as punishment for watching any television, ever.
Isabella Rossilini should be so proud of forging through the offers of banal roles and accepting roles such as this. It is not a surprise that the same actresss who allowed David Lynch to strip and bruise her in Blue Velvet would embrace such a role as Port-Huntley. If you're sad, and like beer, she's your woman!
The audience last night was howling with laughter and delight at the absurd and brilliant lines in this movie. There was so much to like about this spectacular musical.
But most of all, there were those intoxicating legs.
14 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :-

Terrific Satire-Comedy, 16 July 2004
Author: FlickeringLight from Boerne, TX
I saw Guy Maddin's film last weekend, not really knowing much about it other than it's premise, which was too absurd to pass up. A double amputee parapalegic beer baroness with glass legs filled with her own beer holding a contest during Prohibition to find the saddest music in the world? Where do people come up with this stuff?
The film is an interesting conglomeration of styles from films before and around the era in which it is set. The 8 mm footage with the stereopticon lens is reminiscent of the earliest films, and the distorted sets created in a studio are reminiscent of the German expressionist films. This is combined with a 30's musical and conversational style, including bits of "Technicolor" thrown in for good measure. I would have to see the film again, but I would like to go back and see it again to determine the link between the scenes which are suddenly shot in color as compared to the grainy black and white images that grace the rest of the film.
Despite the quizzical looks from the three fellow moviegoers who occupied the theatre, I found myself laughing out loud quite a few times at the film's caustic humor. The matches between the music from each country are like something out of a gangland film, with each side advancing toward each other menacingly during their performance. Some of the countries who perform in the competition reflect Maddin's satirical side, including a winning performance from Serbia (of all places) and an entry from the "country" of Africa (as if we in North America don't know any of the individual nations on the continent).
The entwining of satire and comedy continues in the musical performances and the competition's radio commentators. Maybe it's just me, but the funeral dirges from some countries (most notably "Africa" and Scotland) are not really "sad" at all, as they are a bit loud and a bit too upbeat. The greatest offender is the American entry, who turns the competition into a showcase for his Broadway ambitions, eschewing the premise of the competition with the blessing of Lady Port-Huntley, who incidentally is his former-current lover. The idiotic commentators obnoxiously chatter over a loudspeaker even as the musicians are performing, delivering such priceless wisdom as "Siam is known for its dignity, twins, and cats."
The themes of the film revolve around the separation between the rich and the poor (one character enjoys a psychic connection with her tapeworm), American excess, Canadian self-loathing, humanity's relentless desire for the trivial and superficial over the meaningful and spiritual, the global domination of American pop culture, how the mass media controls the world, etc. However, none of these are really fleshed out in the film, but rather touched on briefly then tossed away in favor of the next idea.
Though the film is more style over substance, it is still thoroughly enjoyable for anyone who loves the cinema in all its forms.
13 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :-

funny, original, intriguing., 30 December 2004
Author: (jason_dcruz@hotmail.com) from Toronto, Canada
Don't be scared away by people who warn that this movie is too difficult or bizarre. This film will appeal to more than just the usual cabal of obscurantists and nerdy cultists. The plot is quite straightforward: a depression-era beer baroness commissions a contest whose aim it is to find the saddest music in the world. As a result, scores of zany musicians from around the world descend on frost-bitten Winnipeg to win a $25000 prize. Hilarity ensues.
That's not to say the movie doesn't have its fair share of the absurd, the bizarre, and the dark (it *is* a Canadian film, after all). Lines are delivered with strange inflections, characters' motivations are screwy, filmic styles are mixed. None of these, however, comes off as pretentious or forced.
The film explores the interesting paradox that despite the reality and ubiquity of real sadness, authentic expressions of sadness are difficult and rare.
11 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :-

Remarkable filmmaking, 12 May 2004
Author: Lawrence (LGwriter49@aol.com) from Astoria, NY
Guy Maddin just gets better and better. In this, his latest film, he's outdone himself. The fusion of content and style is so brilliant, clever, and emotional, the film has to rank as one of the best of 2004 even with the year not yet being half over.
Set in 1933, "the depths of the Great Depression", the location is Winnipeg, Canada, home of Lady Port-Huntly (Isabella Rosselini), the astoundingly wealthy beer baroness of Canada, who decides to hold a contest to select the saddest music in the world--for business reasons, of course. Among the entrants are her former lover, Chester Kent (Mark McKinney), his current lover Narcissa (Maria de Medeiros), Chester's estranged brother Roderick (Ross McMillan)--separated from Narcissa, and the men's father, Duncan (Claude Dorge). Duncan represents Canada; Chester, America; and Roderick, Serbia (of all places).
The prize is $25,000, a fortune in those days, so naturally there are entrants from all over the world--among which are Mexico, Siam, and Africa. The music is inspired, but eventually converges on the lilting popular American tune The Song is You, for which there are diverse renditions in the course of the film. The show-stopper is the version by Chester near the end, a big band production that fuses influences, in typical American fashion, from all over the world.
Familial tensions converge with unrequited love, and with the most peculiar prostheses anyone has ever seen--either in real life or on film. Lady Port-Huntly is a double amputee, and he whose reckless mistake resulted in her unfortunate current condition fashions for her a pair of legs that must be seen to be believed.
The entire film is shot using a blue-haze filter, with a faux stereopticon effect that narrows the viewing screen to that resembling what one would see from the early days of film, and with the faintest, subtlest and tiniest of lags in action-speech synchronization that makes this uncannily resonate as a work fusing a 30s setting, a pre-20s style, and a contemporary sensibility that knows how to combine these elements in the first place. This is a truly brilliant--I would even call it genius--approach to filmmaking that noone else in the known world even remotely approaches. Maddin is one of the contemporary masters of cinema and this is the proof.
As soon as this is available on DVD, I will buy it immediately. I suggest you do the same.
16 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :-
`The still, sad music of humanity.', 17 August 2004
Author: John DeSando (jdesando@columbus.rr.com) from Columbus, Ohio
And I thought `Dogville' was stylized. Canadian writer/director Guy Maddin ("Dracula: Pages from a Virgin's Diary,' "Archangel') has created a film like no other this year except possibly `Triplet's of Belleville.' `The Saddest Music in the World' is a `musical' set in Winnipeg in 1933, where Lady Port-Huntly (Isabella Rossellini) is holding a contest to award $25,000 to the saddest music performer. In `Depression Era dollars,' no less.
Winnipeg has been declared by the London Times `the world capital of sorrow' for the fourth year in a row. What happens in the film can be categorized as surrealism of the sort that marries the Melies brothers in their `Trip-to-the-Moon' wackiest to `The Twilight Zone' in Rod Serling's most hilarious (and that's pretty unusual) moments. Shot in distressed mode with 8 mm blown up to be grainy and silent movieish, `Saddest' has blue-grays and silvers and occasional bursts of washed-out color that give it an otherworldly cast meant to satirize the old movies and create a new look built on nostalgia and freedom from convention that some call expressionism.
Some of the bizarre acts vying for the prize are Fyodor (David Fox), a veteran of World War I representing Canada, who plays a deathlike version of ''The Red Maple Leaves'' on an upright piano he has turned over, and Indian singers in Eskimo costumes, who dance to ''California Here I Come'' with sitars and banjos commemorating a 19th-century kayaking accident. All the time an iris lens blurs the edges of the film to recreate the ancient look of film found in a vault after 50 years.
That Lady Port-Huntly needs artificial legs is not as bizarre as the back story of how she came to need them, and that the new glass legs have local beer coursing through them is just another creative and absurdist touch. With a resemblance to the robot in `Metropolis,' she is an amalgam of strange and prophetic moments in film and culture. I know I'm not making much sense here-Trust me that this film is bizarre enough to satisfy the geekiest cultist in our audience. For the rest of us, just trying to appreciate all the signposts Maddin constructs to further his absurd and funny vision is exhausting. Wordsworth's thoughts apply because we at least hear `the still, sad music of humanity.'
5 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-

Visually interesting but the style wears thin, 12 June 2004
Author: rosscinema (rosscinema@juno.com) from Oceanside,Ca.
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
If your a fan of the director than you have a head start than most viewers but for others this exercise in style seems to wear out pretty fast despite a unique approach to it's look and story. Story is suppose to take place during the Depression in 1933 where in Winnipeg a legless beer baroness named Lady Port-Huntley (Isabella Rossellini) has created a contest where contestants from each country will try and win $25,000 by playing the saddest music in the world. America is represented by Chester Kent (Mark McKinney) who has his nymphomaniac girlfriend Narcissa (Maria de Medeiros) accompany him. Chester's father Fyodor (David Fox) is representing Canada and his brother Roderick (Ross McMillan) is representing Serbia.
*****SPOILER ALERT*****
All of them have a history with Lady Huntley and years earlier they were involved in a car crash where a drunken Fyodor amputated the wrong leg and the end result was her having both legs cut off. Fyodor has been trying to get her to forgive him and he has built prosthetic legs made out of glass and filled with her own beer. The contest begins with two countries going at one time with one being eliminated and the other going on to the next round. During the contest Roderick discovers that his brothers girlfriend is actually his wife that has disappeared after their son died but she has amnesia and has forgotten it. The contest ends with brother against brother, Serbia versus America!
This film is directed by the incredibly imaginative Guy Maddin who makes films like you have never seen before and this is another visually interesting effort. This is filmed mostly in black and white in 8mm and video and has a look that seems truly inspired by F.W. Murnau and Fritz Lang. Both "Metropolis" and "Sunrise" came to mind as I watched this and this may be Maddin's homage to those filmmakers. Rossellini seems perfectly cast in her role and her strongest moments come as she wears her glass legs filled with beer but her performance seems overshadowed by the overall style of the film. While I appreciate what Maddin was trying to do I do think that the style grows quickly tiresome and the whole effort becomes a very tedious viewing. This is interesting for the first 20 minutes or so but to sustain the visualizations for an entire length of a film seems a tad much to ask of viewers.
6 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-

Experiments, madness, comedy, drama, musical and some more..., 6 May 2004
Author: vdg from Vancouver,Canada
Experiments, madness, comedy, drama, musical and some more.
I was unaware of Guy Maddin movies until I saw this one, so from the start to the end I was in awe about a director that came to me from nowhere and managed to surprise me. I am saying this as I have seen quite a few (1000's maybe) movies, and I am very hard to be surprised by something.
Without any doubt the movie IS one of the most original ones I've seen in years, and beside the strange techniques used (black/white grainy film, alternating with color-grainy as well, theater-like sets, etc..) the originality of the director is never the less amazing.
Of course quite a few people left the theater during the movie, but that's understandable, as this is just for the die-hard fans of good/art films. If you thought SALLO was a good movie, beside the cruelty on the screen, or if you actually understood Satyricon, then this movie might appeal you, otherwise don't waste your time on it.
I can't find a movie that can be related to this one, I just cannot!!! Great actors, great music and even a greater director: food for the soul.
8/10
3 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :-
How the world ignores sadness, 17 November 2004
Author: David Grefrath from San Francisco, CA
--Minor Spoilers Ahead-- The Saddest Music in the World plays out more like a short story than a film. It presents two opposed views of looking at loss. One view, espoused by the Chester Kent character, is oblivious of the past, and of the grief that is there. His songs are raucous renderings. His brother, Roderick Kent (aka Gravillo the Great) spends his entire time wallowing in the admittedly horrible past of the death of his son and his wife's abandonment. Both brothers lie about their nationality and are heralded falsely as representative of their assumed countries. Both are, in a word, fakers. Both exaggerate their characteristics they feel represent them, and all the other characters in the film are forced to take sides. However, neither of the brothers is realistic in their extremity, and thusly the script feels more like a parable than a film. However, in a world focused on the consolidation and amalgamation of culture, this film is all the more intriguing for how immensely it avoids cultural integration in favor of assimilation. Questions of assimilation to a country or ideals are seemingly posed openly, in a manner that is not often found in the 'integrationist' model of the western world. When asked of the film, Ishiguro said that he intended the story he wrote to speak of the plight of displaced and ravaged persons of the world needing to continually, more deeply, horrify the world with their struggles. For instance, having Darfurians create a sadder music than Rwandans. Arundhati Roy struck a similar chord when she said, "Inhabitants standing in the remnants of their flooded villages, protesting big dams, no longer make the news. The public is tired of seeing that one." And after the first act, where the film hints at the deeper issues, it abandons them to concentrate on the dramatic arc of the two main characters, at times admirably. Indeed, textually, it is admirable for its ambition. Few films in recent times have asked these sorts of questions so brazenly about how one deals with the past, and how grief is displayed (or portrayed) to a person or an audience. Even there though, the film is more ponderous than moving, more literary than cinematic and more intriguing than stunning.
Add another comment
Related Links