|Page 1 of 48:||          |
|Index||477 reviews in total|
OK... this movie so far has been slated by critics and board-posters
alike (although playing devil's advocate you could suggest that critics
are often people who didn't make it for themselves as film-makers, and
board posters are often people who didn't make it for themselves as
critics) so I wanted to sit in Guy's corner with the magic sponge to
perhaps reach maybe a couple of the people who've decided not to see
the film based on how everybody seems to be looking down their
collective nose of approval at it.
The film's biggest flaw in earning wide support is how unexpectedly complex it is. This has been described many times as as making the film "inaccessible" to the viewer. The film's chronology is relatively non-linear and the characters are used as not only a means of storytelling but as a device for showing us the subtle (or not so subtle) hints of bias we give things as we commit them to memory, IE. Ray Liotta's character brandishing a gun saying the words "fear me" is portrayed as both tragically pathetic (from Statham's POV) or interrogating and bold (from Liotta's POV). This is but one example of Ritchie's far more mature approach he has taken to film-making with Revolver, we have a storyline which is pretty archetypal (the strong but silent gritty anti-hero gets released from jail with a score to settle but gets drawn inadvertently into a world of corruption... I mean it's paint by numbers film noir here guys, all the way down to the vague poetic choice of diction and the gritty voice-overs) but then Guy has taken this framework to make a number of extremely philosophical and complex points.
Take the scene where Jason Statham's character runs afoul of a car. This throwaway sequence could have been emitted from the film and made no difference to the story whatsoever... but Ritchie is making point about how such little chance happenings such as receiving a phone call can make the difference between life and death.
So the final act of the movie is pretty mind boggling, I'd be taking the p*ss if I said I didn't spend the last 20 minutes or so of the film turning to my date going "uh... wtf?"... but that is the shoddiest reason to disregard a piece of art. It is far too easy to dislike something because you find it hard to understand. And even easier to say "well nobody else seemed to understand it so it must be a real turd of a film!". In my humble opinion, Revolver is a stylish, complex and mature piece of modern art which should be greeted with the same manner we would give the work of the Saatchi Brothers. If we choose this opportunity to collectively say "Ah sh*t, I wanted a film about a load of bleeding' cockney gangsters in-nit loll... Guy Ritchie is a tit!" then the day will come when film-makers are allowed only to make that which is expected of them by shallow, crappy people. Just because Guy made a name for himself with funny, cheeky cockney romps, doesn't mean he can't be deep without being "pretentious". Funny people can be thoughtful too.
First of all, when people hear 'GUY RITCHIE', they immediately think of
SNATCH. Yes, Snatch was a good movie, but the problem is that everyone
associates Guy Ritchie to Snatch. They don't expect him to explore new
frontiers. This movie REVOLVER is different than snatch; it's much
darker and is very complex. The reason I gave a rating of 10 is because
I've had to watch Revolver 3 times to understand everything. So this
movie toys with your head. It's very cleverly written.
This movie is different than Snatch. It was done wonderfully, the cinematography is beautiful, and you can recognize Guy Ritchie's personal touch (style of directing) in it.
What won me over was the complexity of the protagonist and how we are left with more questions than answers.
I always enjoy seeing movies that make you think, and don't just
drip-feed the answers to their audience. "Revolver" is one of these
films, and although many reviewers have stated that it is difficult to
follow, with a bit of concentration and an open mind I got it. First
time. True, it doesn't compare to other mind-mucks like "The Usual
Suspects" or "Memento", but in its own right its an intelligent and
Another thing I really liked about this film is how damn beautiful it is. Every scene, every camera angle seems to have been thought about for ages. If you see it you'll know what I mean.
So, to conclude... watch it with an open mind and you may enjoy it. If not, well, no-one ever said "Revolver" is for everyone. And that's my 2 cents.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I watched to movie today and it just blew my mind away. It is a real masterpiece of art and I don't understand why most of the people think it's garbage. The main idea of the movie - take your ego away and then you will have true power! This was the main battle at the end of the movie and Guy Ritchie has shown that in a magnificent way. "The greatest enemy will hide in the last place you will ever look" - do you remember this from the movie? Because our true enemy is in us - it is our ego... That voice that always tells us that we are important, that gives us our pride, that tells us not to give, but only to take, that creates our aggression, that wants to be in control, that creates all the negative feelings and thoughts. GR expressed this idea in an astonishing way and has shown that the only way to gain true control is when you loose control and you just let go of your personal importance. A superb movie!
I will start by saying that this has undeservedly be panned by just
about everyone! The fact is it wasn't what anyone was expecting,
especially from Guy Ritchie. What everyone was expecting was cockney
geezers and good one liners "do ya like dags?" etc, but this is far
more mature than his previous works. I would agree that it is confusing
but all the facts are there for us we just have to see them and listen
harder, this film demands all your attention! Look past the cool and
dazzling look of the film, try to listen to the dialogue rather than
admire the performances and i think we will all get a more thorough
understanding of the whole film.
Yes this has its influences from modern classics( fight club, pulp fiction etc ) but it is in the whole original in both direction and pacing with a music score second to none. I feel that if everyone watched this film over and over they would understand it a lot more and maybe appreciate it for the fine piece of modern cinema that it is and i hope also that Ritchie continues in this vain as i far prefer this to his mockney "masterpieces".
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Having read the reviews for this film, I understandably started watching it with a great deal of doubt in my mind that it would actually be any good. However, this is one of the best films i have seen in a long time. The majority of reviews that i had read, said that the complicated plot made it too hard to follow. And whilst some parts do leave you confused, the ending ties up so many loose ends that you feel like kicking yourself because you've missed so much. It's not like "Lock, Stock..." or "Snatch", in the sense that it isn't that funny (in fact, it's pretty dark), and it is a lot more intelligent, in the way that you see parts of scenes from different viewpoints (and, in one of the best scenes of the film, Jason Statham spends five minutes in a lift having an argument with himself). The way in which it is similar to the two films i just mentioned, is that it is full of memorable characters, specifically Statham, who gives a fantastic performance as the lead, and Ray Liotta, who spends most of the film in Speedos, but gives a great performance none the less. If you've got time, and have time afterwards to think about the film, and even watch it again, you really start to see all the symbolism and hints that are laid out through the film. I think it's fantastic, and that Guy Ritchie is a director on top of his game.
I have just finished watching this film and I can honestly say that
this is a work of art. I was very surprised to see the overall rating
Not only does Guy bring together a b list(ish) movie cast and make them into such glorious characters, he has given us a movie with a fantastically diverse story line with much left to the imagination.
Far too many people are wanting movies with a plot that can be understood and handed to them on a plate...yet these are the films that get poor reviews because they are far too predictable.
This film is special. Get it, now!
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
First of all, don't go into Revolver expecting another Snatch or Lock
Stock, this is a different sort of gangster film.
I saw the gala the other night and this movie definitely split the audience. It's the kind of movie where half the audience will leave thinking WHAT was that? That was awful, and the other half will leave thinking WHAT was that? That was cool. Personally i like films that i don't understand, i.e.Mullholland Drive, and Usual Suspects, so i enjoyed Revolver.
It definitely wasn't perfect though. I saw the big twist coming a mile away, at least part of it, and though sometimes some loose ends left unexplained is good, Revolver leaves A LOT of questions unexplained for no reason it seemed. Also some scenes, like the animation, and the scene where Sorter goes on a killing spree(actually one of my favourites), although, awesome scenes to watch, seemed to just be there because they were awesome to watch, not because they fit in with the movie.
However there were many good things too. I thought the acting was superb from all the main actors, Jason stratham, Ray Liotta, Vincent Pastore, and even Andre Benjamin(who was a pleasant surprise). This movie definitely kept my interest, with one great, suspenseful, action packed, scene after another. When Ray Liotta was being held under the table wow....well you have to see it. The script was extremely well done, and the soundtrack, as with most Guy Ritchie films, was great.
Though a step below such movies as,Fight Club, Mullholland Drive, and Usual Suspects, it was still an awesome fast paced, psychological, action movie, with many twists and turns and tons of scenes you will remember long after the movie is over.
I have never known of a film to arouse such debate in my life. Believe me when i say that this film will eventually be remembered as an all-time classic. I was waiting in anticipation for this film as i had previously loved both Lock, Stock.... and Snatch, but after some of the negative reviews i thought i would be very disappointed. I absolutely loved this film and i can't wait to see it again. This film is totally different to both of the aforementioned Ritchie films, and also a lot better. I have my pick of favourite directors but none of them have pulled off a move as great as Guy Ritchie has just done with this movie. I believe he has taken movie-making to another level ( i know most people will be laughing at this comment guaging the reaction to this film, but i believe time will prove me right ). This movie is very confusing and carried on for much longer than the 2hr or so running time as i couldn't stop thinking about it or trying to piece things together. I have now got a pretty good take on everything that happens in this film ( some answers from endless hours of thinking, some answers from reading other people's take on the film )and now cannot wait until Sunday when i will see it again. I just hope people go to the cinema with an open mind and they will hopefully be rewarded as i and many others have been.
Neither the total disaster the UK critics claimed nor the misunderstood
masterpiece its few fanboys insist, Revolver is at the very least an
admirable attempt by Guy Ritchie to add a little substance to his
conman capers. But then, nothing is more despised than an ambitious
film that bites off more than it can chew, especially one using the
gangster/con-artist movie framework. As might be expected from Luc
Besson's name on the credits as producer, there's a definite element of
'Cinema de look' about it: set in a kind of realistic fantasy world
where America and Britain overlap, it looks great, has a couple of
superbly edited and conceived action sequences and oozes style, all of
which mark it up as a disposable entertainment. But Ritchie clearly
wants to do more than simply rehash his own movies for a fast buck, and
he's spent a lot of time thinking and reading about life, the universe
and everything. If anything its problem is that he's trying to throw in
too many influences (a bit of Machiavelli, a dash of Godard, a lot of
the Principles of Chess), motifs and techniques, littering the screen
with quotes: the film was originally intended to end with three minutes
of epigrams over photos of corpses of mob victims, and at times it
feels as if he never read a fortune cookie he didn't want to turn into
a movie. Rather than a commercial for Kabbalism, it's really more a
mixture of the overlapping principles of commerce, chess and confidence
trickery that for the most part pulls off the difficult trick of making
the theosophy accessible while hiding the film's central (somewhat
The last third is where most of the problems can be found as Jason Statham takes on the enemy (literally) within with lots of ambitious but not always entirely successful crosscutting within the frame to contrast people's exterior bravado with their inner fear and anger, but it's got a lot going for it all the same. Not worth starting a new religion over, but I'm surprised it didn't get a US distributor. Maybe they found Ray Liotta's intentionally fake tan just too damn scary?
|Page 1 of 48:||          |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Awards||External reviews||Parents Guide|
|Official site||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|