Flight from Death: The Quest for Immortality (TV Movie 2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
An Enlightening Experience
bval-311 March 2009
"The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death." – 1 Corinthians 15:26 The fight-or-flight response can be defined as "the biological response of animals to acute stress." However, these innate, mutually exclusive responses are simply inapplicable when applied to death.

While there are both antiquated methods to "fight" death (elixirs, elaborate religious ceremonies, and herbal anti-aging treatments) and new-age approaches in pharmaceuticals and genetics, death is impossible to defeat. Therefore, when it comes to considering the cessation of one's own life, fear and denial trigger the flight response.

Taking into account that humans are the only living beings knowledgeable enough to comprehend that they are simultaneously alive and doomed to die, people express anxiety about death. In addition, people fret over deserting their loved ones and spreading sadness. What's more, apprehension occurs in the anticipation of discovering if life after death indeed exists.

Cross-culturally, men and women ponder how the world will function without them, how their family and friends will cope with their death, and how those close to them will find comfort, security, and happiness through the grief. Think about it: in the event of your death, will the company you work for crumble? Will your spouse find love again? Will your kids' kids have kids? Speaking of adolescents, a long look into the face of an infant can truly reveal the power of life. Given that the human brain has a high level of plasticity during a child's formidable years (birth to three years of age), a baby represents fearlessness, innocence, and as close to a sense of immortality as one can imagine.

This is why Patrick Shen's and Greg Bennick's documentary Flight from Death: The Quest for Immortality begins with the faces of children. In its opening lines, Flight from Death asserts the fragility of human life: "To have emerged from nothing...to having a name, consciousness of self, deep inner feelings, and excruciating inner yearning for life and self-expression...and with all this, yet to die." From there, the film branches out in several directions, all of which center upon Ernest Becker's death anxiety ideology showcased in his Pulitzer Prize-winning book The Denial of Death. Various professors, authors, philosophers, and researchers (like Sheldon Solomon, Sam Keen, Dan Liechtry, Robert Jay Lifton, and Irvin Yalom) voice their scholarly views in support of and relation to Becker's claim that death anxiety motivates violence and aggression. The result is both thought-provoking and revealing.

Some of the very best material arrives in narrator Gabriel Byrne's (through Shen and Bennick's writing) words when he reads, "Human beings find themselves in quite the predicament. We have the mental capacity to ponder the infinite—seemingly capable of anything. Yet, housed in a heart-pumping, breath-gasping, decaying body, we are godly, yet creaturely." Likewise, Professor Sheldon Solomon exudes brilliance (through his Terror Management Theory and Mortality Salience Hypothesis) in nearly every word that leaves his lips.

At its weakest, Flight from Death loses its intimate connection when it goes global in its "Annihilation," "Looking for Evil," and "Violence Inherent" chapters. While these portions clarify the violence involved in the flight response, the segments that focus on a personal view of death anxiety are more profound than the attempts to paint the vast, cross-cultural picture.

In the long run, Flight from Death will cause you to dig deeper into the words of Ernest Becker, marinate in the thoughts of its writers, and seriously consider traveling afar to listen to the intensely engaging Professor Sheldon Solomon. It's full of beautiful images of grave sites, landscapes, and sunrises juxtaposed with brutal images of murder, violence, and outright shameful hatred. It's both eye-opening and daunting.

Just as certain as death itself, one thing's for sure: Flight from Death will never lose its relevance. At times, it's so utterly philosophical, didactic, and life-affirming that one can't help but to submit to its intrigue and run to recommend it to every fellow sentient being. After-all, "meaningful connections with other people make us feel fully alive and vibrant."
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The film expose the Grim Reaper for who he is
ironhorse_iv25 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Narrated by Gabriel Byrne in a creepy voice, Flight from Death, is deals with the uncovering of death anxiety or 'Teror Management Theory' as a possible root cause of many of our behaviors on a psychological, spiritual, and cultural level. While not a movie intended for entertainment like many of the rest on this list, it is well worth watching. The film follows the work of the late cultural anthropologist, Ernest Becker, and his Pulitzer Prize-winning book Denial of Death while exploring the ongoing research of a group of social psychologists that may forever change the way we look at ourselves and the world. Over the last twenty-five years, this team of researchers has conducted over 300 laboratory studies, which substantiate Becker's claim that death anxiety is a primary motivator of human behavior, specifically aggression and violence. The audience get to see them test the theory in various laboratory experiments which is nice. While Becker's theories are frighteningly hard to discount. I find his books utterly fascinating, but I am sure they will remain obscure simply because nobody wants to hear what he has to say as people are too scare about death. The film follows this stigmata. I surprise how little they mention Renee Descartes whom is known as the Modern Philosophy and should be mention since it deals with anxiety, no less. The film tend to focus more people in the field of Anthropology. The film has great interviews with a number of contemporary philosophers, psychiatrists and teachers such as Sam Keen, Robert Jay Lifton, Irvin Yalom, Merlyn Mowrey, Daniel Liechty and others, but still I would have love to know what Renee take on it. The film has a lot worth watching and you come out of it smarter and wiser, but depressing as well depending on your mood coming in the film. It has a number of News, and stock footage of people dying, and other death symbols that might be disturbing. There is a lot of footage of historical violence events like wars. This documentary goes much further than just dying and asks why do people go to war and why do people kill others as well. There are discussions about why the terror attacks were made on the World Trade Center. But this analysis goes beyond all the hyped-up media you have seen to date to give you a idea of how 'Terror Management Theory' works and cause them to act with hostility toward people who don't share their "illusion of immortality" (religion). It's not all bad, yes there is tons of graveyards shots, but the film tries it's best to put uplifting footage in the film. Flight from Death doesn't treat death in a slow-moving, somber or sullen tone. Through quick editing, some fast-motion cinematography and lively, thought-provoking interviews with funny talking smart hippies doctors, the film treats death as a meaningful celebration of life. Still the film leaves some open questions, that I have to add my two sense in. I have to disagree with Becker and the film about the fear of death, as far as it is presented here. We can articulate what we fear about death, and it seems painfully clear to me what the issue is. It seems, according to everything I have ever read and experienced on the subject, that we fear death because we fear annihilation, nothingness, oblivion. Perhaps less conscious animals fear death on an instinctual level, as some appears to be saying as a base level survival instinct but this really does not seem to be the case for humans. It states out that humans are the only creature that are aware of our own demise in the future while animals can't not understand death until it's happens for that it is why humans are the only creature to seek religion. How can we be sure that chimps, elephants and dolphins don't have death awareness too? I mean they can grieve for dead ones, for a start. It's seem religious in a way. Why does wolves howl at the moon? Why does a rooster welcome the sun? Why does bees have this extremely complex social order even without conscience? That doesn't seem instinctual. What the film does well, is try to explain the purpose or meaning of life. While, the purpose of life is only to live (exist). Maintaining itself through reproduction and the like is a process of life, not necessarily its purpose. Life is just a state. Humanity are lucky that through its various processes, it's now something that can be experienced and appreciated. If you become immortal you may just get bored with life. After you conquer death you conquer fear and thus start to become inhuman. Fear is the final frontier that holds everything apart. It is like resistance in an electric circuits, as electrical engineers we are constantly trying to rid ourselves of resistance, yet without it we fail to have any voltage. The film also doesn't tackle the question of what happens after death. While there is no evidence for an infinite, transcendent consciousness. I believe the film should have focus the work of Arthur Schopenhauer. While largely borrowed his own approach to death from Buddhism. He maintained that virtually everything--including humans--is a projection of the Will (See World as Will and Representation). His reasoning for not fearing death was that the will will continue on after we die, and our death is just a reconfiguration of the will. In that respect, we are the will and the will does not die. It would be awesome to see that in this film. What makes this film so important is that it puts these difficult, normally avoided questions squarely on the table for discussion, letting us find our own answers. As you see, it did. So check it out and seek your own answers.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
super insightful movie!
clarice990019 July 2005
i saw this movie at the silver lake film festival and wasn't quite sure what to expect going into it but the film was thought provoking and superbly entertaining. it actually ended up winning the best documentary award at the festival and i couldn't agree more with that. i have not been able to stop thinking about this movie and have since read Denial of Death the book on which the film is based. it's an important film that everyone should see. the ideas and the way they are packaged both in the book and the film really have a way of changing the way you think and look at the world. not many films have that kind of power.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
an excellent documentary
leboeuf_guy9 October 2005
Flight from death is a "must see" documentary. I saw it three times since i've received the DVD last week and each time i discover new aspects. Images are beautiful and the commentary (narrated by Gabriel Byrne) are just outstanding. Before seeing it, i was a little bit anxious to see how they can translate in a documentary the rather complex thought of Ernest Becker. As a reader of Becker's books for many years i can tell that Patrick Sean and Greg Bennick had done a really good job. Each important parts of Becker's understanding of the impact of death anxiety on human behavior are explored and very well explained. I understand now why this documentary won seven prizes. Please do not hesitate to buy this DVD you won't regret it!
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It really does Ernest Becker justice!
dopefishie11 December 2022
I'm happy to say it really does Ernest Becker justice!

It covers the major concepts in his book. They cover how Becker's concepts affect society, politics, and the individual.

They interview pertinent thinkers and those who actually knew Ernest Becker when he was alive. Some highlights are interviews with Sam Keen, Irvin Yalom, and Robert Jay Lifton. But I think it was Sheldon Solomon who really stole the show... that man has a way with words! Lol.

Gabriel Byrne does an excellent job narrating. My only complaint would be that I wanted more! I could listen to these great thinkers go on and on... maybe turn this into a docuseries or something.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
really vulgar and yields precious little in the way of content
marymorrissey11 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
ponderous narration that at least 70 percent of the time is saying nothing a 7 year old doesn't know: "we've reached the moon, but people still die!" is the sole point of the first 10 minutes of blabbering voice-over during which time we see probably 150 archival shots, the great benneton panorama of life dontchaknow. oh and being made post koyannisquatsi those of you who believe clichéd shots of traffic sped up and individuals in slow motion looking lugubrious (not shot in slow motion, cheaply slowed down in final cut or whatever) are really profound will be very pleased. If any or all of this had been at least done well it wouldn't be quite so bad on the most superficial aesthetic level, but every element of this film is clunky from the less than impeccable sound on the interviewees to the embarrassing attempts to create interesting backgrounds for the speakers, the framing of any shots they did and the terrible rhythms throughout supported/undermined by often questionable music choices, leaving aside any consideration of the meandering point of the damned thing.

subsequently more than any consistent notion of immortality, let alone the literal one, we pursue these sort of riffs that follow a shifting pick and choose framing of the idea, "immortality", and it's painfully transparent that this construction is nothing but an ad hoc platform for politically correctish pontificating. of the sort you don't even have to hear. you can tell how these talking heads think, most of them, simply looking at their clothing: tie dyed t shirts are the order of the day. "well if you defeat someone it's like you're immortal, kinda, the other person turns in a way out to be mortal, ya know what I mean, man?" *passes joint* then we cut to 3 minutes of tons of violent footage and corny footage and ironic footage, poignant footage of any and everything cut dismally together. don't get me wrong, I agree with the things all the people are saying in the film, it's just... this is no documentary it's not informative aside from a few details of history that some of the people cite to support their opinions. this is just a bull session of liberal guys in their 50s. Did enjoy seeing dapper Robert J. Lifton, this ascot wearing much older guy, author of "The Nazi Doctors" which I happen to have read. Another interesting author the other reviews mention whose name I forget sounds worth investigating. MAYBE the film spun out of his ideas in part or entirely but that's not clear in the least. He's introduced, his importance is acknowledged then we get back to hairy freak brothers who teach at various universities talking to the audience like undergraduates. I mean obviously it's not a fictional film, so it has to be a doc, the question is more: is it a film? this would have been just as well an article that one could have finished reading in 20 minutes at the doctors office and all the surfeit of time taken to consume this material is very sort of greedy of the makers of this movie.

I rented this cause it sounded possibly interesting and won all these prizes. I can't believe it now that must have been a bad year for doc features.

Disclosure: I turned if off after about an hour.
7 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I'm an atheist and got absolutely nothing out of this film...
Sean_Biggins23 September 2022
I tend to agree more with the reviewer who gave it 2 out of 10, but maybe I'm 'siding' with him just because I'm afraid of death! ;-) He also mentioned that it was a "platform for politically correctish pontificating" and I really agree with that in that they talk about how we fight and have wars to reaffirm that our race/clan etc. Are the 'correct' ones and that the enemy is just some kind of evil heathen animal that believes in a different type of God than us so deserves to die, and in this politically correct, white guilt-ridden film, 'WE', means us evil 'white men' and our American belief system and our war machines, man! Yeah this is just annoying and difficult to even listen to because it's mainly just BS. Why didn't they show radical Islamist's threatening to cut off people's heads if he didn't convert to Islam, because THAT would have been a far better example of religious intolerance -- but since the film was made by the white activist, guilt-ridden types, then of course they had to keep the focus on the 'man'.

I do believe that the radical Islamist's DO fight for religious reasons and the payoff they believe they're going to get in a paradise after death and 72 virgins and endless wine etc., but I don't believe that most white people go to war for the same reasons at all. I've seen a lot of soldiers interviewed who fought in Iraq and they're really good people who simply wanted to kill the Taliban who were oppressing the public which to me seems perfectly righteous and is not linked to anything selfish or seeking divinity.

As for war and this supposed deep link to one's own religion and immortality etc., I just think this is all a big load of garbage. When you're talking about basic fights that break out (they show footage of street fights), on that level, people are just like Chimpanzees. I saw Jane Goodall in an interview discussing the Gombe Chimpanzee War, and she was mortified at the brutality the chimps inflicted, and before this happened, she had believed that chimps were 'better' than people, but they're clearly not, and I think chimps are a perfect example of what people are like. We really are not very far removed from them and to think otherwise is very arrogant.

Anyhow, I can't say I'm very impressed with the film and/or most of the professors interviewed and they didn't bring anything new to the table for me. I don't believe in any kind of life after death and think our lives end when we die just as the chimps lives end.

Below is some info from the chimp war if you're interested:

Jane Goodall, a famous primatologist, is well known for her unprecedented findings of native chimpanzee populations in her studies. The outbreak of the war came as a disturbing shock to Goodall, who had previously considered chimpanzees to be, although similar to human beings, "rather 'nicer'". Coupled with her 1975 observation of cannibalistic infanticide by a high-ranking female in the community, the Gombe war revealed the "dark side" of chimpanzee behavior. In her 1990 memoir Through a Window: My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe, she wrote:

For several years I struggled to come to terms with this new knowledge. Often when I woke in the night, horrific pictures sprang unbidden to my mind-Satan (one of the apes... she had probably named him Satan even before this for a good reason), cupping his hand below Sniff's chin to drink the blood that welled from a great wound on his face; old Rodolf, usually so benign, standing upright to hurl a four-pound rock at Godi's prostrate body; Jomeo tearing a strip of skin from Dé's thigh; Figan, charging and hitting, again and again, the stricken, quivering body of Goliath, one of his childhood heroes. ...
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed