IMDb >
"Charles II: The Power & the Passion" (2003)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditsepisode listepisodes castepisode ratings... by rating... by votestv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsrecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips"Charles II: The Power & the Passion" (2003) More at IMDbPro »TV mini-series
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
21 March 2004 (USA) morePlot:
The chronicle of Charles II's time on the throne, his 10 year exile from Oliver Cromwell's England, and his triumphant return. full summaryPlot Keywords:
Awards:
Nominated for Primetime Emmy. Another 4 wins & 9 nominations moreNewsDesk:
(9 articles)
Paul Sloan's King Of Vampires gets optioned by Vallelonga Productions (From QuietEarth. 25 August 2009, 9:23 AM, PDT)
New Podcast: Oscar Night Memories and "Best Consecutive Oscar Runs"
(From FilmExperience. 28 February 2009, 10:00 AM, PST)
User Comments:
Worth a watch more (16 total)Cast
(Series Cast overview, first billed only)| Martin Turner | ... | Charles I | |
| Rufus Sewell | ... | King Charles II | |
| Ian McDiarmid | ... | Sir Edward Hyde | |
| Rupert Graves | ... | George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham | |
| Michael Pober | ... | Tutor | |
| Ryan Nelson | ... | Young Monmouth | |
| Diana Rigg | ... | Queen Henrietta Maria | |
| Sean Biggerstaff | ... | Henry, Duke of Gloucester | |
| Helen McCrory | ... | Barbara Villiers, Countess of Castlemaine | |
| Richard Rowlands | ... | Sir Roger Palmer | |
| Charlie Creed-Miles | ... | James, Duke of York | |
| Peter Wight | ... | Ormonde | |
| Garry Cooper | ... | General Monck | |
| Martin Freeman | ... | Lord Shaftesbury | |
| Joel Sugerman | ... | Antwerp Servant |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
Charles II (UK) (short title)Charles II: The Power and the Passion (UK) (DVD title)
The Last King (USA)
The Last King: The Power and the Passion of Charles II (USA) (DVD title)
more
Runtime:
235 min | USA:188 minCountry:
UKColor:
ColorAspect Ratio:
1.78 : 1 moreSound Mix:
StereoCertification:
Netherlands:12 | Australia:MA | Finland:K-15 | Portugal:M/12 (DVD rating) | Singapore:M18 | UK:15Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Shirley Henderson's elaborate hairstyle for Catherine's arrival initially took two hours to create. moreQuotes:
King Charles II: It's all been for nothing, Nell. The cause that gave my life meaning, will die with me. I fought to restore everything that was lost when my father was murdered but James will destroy it all. I know that, I've always known that.Nell Gwynn: Then why did you fight so hard for him?
King Charles II: Not for him, for the principle. For the rights of Kings. Parliament will have its victory in the end.
Nell Gwynn: You know what I think about politics; it's all a lot of foolish men scheming to ruin each other for no reason anyone can remember a few years later. If it was up to me, I'd give the throne to Monmouth. Because, in my opinion, a King should always be handsome.
[...]
more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (16 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for "Charles II: The Power & the Passion" (2003)| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| Shirley Henderson's most annoying role | LCShackley |
| The Last King | just_nikki |
| Barbara Palmer | clover314 |
| DVD in Aus | la_montespan |
| Best Biography | superstu86 |
| Gory content? | Youngman_Grand |
Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Elizabeth: The Golden Age | Edward II | The Libertine | "The Black Adder" | Titanic |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb TV section | IMDb Drama section |
| IMDb UK section | Add this title to MyMovies |
You may add a new episode for this TV series by clicking the 'add episode' button

First, those of you who watched this as a three-hour movie with 30 commercial breaks must have seen a royally butchered cut as the R2 DVD is four hour-long episodes.
Second, those who claim that the BBC are not as good as they used to be are, perhaps, not quite fair, but not totally wrong either. I imagine they are comparing Charles II to Elizabeth R; I, Claudius; or The Six Wives of Henry VIII, and yes, it's not as good as they were. But then, neither were the other series the BBC were making at that time.
But if such comparisons are not entirely fair, they are also inevitable. Elizabeth, Six Wives and Claudius were televised plays. They worked due to the interaction of great scripts and great acting. The costumes were icing on the cake; the direction and camera work were capable but never drew attention to themselves. These teleplays continued a dramatic tradition traceable back to Shakespeare. They were *plays*.
Charles II, on the other hand, as well as other historical dramas done by the BBC these days, has abandoned its dramatic lineage for cinematic aspirations, especially as technology becomes more affordable. I don't consider this a bad thing, though I do think it failed, just as many teleplays of the golden era failed in their attempts. There's nothing wrong with bringing direction, camerawork, production design, etc. to the fore. Unfortunately, the scripts suffer, at least in this case. The viewer is innundated with flashy techniques like handheld cameras which achieve nothing other than making the show look modern, or a seven-minute long single take near the end of the final episode which contained about three minutes of dialogue that actually advanced the plot or developed the character in meaningful ways.
Is it worth watching? Yes. But don't compare it the greatest costume dramas ever made. Take it for what is, and it's a fine drama.