| Jacqueline Reres | ... | Lynn Blodgett (as Jacky Reres) | |
| Mark Lassise | ... | Shivers the Clown | |
| Rick Ganz | ... | Tuck Reed | |
| rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
| Darla Albornoz | ... | Mediator | |
| John Patrick Barry | ... | Officer Patrick | |
| Steve Carson | ... | Cop with children | |
| Jed Duvall | ... | Happy Clown | |
| Judith Furlow | ... | Gale | |
| Steven Gleich | ... | Marty | |
| Rich Henn | ... | Cop 3 | |
| Paul C. Kangas | ... | Sean | |
| Frank Lama | ... | Detective Peters | |
| Patrick T. McGowan | ... | Mr. Parrish | |
| Lauren Pellegrino | ... | Amanda | |
| Christopher Lee Philips | ... | Osbourne | |
| Jack Porter | ... | Nicholas | |
| Carl Randolph | ... | Bert | |
| Andrew Schneider | ... | Phillip (as Andrew C. Schneider) | |
| Bill Stull | ... | Veteran Police Officer | |
| Ted Taylor | ... | Heston | |
| Lisa Willis Brush | ... | Julie | |
Directed by | |||
| Kevin Kangas | |||
Writing credits(in alphabetical order) | ||
| Kevin Kangas | ||
Produced by | |||
| Joel Baker | .... | executive producer | |
| Michelle Baker | .... | executive producer | |
| Rick Ganz | .... | producer | |
| Kevin Kangas | .... | producer | |
| Jeff Kipers | .... | executive producer | |
Original Music by | |||
| Chad Seiter | |||
Cinematography by | |||
| David Mun | |||
Film Editing by | |||
| Harvey Glatman | |||
Casting by | |||
| Jane Toppan | |||
Special Effects by | |||
| Doug Ulrich | .... | special effects makeup | |
Visual Effects by | |||
| Paul C. Kangas | .... | visual effects | |
Stunts | |||
| Steve Carson | .... | additional stunts | |
Camera and Electrical Department | |||
| Steve Carson | .... | assistant camera | |
Other crew | |||
| Scott Ennis | .... | producer consultant | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gacy | Bluebeard | S.I.C.K. Serial Insane Clown Killer | Dead Silence | The Minus Man |
|
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Horror section | IMDb USA section |
Hey,
I've seen a lot of posts where you defend the hell out of this flick, but I've got to tell you, you can't blame shoddy writing and extremely poor directing on a lack of budget. I was on board to see a movie that looked like crap but had all the basic elements OK, because that's what a low-low budget film normally has. But this "film" is a piece of crap.
Here's the complaints:
ON WRITING: You claim to have a definitive love of horror films, specifically Halloween and Alien, yet you completely ignore the structure of these scripts. Each great horror film has its foundation in a strong psychological subtext (I.E. repression and return of the repressed, male/female archetypes and the overthrow of such, infiltration of boundaries, etc.). Your film has people talking in circles with crap lines like "Have you ever been spanked by a clown?". If childhood trauma were at the heart of the film, why not draw us more into it? Instead, you do what every other hack in this business does: you write B.S. dialogue that makes no sense because you don't have the first clue as to who your characters are.
In addition, the reason that this film is not scary is because you explain EVERYTHING. What's scarier: a psycho-killer who walks around in a mask killing for no reason and with no remorse or a psycho-killer who sits around saying, " Get BETTER, Get BETTER."? This is why Carpenter, Craven and Scott are geniuses, and well, you have this as your crowning achievement.
ON DIRECTING: Have you ever heard of the 180 degree line? You jump all over the place with mismatched reverse shots, and ever-changing screen direction, leaving us as an audience unable to settle. And since you've asked repeatedly why the editing is bad, I have one question: Do either you or your editor know what a beat is? There are no dramatic moments in this film because you are constantly cutting away from them. What could have been a nice introductory scene between your two protagonists becomes a confusing mess because you cut the living daylights out of it.
This "film" has no sense of mood or character whatsoever. I think the character that actually went deepest was Shivers, and that should say something about where your focus was. In your extremely self-important and self-indulgent "making of" segment, I found your attitude toward your actors appalling. First of all, DO NOT DIRECT A RESULT! This is the first rule of working with actors, taught in the most basic of classes. When you stood there and said to Mark something like, "I want to see a mixture of agitated and hungry" or something to that effect, my heart broke for all of the people who had to work under such conditions. And at one point you were yelling at people, and saying to the actors, "I just want to finish this f--- ing scene and go home." What does that say to them about your level of support, when they're the ones bleeding on film for you. Shame on you, my friend, shame on you. And on a sidenote: if the makers of the camera that you shot with won't let you release their name or logo in your "making of", doesn't that say something about the film?
Rent the movie "Overnight". You might learn a thing or two about the path you are traveling. That is, if you ever do get a shot, which I highly doubt. You should go into another field, or at least take some classes on writing, directing and working with actors.