6.3/10
143,986
897 user 174 critic

King Arthur (2004)

PG-13 | | Action, Adventure, Drama | 7 July 2004 (USA)
A demystified take on the tale of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table.

Director:

Writer:

Reviews
Popularity
1,184 ( 119)

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

ON DISC
4 wins & 8 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Pat Kinevane ...
Ivano Marescotti ...
...
Edit

Storyline

Based on a more realistic portrayal of "Arthur" than has ever been presented onscreen. The film will focus on the history and politics of the period during which Arthur ruled -- when the Roman empire collapsed and skirmishes over power broke out in outlying countries -- as opposed to the mystical elements of the tale on which past Arthur films have focused. Written by Scott Summerton

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

The Untold True Story That Inspired The Legend See more »


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for intense battle sequences, a scene of sensuality and some language | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

| |

Release Date:

7 July 2004 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

King Arthur: Director's Cut  »

Box Office

Budget:

$120,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$15,193,907 (USA) (11 July 2004)

Gross:

$51,882,244 (USA) (21 December 2004)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (director's cut)

Sound Mix:

| | | (5.1) (L-R)

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Ivano Marescotti didn't speak any English when he was cast as Bishop Germanius, and had to learn the language simultaneously as he rehearsed the role. See more »

Goofs

During the final battle, these is no one to open the gate in Hadrian's Wall, it just seems to open and close on its own. However, the extended edition shows that at least Jols and Ganis stayed behind, possibly to work the gate mechanism. See more »

Quotes

[first lines]
Lancelot: [voiceover] By 300 AD, the Roman Empire extended from Arabia to Britain. But they wanted more. More land. More peoples loyal and subservient to Rome. But no people so important as the powerful Sarmatians to the east. Thousands died on that field. And when the smoke cleared on the fourth day, the only Sarmatian soldiers left alive were members of the decimated but legendary cavalry. The Romans, impressed by their bravery and horsemanship, spared their lives. In exchange, these ...
[...]
See more »

Crazy Credits

There are no opening credits, not even the production company and studio bumpers, only the title. See more »

Connections

Referenced in Hollywood's Top Ten: Battle of the Warriors (2011) See more »

Soundtracks

Amergin's Invocation
Composed by Lisa Gerrard & Patrick Cassidy
Courtesy of Sony/ATV Music Publishing Australia
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Monty Python was more historically accurate
11 August 2004 | by (UK) – See all my reviews

They could also act better and write a decent script. Nothing in this film makes sense:

  • the "britons" who live in Scotland and dress like their predecessors of 4
centuries

  • Pretty much everything about the armour and weapons (far too much to
mention in under 1000 words).

  • In fact everything that tries to pass for history in this
mess

  • The ability of everyone to understand 3 or more languages


  • Britons fighting Saxons in the Borders under a Roman
flag

  • Clive Owen thinking he can act


  • Anyone thinking that script wouldn't make people laugh till it
hurts

  • Roman conscription lasting 15 years and ending with a return to
Rome

  • Low infant mortality rate and model-like mother of 11 healthy
brats(particularly made me laugh)

  • Leaving a well defended fort to fight superior forces in the
open

  • Magical Mystery Fort Doors that close their many-tonned-selves
automatically

  • The phrase "Historians agree"


  • The world's lightest heavy cavalry and most accurate
archers

  • 100s of arrows from 8 bows


  • The cruddy ripoff of Aleksandr Nevsky


  • The many many cruddy ripoffs of Braveheart (a film which despite being
historically laughable is excellent entertainment unlike this one)

And on and on and on and on.....

It's not just that it's poor history it's bad storytelling and makes the film painful to watch even if the script did engender any interest from the audience or the numerous dreadful performances didn't remove any prospect of caring for or about the characters.

1/10 and that's only because of the bit-part guy that put on a funny Somerset accent at one point. He, at least, clearly knew a little bit about the legends and history this farce pretends to represent.

As a final thought - I don't know why Miss Knightley is drawn to bloody awful adaptations of English legends but I wish she'd stop it.


100 of 169 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page