MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 136 this week

Wolves of Wall Street (2002)

2.1
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 2.1/10 from 449 users  
Reviews: 22 user | 9 critic

Jeff Allen just got a new job in one of Manhattan's wealthiest brokerage firms, Wolfe Brothers. Here young, good-looking stockbrokers make a lot of money by being particularly cutthroat. ... See full summary »

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 358 titles created 15 Dec 2011
 
a list of 18 titles created 07 Nov 2011
 
a list of 3571 titles created 8 months ago
 
a list of 474 titles created 9 months ago
 
a list of 3286 titles created 08 Apr 2012
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Wolves of Wall Street (2002)

Wolves of Wall Street (2002) on IMDb 2.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Wolves of Wall Street.

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Tyler
...
Landlady
...
Jeff Allen
Angela Pietropinto ...
Human Resources #1 (as Angela M. Pietropinto)
...
Human Resources #2
...
Human Resources #3
...
...
Vince
...
Meeks (as Jason Shane Scott)
...
Barnes (as John Paul LaVoisier)
...
Kennison
...
Annabella Morris
...
Davis
...
Woman In Red (as Natalie Jovan)
Amber Gross ...
Party Girl #1
Edit

Storyline

Jeff Allen just got a new job in one of Manhattan's wealthiest brokerage firms, Wolfe Brothers. Here young, good-looking stockbrokers make a lot of money by being particularly cutthroat. Jeff finds out that the real secret to their success is an animal instinct that is turning him into a werewolf, but it may be too late for him to get out. Written by Trey Evans

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Some Brokers Are A Different Kind Of Animal


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for some sensuality and language

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

31 December 2002 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Farkasok között  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

References The Shield (2002) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Could've been alot better! Almost there, but not quite!
23 February 2004 | by (New York City) – See all my reviews

I don't know whether the director wanted to make this movie a horror movie or a psychological horror movie. I guess this director couldn't make up his mind and the movie ended up full of promise but never delivers!

All the actors give very good performances. Eric Roberts is a very good actor who seems to get stuck doing mediocre movies. He plays a small part in this film but he gives a very good performance with what he's given with. Heck! Eric Roberts always gives a good performance whatever movie he's in! The rest of the actors are very attractive young men or women. There is quite a bit of suggested homoeroticism in this movie, but nothing too overt.

A young man comes to Wall Street in his quest to become a stockbroker. He ends up working for this strange firm that has unique ideas of what it is to be a good employee to this company. I wish they would've shown more of the material rewards of being a stockbroker, it would make the audience understand why this young man wanted to be part of this strange company.

The ending of this film is unbelieveable! Not a good unbelieveable, but a bad unbelieveable! Okay, it's a good idea to arm oneself with a silver dagger to go up against werewolves, not just a silver pen! That's all I can tell you about the ending, you'll have to see it for yourself if you are curious enough to rent this two hour time waster.

The director should have shown some sort of werewolf special effects. I don't know why he didn't. Then if the director is not going to show any special effects, then he should've turn this film into a psychological horror film of a young man getting sucked into the evil lifestyle of this stockbroker firm.

This film just didn't work. This film showed wonderful shots of downtown Manhattan at night and Wall Street during the day and showed great actors, but the story sucked big time! This movie is an interesting failure.

Watch it if you're interested in looking at hunky guys in suits or shirtless!

I give this movie a D+!


2 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Leaves you growling for more SKarleck
Perfection mrnibbles
worked on this udscagz
Who sings that song? k_ray44
What were the producers thinking? sentient-5
Left ME changing the channel! knyne
Discuss Wolves of Wall Street (2002) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?