MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 38,839 this week

London After Midnight (2002)

TV Movie  -   -  Drama | Horror  -  1 November 2002 (USA)
6.3
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.3/10 from 172 users  
Reviews: 10 user | 3 critic

A reconstruction, made from still photographs, of the lost 1927 Tod Browning film London After Midnight (1927) starring Lon Chaney .

Director:

Writers:

(story), , 1 more credit »
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 397 titles
created 25 Jun 2011
 
a list of 7096 titles
created 03 Jan 2012
 
a list of 50 titles
created 16 May 2012
 
a list of 3564 titles
created 13 Sep 2012
 
list image
a list of 770 titles
created 5 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: London After Midnight (TV Movie 2002)

London After Midnight (TV Movie 2002) on IMDb 6.3/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of London After Midnight.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
(archive footage)
...
(archive footage)
Andy MacLennan ...
(archive footage)
Polly Moran ...
(archive footage)
Conrad Nagel ...
(archive footage)
...
Himself - Host
Edna Tichenor ...
(archive footage)
Henry B. Walthall ...
(archive footage)
Edit

Storyline

A reconstruction, made from still photographs, of the lost 1927 Tod Browning film London After Midnight (1927) starring Lon Chaney .

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

remake

Genres:

Drama | Horror

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

1 November 2002 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Featured in Top 10 Lost Horror Films (2010) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A Beautiful Still Restoration
31 July 2003 | by (Houston, Texas) – See all my reviews

When I learned that "London after Midnight" was going to be on, I thought it was the actual film, and was very eager to see it. At first I was slightly disappointed when I saw pictures instead of action. However, my disappointment was quickly gone. In essence, the restoration was a "silent film" but had no motion. The "still acting" was masterful, and it was so easy to understand the characters. The script and sets were great, the timing between the "shots" was good, particularly when different angles of a subject were changed rapidly. I am a Lon Chaney fan, and his close-ups are masterpieces. He truly stole the show, although it had a good cast. Chaney was unrecognizeable in his unsettling vampire makeup, and it helped make his performance as the vampire more potent. Coupled with his performance as the highly intelligent, take-charge Inspector Burke, he's truly a winner.

I am curious to see the actual film, but I am greatly impressed with the restoration TCM did. They tried to get the restoration as much like the film as possible, and because of that, it is a godsend.


2 of 5 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss London After Midnight (2002) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page