High Roller: The Stu Ungar Story
(2003)
|
|
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
High Roller: The Stu Ungar Story
(2003)
|
|
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
|
|
Al Bernstein | ... |
Himself
|
| Andrew N.S. Glazer | ... |
Himself
|
|
| Michael Imperioli | ... |
Stu Ungar
|
|
|
|
Brian Kaplan | ... |
John Strzemp
|
| Michael Pasternak | ... | ||
| Jonathan Press | ... | ||
|
|
Evan Broder | ... |
Goldstein
|
| Todd Susman | ... |
Max Ungar
|
|
|
|
Tommy Canary | ... |
Sol
|
| Peggy Walton-Walker | ... |
Flo Unger
|
|
|
|
A.W. Vidmer | ... |
Gin Victim
|
| Michael Nouri | ... |
Vincent
|
|
|
|
Lon Gary | ... |
Poker Player #1
|
|
|
David Dwyer | ... |
Poker Player #2
(as David S. Dwyer)
|
| Steve Schirripa | ... |
Anthony
(as Steven R. Schirripa)
|
|
Based on the true story of the rise and fall of poker legend Stu "The Kid" Ungar.
What is it about certain films that generates such polar opposite reactions?
Some people here have called High Roller "disgusting." Some have called it "extraordinary" (as would I, actually).
Why? I think it's because films like this don't make heroes out of jerks, or glamour out of degeneration, and some people just can't deal with that emotionally. They NEED a hero. And I'd also add that if they're gamblers or poker players, they might feel personally betrayed when their existence isn't justified.
High Roller in NOT a poker movie. It's a PEOPLE movie. It's not perfect, but it looks good, is well-written, and wonderfully acted. And best of all, it generates an emotional response and inspires reflection.
And maybe that's what makes some people so damn mad.