Sherlock (TV 2002)Early in his crime-solving career, Sherlock Holmes attempts to prevent Moriarty from cornering the heroin market. Director:Graham Theakston |
|
| 0Share... |
Sherlock (TV 2002)Early in his crime-solving career, Sherlock Holmes attempts to prevent Moriarty from cornering the heroin market. Director:Graham Theakston |
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| James D'Arcy | ... | ||
| Roger Morlidge | ... | ||
| Gabrielle Anwar | ... |
Rebecca Doyle
|
|
| Vincent D'Onofrio | ... | ||
|
|
Nicholas Gecks | ... | |
|
|
Peter-Hugo Daly | ... |
Henry Coot
|
| Richard E. Grant | ... | ||
| Struan Rodger | ... |
Ben Harrington
|
|
|
|
Mihai Bisericanu | ... |
Sgt. Cox
|
|
|
Sandu Mihai Gruia | ... |
Dr. Cruickshank
(as Mihai Gruia Sandu)
|
|
|
Constantin Barbulescu | ... |
Captor #1
(as Costi Barbulescu)
|
|
|
Doru Dumitrescu | ... |
Captor #2
|
|
|
Constantin Vasilescu | ... |
Goldie Duggan
|
|
|
Corneliu Tigancu | ... |
Chinese Proprietor
|
|
|
Fritha Goodey | ... |
Anna
|
The game is afoot. This made for cable movie focuses on the young 20-something Sherlock Holmes. As the movie opens, Sherlock is in pursuit of the evil Moriarty and apparently shoots him to death, but his body cannot be found as he falls in a sewer. Ah, but anyone who knows the Holmes mythos knows that Moriarty is not so easily killed. Nonetheless, Holmes gains notoriety with the press and the police for his apparent killing of the evil Moriarty. This accomplishment brings him into the company of Dr. Watson, an early practitioner of autopsies, for the first time. Together, they start an investigation into the murder of several crimelords and become convinced that Moriarty is alive and behind a plot to organize drug dealing. Given that Moriarty is supposedly dead, Holmes finds it hard to convince Inspector Lestrade. Holmes investigation leads him to a beautiful prostitute, who posed as a rich woman to lure Holmes into the plot. Written by John Sacksteder <jsackste@bellsouth.net>
I liked the movie. I thought all the main characters did a really good job.
But I also have a very bad taste in movies. I think the Richard Grant thing was a bit unnecessary. The idea of bringing a past into it was interesting, but not really developed as much as it could have been. I never fully understood why they brought him in to the story and to be honest, even as a Richard Grant fan, I didn't care much about the character. He could have been brought a bit more into the story. But D'arcy was great. So was the guy who played Watson. Still, the way they left it off, there is room for sequels. So unless they bring Grant back into the story later, I don't know. I think the scene and he story were well done, but just not as necessary as everything else.