MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 112,747 this week

David Copperfield (1913)

 -  Drama  -  1 December 1913 (USA)
6.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.6/10 from 20 users  
Reviews: 2 user

Add a Plot

Director:

Writers:

(scenario), (novel)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 300 titles
created 01 Jan 2011
 
list image
a list of 612 titles
created 10 Sep 2011
 
list image
a list of 2071 titles
created 11 months ago
 
list image
a list of 9 titles
created 9 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: David Copperfield (1913)

David Copperfield (1913) on IMDb 6.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of David Copperfield.

User Polls

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Kenneth Ware ...
Reginald Sheffield ...
David Copperfield (as a child) (as Eric Desmond)
Len Bethel ...
Alma Taylor ...
H. Collins ...
Jack Hulcup ...
Jamie Darling ...
Edna May ...
Amy Verity ...
Cecil Mannering ...
Ella Fineberg ...
Miss Harcourt ...
Johnny Butt ...
Miss West ...
Shiel Porter ...
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

1 December 1913 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

(tinted and toned)

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Used many of the actual locations in which the novel was set. See more »

Connections

Version of David Copperfield (1958) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Problems with the Early Feature
4 November 2009 | by See all my reviews

This early feature-length film, "David Copperfield", doesn't hold up well today; moreover, it compares unfavorably with other early long films: including "Atlantis", "Ingeborg Holm", "The Student of Prague", "Traffic in Souls" and "Twilight of a Woman's Soul", which were all released in 1913 and from different nations. That's not even mentioning the superior contemporary short films. Cecil Hepworth's company, which made this "David Copperfield", made the far more cinematic "Rescued by Rover" back in 1905. Yet, "David Copperfield" is, by no means, the worst of its time, either. That its camera wasn't nailed to the proscenium arch of a stage raises it above some other filmed plays.

Nevertheless, this photoplay consists of shot-scenes (that is, no scene dissection) from long shot positions. In outdoor scenes, there's some awkward panning to keep action within frame--instead of using editing. In indoor scenes, the camera is a bit closer to the action, and the camera remains stationary. Acting is broad and theatrical, including the actor playing Uriah Heep constantly rubbing his hands in clichéd villainous fashion, but I've seen worse, and it's the least of this picture's problems. Most of the storytelling is told through title cards rather than shown cinematically, so it's no more than book illustrations to a truncated plotting of Dickens's novel. With so many of the early feature-length productions being of similar or worse quality than this "David Copperfield", it's a wonder they ever supplanted the one and two reel formats.


0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss David Copperfield (1913) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page