| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 17 reviews in total |
12 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
Disgusting, 4 October 2003
![]()
Author:
AishFan from San Jose, CA, US
This movie was absolutely repulsive. I don't know why stalwarts Amitabh and Zeenat chose to act in such a movie. The direction is completely pathetic. All the actors are just rambling on whatever is in the "script" and are making no sense whatsoever. They are mumbling jibber-jabbish, for a lack of anything better to do, that contain random multi-syllable English words in an effort to sound Western. Random scenes of sex and violence are dropped in, and continuous use of vulgar language (like every sentence has f... in it) is used hoping to attract people to the theaters. Money has been wasted on the most ridiculous things, such as using 400 carats of real diamonds, paying for accommodations in the world's most expensive hotel, and a special appearance by Bo Derek. What is she doing in this movie? She is in it for not more than five seconds. Oh, I think someone forgot the story. The "plot" has so many loopholes that it isn't supposed to make sense. You're just supposed to watch the sex and enjoy listening to the f-word. Whoever made this movie is a perverted psychopath. He is trying his movie to look Hollywood, and as a result, looks like a complete idiot.
9 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Doom, 8 January 2004
![]()
Author:
TheNecromancer from Texas
Good God. My eyes.. they still hurt..after being exposed to this movie.
But
the pain is mitigated, for my ears hurt even more, after having to listen
to
some of the most atrocious dialogue ever uttered.
I'd like to consider myself to be fairly tolerant. I managed to sit
through
Kaante. Mind you, i did not enjoy the debacle in the least, but I could
sit
through it. Boom is downright repulsive and ridiculous. I walked into the
theater with no expectation and still came out traumatized.
I smelt trouble the moment one of the actors appeared on screen and for no
rhyme or reason proceeded to say "Tick tock,tick f**king, tock f**king
tick"
in the most horrendous accent. After that it was all downhill.
Acting - Unbelievable. The three models should be banned from acting. For
some reason the director decided that it was best that they all put on
weird
accents. Almost all the dialogue is spoken in english. Apart from amitabh
bachan , i can quite safely state that none of the other actors speak
english. All the rest of the actors looked confused most of the time. I
honestly can't blame them for being at the mercy of a screwball
director.
Dialogue -Downright annoying. Characters say random things, act like
imbeciles on crack. The writer seems to be desperately trying to copy
Tarantino's writing style. He comes closer to imitating a drunk moron
who's
vocabulary doesn't exceed the F word. They use F**K generously and
randomly. It never even sounds normal at any point, for all of them have
such horrendous accents.
Plot - Mind Numbingly bad. It doesnt even pretend to have one. Characters
do
random things for absolutely no rhyme or reason. Amitabh Bachan throws a
female out of a moving car just for the heck of it. Zeenat's role in the
movie is even more worse. There are no character arcs. The story is too
absurd to be bothered about. To top it off there are plot holes the size
of
russia.
Overview - The movie is annoying, disgusting, repulsive, childish, inane,
moronic, absurd, incoherent, retarded,pointless, boring,
embarassing.
Those are its good qualities.
Rating 2/10.
What prevents me from giving it a one is the fact that it did have some
decent cinematography and production values.
7 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
Ground breaking movie by bollywood standards, 29 September 2003
Author:
Vinay from Miami
I had earlier seen Bombay boys by Kaizad Gustad, hence this prompted me to rent out the video for Boom. The name itself is pretty unusual for a bollywood movie and the cast is the best that bollywood has to offer. Jackie as "Medium" again shows Jackie's potential as a versatile actor and Javed Jaffery as "Boom Shankar" is his usual eccentric self. No wonder Kaizad decided to name the movie over his character, Javed Jaffery lends the comical edge to the otherwise dark-sided movie. 3 gangsters bade, chote and medium rule the fashion industry helped by boom shankar. In a world where everyone is being terrorised by the 3 brothers 3 models are forced to work for them. Taking advantage of their beauty and charms, supplemented by their utter distrust of each other and aided by Boom shanker - these 3 models fool everyone including Boom shankar himself. Madhu Sapre along with the Kaif lend the bitchish touch the models character, showing why beauty is skindeep. As expected this movie was treated like a shocker by the indian cinema houses, because by any bollywood standard this movie is ground breaking. For the simple reason that it does not follow the nuances of a commercial bollywood film and follows on Quinton Tarantino's path i vote this movie as a must see for every hindi film critic.
3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
THE WORST MOVIE EVER, 18 September 2003
![]()
Author:
Hussein (whusayn@hotmail.com) from Leicester, UK
I had very high expectations when i went to see this movie. However i was utterly dissapointed. The movie is a no-go straight from frame 1. You always think that the film will pick-up, but it never happens. I had expected something fresh and different and a gripping story line, and ofcourse a few laughs...but believe me i never laughed once in the film. One of the major things i was dissapointed with was Amitabh's characterisation. He was really wasted.... i think he only ahd 4 to 5 scenes in the film....i dont know why he did this movie. All the models in the film dont know how to act....and the rest of the cast are ok. I think Javed Jaffry is the one who shows out. He was above average. Overall a very very bad movie....After Bombay Boys, Kaizad Gustad has made a very bad mistake making this big huge flop.... try harder next time....please!
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Over the top effort to qualify ''its different", 16 May 2009
Author:
Avinash Patalay from Middle Earth
Make no mistakes, its a honest attempt to make avoid run-of-the-mill
movie. But somewhere the chord fails to strike in the failed attempt of
fashion-meets-underworld.
Kaizad manages to create layers in the movie, however there end up like
jigsaw puzzle. And it seems Kaizad was a strict teacher when it comes
to following-the-book owing to which its apparent that the actors are
mouthing the script akin to animated characters which immediately
springs up being artificial.
Big B: I felt his white-hair was a complete bad fashion statement.
Jaggu Dada:: The stoned dialogue delivery was a bad idea.
Gulshan Grover:: Leaves no impact, other than his fantasising of being
Bade Miyan.
Javed Jaffery:: His dialogues seemed OTT at a few places otherwise very
competent.
Seema Biswas & Zeenat Aman:: No complaints.
The three lasses - well, you are excused.
The grand finale.... well, it was kind of coming, so no suspense there.
5 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Only Boom Boom Bang Bang, 28 September 2003
![]()
Author:
CAMKG from Brampton, Ontario
You want to make a dark comedy and mix it with big spoonfuls of sex and
violence. And one reason that inspires you to do it is that for Hindi cinema
it would be ground-breaking. And then when you pitch your script to cast the
roles, you put together an ensemble that looks fantastic on paper. And then
you have the distributors knocking on your doors because the package looks
so damn good. And your reputation as a filmmaker who demolishes conventional
boundaries coupled with an awesome marketing campaign makes the film a
delicious event to look forward to.
But alas, you disappoint immensely. Not because you or the film lacks
intelligence. Not because the actors don't live up to their reputation. Not
because the music and photography don't add amazing tension and interest to
the film. And also not because the dark elements, the funny moments or the
sexual angles are missing. But because Mr. Gustad you have failed as a
writer in the film. You have been unable to give the film just that minimal
structure, so you could have balanced the dark and comedic elements of the
film. Your pen has failed in translating your vision perhaps even on paper,
but definitely on film.
Maybe you realised this sitting at the editing table with your editor,
because the film does seem very choppy at times. Or maybe you thought that
shortening the length would distract us from the flaws. But your energy and
originality are visible in every frame. Hopefully, in future you will be
able to collaborate with screenplay writers just as well as you have
collaborated with the actors here - who have all done well in spite of
wafer-thin characters. Maybe it was intentional; to an extent it does work -
but could have worked better. Style and substance should go hand in hand and
not invade each other's space.
You are a young budding genius whose future films I will be looking forward
to. Hopefully, film financiers and producers will continue to encourage and
recognize your future. In the meanwhile, Boom explodes like a grenade whose
pin came off suddenly. 5/10.
1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
style over substance, 30 May 2004
![]()
Author:
hellisotherpeople from east coast usa
OK kaizaad gustaad is suffering from a major Tarantino/wachkowski bros
( from their bound days)hangover..
while this movie is groundbreaking by bollywood standards, one cannot
but help feel a major sense of deja vue while watching it..seems to be
an overstylsed mish mash of QT movies ( which are themselves an homage
to hong kong movies)
the story is non existent,, the characters r not fleshed out and why is
it that EVERY mob character HAS to have a quirk/idiosyncrasy? Despite
that, the dialogs are clever and javed jaffrey excels..
I hope in his future films, kaizaad also pays a lil attention to the
substance! he's got the style thing down pat!
1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Great concept poorly executed, 25 September 2003
Author:
AVarma7283 from Los Angeles
Boom was a great concept with a great soundtrack. The publicity was
great
and of course what a great title. The title track with Ila Arun/Talvin
Singh
saved some of the film.
It seemed that most of the film was shot in daylight, which already
compromises the dramatic quality of the film. The director used master
shots
with wide lenses, which again compromises drama and character build up. It
seemed that the script was so loose that nothing seemed to stick. There
were
no character arcs and the movie came to an abrupt end. Even if violence
and
flesh are the idea, there are ways to make it tantalizing and provide for
tension. Moreover Kaizad's characters were not believable because he spent
little time on each with very limited staging. If a character spends all
his
time in one room, or doing just one thing, we cannot be too interested in
him. What we call 'Emotional Dynamics'.
The motivation was missing, why were the Dons after the models, when
they
didnt have the Diamonds? The limited locations and bright sunlight really
dampened the quality of the film. The only dramatic light was with the
Shroff character. The film had tremendous potential and a great concept in
the making but I guess they were in hurry to get the film
made.
I think Kaizad is a passionate filmmaker who has the guts to break new
ground, but in doing that, it is not wise to try and break all the basic
rules of story telling.
2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
So little with so much, 8 March 2004
![]()
Author:
M Alam (masudalam@yahoo.com)
Gustad is a lucky director in that he got to do a big film after the
mediocre Bombay Boys. For Boom he got the likes of Bachan, Shroff, Zeenat
Amaan et al and had the deep pockets to shoot at Burj Al Arab and pretty
much wherever he wanted in India and Dubai. He also had the names of Bo
Derek and Padma Lakshmi (Salman Rushdie's model girlfriend) to play up in
the marketing campaign... and what did he do with all this! He sank it
all.
He has three cuties in the cast who are raring to bare it all, and did
quite
often; he got tremendous performances from the lower league actors,
Gulshan
Grover and specially Javed Jaffrey; there's the ever sellable cocktail of
sex, drugs and money; and despite everything there ARE quite a few laughs
in
the film. So what went wrong?
The story. Or rather the lack of it. It seems Gustad was shooting on
random
notes rather than a script. The result is a series of shots - some
beautiful, sexy and very funny, others irrelevant or incomprehensible, or
both - put together in a jumpy fashion, and served up with a lot of
glitter
to make it look like a feature film.
Sound levels are particularly bad, and some of the dialogue is lost either
in strange accents the actors are putting on, or in the sound quality.
Seems
like the flick was only intended to be watched, not heard.
I watched the movie against many an advice, but I'd like to recommend it
to
all those who are interested in movies. Just to guage how so much can be
squandered to produce so little, if for no other reason.
2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Boomerang, 27 September 2003
![]()
Author:
Deepan Banati from New Delhi, India
Going to the movies is a wholesome experience for me. I look forward to
the
movie as soon I have my tickets booked. I have certain expectations from
the
movie and I switch off the outside world along with my cellphone as I
settle
in to watch the movie. This is how I settled down yesterday evening to
watch
this movie called Boom. The movie promised to have the elusive right mix
of
oomph and a real story coupled with good actors and behind it all a
director
who has been threatening to deliver for a long time. The spin-doctors had
given good publicity to the movie by making sure that its every round to
the
censors was well publicised along with the usual comments on whatever
happened to freedom of expression and self-censorship.
The two hours of the movie passed in a whirl and it was difficult for me
to
conclude on what was worse- the movie or the audience. I for once pitied
the
censor board who has to see such junk like this in its raw form and then
be
criticised for censoring parts of the movie. I also came out of the movie
with significant additions to my knowledge bank- I got to know, for
example,
that a bag of cement costs around 100 rupees or so and can be delivered
the
next day morning if it ordered around 7pm. How I know is because the
person
next to me was a cement dealer and obviously likes to conduct his business
on the phone in a cinema hall when he is not whistling or nudging his
partner everytime he saw a bikini on the screen. In addition, if I missed
a
double meaning dialogue in the movie then I only had to concentrate on the
animated conversation behind me to hear it again amid a thousand giggles.
With such wholesome entertainment all around me who wants to see the
movie.
Not that there was anything in the movie to watch. It's amazing how easily
you can go wrong even if you put a bunch of talented actors on screen and
some models who can also talk and a woman named Bo Derek thrown in for
some
more oomph. So much of oomph in that movie that I almost oomphed my way
out
of the hall! They were traces in the movie that reminded me of Pulp
Fiction
or even Sex and the City, which are both amazing productions in their own
right and if only he had copied them we would have got everything we
wanted.
But no sir, we are too much into the East meets West syndrome these days.
East meets West and takes a dive into the Pacific Ocean never to show
itself
again. Atleast not in the form of Boom! If this is what fusion of cultures
is about I am all for pure breeds. I cannot imagine that I paid money to
see
a movie like this. I won't see it even if someone offered me money for
this.
The movie is like an orchestra in action and everything is being played
out
of tune and what is worse is that you can recognise what they are trying
to
play and that is driving you even more crazy.
As for the crowd, what can I say, it deserved the movie as much as the
movie
deserved the crowd. Every show of skin and every raunchy dialogue were
greeted with such cheers that you would assume that these women had landed
in their laps! All this while cellphones were buzzing in the hall and
everybody was talking to everybody else telling them they were sitting in
a
hall watching a movie- and what's up?
Please go and see this movie and maybe it will help you appreciate how bad
movie making can get. Its always nice to see the worst so we can better
appreciate the good.
As for the director and producer - BOOM BOOM!!
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | External reviews |
| Parents Guide | Official site | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |