MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 11,078 this week

Cremaster 1 (1996)

 -  Short | Musical  -  6 July 2005 (France)
6.1
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.1/10 from 603 users  
Reviews: 6 user | 24 critic

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1451 titles created 2 months ago
 
a list of 26 titles created 17 Jan 2011
 
a list of 49 titles created 23 Apr 2012
 
a list of 30 titles created 27 Jan 2012
 
a list of 13 titles created 3 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Cremaster 1 (1996)

Cremaster 1 (1996) on IMDb 6.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Cremaster 1.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Marti Domination ...
Goodyear
Gemma Bourdon Smith ...
Goodyear Hostess in the Green Lounge
Kathleen Crepeau ...
Goodyear Hostess in the Green Lounge
Nina Kotov ...
Goodyear Hostess in the Green Lounge
Jessica Sherwood ...
Goodyear Hostess in the Green Lounge / Goodyear Chorus Girl
Tanyth Berkeley ...
Goodyear Hostess in the Red Lounge
Miranda Brooks ...
Goodyear Hostess in the Red Lounge
Kari McKahan ...
Goodyear Hostess in the Red Lounge
Catherine Mulchahy ...
Goodyear Hostess in the Red Lounge
Brooke Albus ...
Goodyear Chorus Girl
Sara Bearce ...
Goodyear Chorus Girl
Celeste Bolin ...
Goodyear Chorus Girl
Amanda Byram ...
Goodyear Chorus Girl
Holly Carlock ...
Goodyear Chorus Girl
Erin Caskey ...
Goodyear Chorus Girl
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Short | Musical

Certificate:

Unrated | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

6 July 2005 (France)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Follows Cremaster 4 (1995) See more »

Soundtracks

"Sun Pretty"
by A. Mawer
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Unblessed Soles
2 December 2006 | by (Virginia Beach) – See all my reviews

I'm going to comment on these one at a time as I see them. And I will see them in numerical order — there seems to be some difference of opinion as to what is best, but I'll work with the numbers that artist has assigned.

I come to this as someone concerned with cinematic narrative, explorations, experiments, adventures. And of course matters sexual are always worth tracing deeply.

If you don't know this, it is the first, numerically of five films that are the purest that can be termed "art" films. They aren't generally available via entertainment channels; parts of these can be viewed in a few museums. Sculptures featured in the films are sold by an art dealer who provides funding for the films. Seen commercially, the films are the context woven around the objects, a technique that in the ordinary world would be called advertising.

So starting out, there's a narrative here, the oldest one: "Buy this." Or more sensitively: "associate yourself with this in order to inherit the context we will plant in you." The film experience by itself is lovely, and if it weren't the beginning of a journey into the unknown, I would recommend it without qualification. I fear that marrying this man will bring unhappiness; there's something about giving the illusion of depth that doesn't reward serious investment. And films are always about serious investment; life is film.

What you'll see is choreography on a playing field, observed and controlled from paired blimps. More precisely and obviously the control is the hidden, newly stirring female impulse, that most female of impulses. Hidden and unacknowledged, but powerful.

All the humans we see are women. All the actions are those related to wombness, fruiting, exposing, silent weaving. You might think of it as eroticism for smart people. Pre-erotic.

What makes me hesitate in folding my dreams into this is the apparent obsession with notation. Its a dangerous thing for a sculptor to confuse shape with form. We'll see.

Meanwhile, it such a perfect notion, this business about us, the game of sex, influence from an abstract sky, ordered choreography by blind, hidden, newly stirring goddesses. Fruit.

Of the visual conventions, one is jarringly inelegant. Grapes provide the Steiner corpuscles of being here. Our twinned white goddesses purloin and internalize them, then eject or excrete them to appear as the action on the ground, skirts that vaginally speak to the world.

But where do our goddesses express these fruit? Through flares attached to the soles of one shoe. Its jarringly out of sync with everything else and one can only assume that among all the clever notions of flow, our artist couldn't imagine something more organic that stayed abstract but was connected to skin, or vessel.

Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.


8 of 10 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Cremaster 1 (1996) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?