| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Index | 21 reviews in total |
10 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Great !, 25 February 2005
Author:
Michael J. Santos from LA California, United States
We just went to see Jimmy Kimmel Live last night(2-24-05) and we
thought it was great ! Very professional production. Didn't have to
wait in line very long, like some other tapings. Security was good
also.
As far as the show is concerned - I think it is just as funny as its
competitors. The Cousin Sal bits are hilarious. Uncle Frank is a really
nice guy too ! If you are in the area, I would suggest getting tickets.
The audience isn't very large. Only about 100 people. The Band is great
and the sound system is superb.
I hat this 10 line rule. Again, I think this is a great hour of late
night television.
10 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Getting Better., 1 May 2004
Author:
RedWings91 from Detroit
This show got off to a bad start. As a fan of 'The Man Show' and Adam Carolla on the radio show 'Loveline', I felt obligated to watch this show. I watched from it's debut after the Super Bowl untill about July of it's first season, and then I stoped. ABC had watered down Kimmel's best comedic qualities and the show struggled to get celebrities that mattered. To often did Carolla have to be a guest on the show, only proving that Jimmy is only funny when he and Adam play off each others jokes. But, in order to not turn off women offended by 'The Man Show', Adam could not become Jimmy's Co-host on a permenante basis. So Jimmy relied on weekly doeses of members of the Kimmel-Carolla comedy family (Kathy Griffen, David Allan Grier, Snoop Dogg,etc.) as guest hosts and stumbled through live broadcasts. In October, things began to change. With the probability that Jimmy would be cancelled high, he began to try to be himself instead of Letterman or Leno. Ratings began to improve slightly. I returned to the show on Halloween, and by Thanksgiving began to like the show alot more. In like Januarey ABC began bringing in guests from one movie for one week. This way bigger celebrities came on to promote films and shows. In February the show gave into ABC's request to try the show without co-hosts and tape some episodes. By mid-April co-hosts were gone and within the last 3 weeks of this post, all episodes were being taped. Now you see people promoting big movies on Kimmel aswell as Leno and Letterman and Jimmy has begun to emerge as a possible third big late night show.
8 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Great Show, 17 June 2005
![]()
Author:
joehonaker from United States
His monologue is funny, he shows funny clips from current TV shows or World Events and he does a pleasant job of interviewing. Early on, he was given week-long co-hosts which I found a fun addition but they dropped the co-host and made him stand up for his monologue and the show does seem better although I miss Co-Hosts like David Cross, Snoop Dogg, Kathie Lee, Mike Tyson and Janeane Garofalo. His best guests have been Clay Aiken, Dane Cook(Hey Kool-Aid!), Wolf Blitzer(with Kimmel's father impersonating Wolf), Quentin Tarentino, Mike Tyson.... The show has the feel of Early Letterman with a slight edge. The Jake Byrd bits are always entertaining with Tony Barbieri playing an insane(but typical) Michael Jackson fanatic. His Cousin Sal hidden camera pranks are funny and the FCC This Week in Unnecessary Censorship is one of the funniest things on TV in the last 30 years. He has a running feud with the cast of The View and it's been very enjoyable watching him rip on Tons-O-Fun Starr Jones. Uncle Frank does an OK job and is sometimes funny on Red Carpet or Street interviews. Uncle Frank is clueless, it's funny for a little while but get's old and annoying. Geuermo's(sp) Hollywood Roundup is a little boring but the show is still one of the best late night shows. I wish he'd bring that hot hot hot girlfriend(Sarah Silverman)of his on the show more, she is one beautiful yenta. If he set out to best Leno, he could have done that with a pig farting on a snare drum because Leno is just weak unfunny and sad. Jimmy Kimmel Live rivals Letterman in the overall quality of show. Hopefully he will stay on long enough for the rest of the United States to smell what Jimmy Kimmel is cooking.
5 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
jimmy kimmel live, 29 December 2004
Author:
jim stephens from United States
Jimmy Kimmel Live is a different type of late night talk show. Jimmy is
a very creative person who has created a lot of shows, and is going for
a different audience than the usual. He is going for the person who
likes to see talk show guests, but also has a mix of live musical
entertainment, the Jimmy Kimmel concert series, as well as ongoing
members of the show doing various gags.
I think he is an excellent interviewer of his guests, and will make
them look good on his show, as well as going for questions you won't
hear others ask. His show edges more to the sort of show you always see
at the later hour (which it occupies now), but may be on earlier in the
future against the other two big late night shows.
The skits which are a part of the show include Cousin Sid and Uncle
Frank are a fun to see, and some guests doing things you'd never expect
them to do either.
I hope he has long running success on ABC and does well in the future.
10 out of 18 people found the following review useful:
great, 2 July 2003
Author:
colinwhitefan
I really like Jimmy Kimmel I find myself watching it more often than any other late night talk show. Jimmy isn't afraid to say something about anyone and he has some cool, interesting, and big name people on as either co-host or guests. I wouldn't be stunned if Jimmy Kimmel becomes the #1 late night talk show, Letterman, Leno, and the others have had their day.
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Watch JKL once and Leno, Letterman, Kilborn, & Conan seem tame and out-dated., 23 April 2003
Author:
missproducer from Orange, California
Jimmy Kimmel is brilliant. "Jimmy Kimmel Live" is the freshest, funniest
show on
TV. Period. Despite a lack of big name celebrities (due to Leno's scare
tactics)
JKL has managed to flourish; largely due to Kimmel's quick wit and off the
wall
segments. What other show would feature Mike Tyson singing, a
pillow-fight between Goldberg and Jimmy's cousin Sal, Jay Mohr doing
Nyquil
shots, Snoop Dogg at the swap-meet and a gangsta spelling bee? And
what
other host would dare dance in his underwear and a fig leaf with a
Japanese
pop band on live TV? Only Jimmy Kimmel on JKL that's who.
Thank you Jimmy for resuscitating television.
Potential- but needs to be FUNNY, 18 September 2003
Author:
autumnrhythm from New Jersey, US
I liked many of the pieces put together on the Man Show. I never liked
Jimmy
on "Win Ben Stein's Money" but I always loved Adam Carolla on the Howard
Stern Show, so I checked it out. Since Jimmy is a devotee of David
Letterman
and Howard, I thought this show would be cool.
To my surprise, Jimmy is above average with guests (already better than
Leno
and better than Conan when he first started). And Jimmy is more of a
common
man than Conan or Dave- and quite more blunt and irreverent. However,
Jimmy's main potential was to make late night comedy far bluer and
politically incorrect than it is. He has failed to do that.
After coming out with an interview in Playboy saying his show would be
"the
comedy version of the Tonight Show!" Jimmy has instead hired hack writers
(many first time proper "comedy" writers) to come up with sub-Leno/Conan
bits. In other words, no punch lines, a lot of doctored pictures and
video
and random clips from TV shows that prompt Jimmy to make fun of
them.
His first act (a.k.a. monologue) is, to be perfectly frank, unfunny. The
jokes just aren't there. I don't know what the excuse could be for that.
Howard Stern, at this late stage, is STILL funnier just going off the
cuff.
Jimmy and his numerable writers have all day to come up with jokes that
make
Jay Leno sound like Chris Rock, for God's sake.
The other major problem is the guest co-hosts: nice stunt, but the fun is
wearing off. When you have a five-year-old rapper for a co-host or that
old
stand-by Mr. T, it's time to find a regular who can contribute to the
comedy. After five days, it's just not funny. And if people don't like
this
host, you're wasting an entire segment of the show on them. Only a few
guest
co-hosts have been great, but it's not necessary to have them for five
straight shows.
I honestly hope they revamp the show on their first anniversary and get a
regular co-host (Adam Carolla would be first choice, but clearly
Jimmy/ABC
wanted to go without him) as they have with the announcer.
Clever and a little Odd, 4 March 2003
Author:
chillymost from California
I think this show is funny and very clever. I think that maybe some people don't get Jimmy's humor. It's offbeat and he doesn't go for the obvious like Leno and Letterman. I like that he puts himself out there, even if his taste is a little on the odd side. I think it is worth staying up late for. Give it a couple weeks and I think you will become a fan too.
4 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Getting up there, 15 July 2004
Author:
Carrie Beth Anderson from Houston, Texas
I wouldn't say that Jimmy Kimmel Live has reached the caliber of other late night talk shows such as Late Night with Conan O'Brian, it is an incredibly interesting show. As a Mighty Mighty BossTones fan, I loved the choice to hire Dicky Barrett as the permanent announcer. Some other parts of the show I like are "Unneccessary Censorship", "Dress the Band", "Sit and Be Fit", and Dicky's compliment. I predict that within a year Jimmy Kimmel will be the top late night TV host. If you haven't seen it I highly recommend it. Another great part of J.K.L is the choice of bands and guests. I do miss the co-host for the week idea, but the show has gotten progressively better without it, so whatever works, right.
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Jimmy Kimmel Show on Friday, 04/21/06, 22 April 2006
Author:
jill_holl from United States
I'm not a regular viewer of this show but watched this episode because Regis Philbin was scheduled to appear. Thought the interview with Regis was great. Especially enjoyed hearing Regis & Jimmy sing & liked Regis' idea for a singing celebrities TV show.Why not? There's been a dancing with celebrities show, a skating with celebrities show, a cooking celebrities show. Think a show with celebrities who do not sing for a living, but have some musical talent combined with a musical "coach",competing over a 6 or 10 week period could be a fun summer replacement show. The show could be divided into categories such as solo singers, singers with a group, etc. There could be a panel of "experts" who vote each week & the public can vote each week as well (using the same type of voting system that was used on the Dancing with The Stars TV show), thereby eliminating someone each week until there is one winner in each category. Of course, the show should have a witty/funny host such as Tom Bergeron and an opposite sex co-host. What do other viewers think? Glad to hear about the award that Regis has won. He deserves it.
| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Ratings | Awards | External reviews |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |