230 out of 319 people found the following comment useful :- Bias is downfall of this movie, 22 January 2005
Author:
cybersrfr1287120 from United States
I would not consider myself to be an ultra liberal, but I am somewhat
knowledgeable about what has been going on in South America for the
last 100 years, and Che Guevara is a part of it. Going into this movie
all I knew about him was that he is on a lot of t-shirts, and that
"che", despite what ignorant people think, is not his name, it is what
Argentinians say to each other like in the US saying "dude".
I am also a big fan of the purity of movies, not this Spider-man crap
that is all over the place, but the true art of films, and I am fairly
serious when I go into a movie for the first time. A part of this is
that I watch the movie throwing all bias I might have out the window
and watch it as if I had never heard of it before. That said, I believe
this movie was excellent because it had superb cinematography of the
beauty of South America, had excellent acting, great chemistry between
the two main actors (despite Ebert saying they did not), and an overall
political theme.
This movie did not get great reviews in the US, and I haven't seen
reviews from Latin American countries, but I am guessing they are
better. This is because many people either shied away from the movie
once they heard the word Che, and if they did see it, through the whole
movie they were probably thinking "commie, commie!".
I have since read up on Che Guevara, and he is actually a fascinating
person to study because he began as a rich boy who through his journeys
learned how much people were suffering beyond his imagination, and part
of this was how he got to be so rich, by suppressing the native people.
The movie does an excellent job of showing this transition from his
carefree exploring until later having an epiphany about his destiny to
help the people. Yes, he got extreme after a while, but the study of
him is compelling nonetheless.
It is interesting to know that coffee and bananas that say "Guatemala"
are still grown today by slave laborers on farms, and that the US does
not mind the slave labor because they were the ones who sponsored a
coup in 1951 to install a dictatorship that in history books says it
was an ousting of communism, which makes it okay. This is a much bigger
and important example than the movie, but it is the same bias involved:
People in the United States (I don't say America because that refers to
every country from Argentina to Canada, not just the US as people in
this country like to think) not only don't care about the suffering of
people in other countries (unless it's mentioned on Oprah or involves
economic rewards) but have the nerve to call them evil when they try to
better themselves, which at the time was the communist movement in
South America. This is not the communism of Castro or even of the later
Che Guevara, but simply to give more to the starving and suppressed
that are today suppressed to make your bananas and Starbucks coffee.
Because of the biases people have towards the people of countries they
know nothing about, this movie has been extremely underrated in the
wake of films that comparatively suck ("Ray", way overrated) yet have
been rewarded because of their popularity and appeasement to the
ignorant people that attend theaters in the United States.
136 out of 152 people found the following comment useful :- Great acting, direction and story - Oscar worthy, 8 December 2004
Author:
gauad from San Diego, CA
This movie is based on the true story that took Ernesto Guevara (Gael
Garcia Bernal) and Alberto Granado (Rodrigo de la Serna) on a road trip
all across and along South America in the 1950's. The script/direction
elegantly avoids any politics or similar. Its focus is on the human
transformation of two young Argentine professionals, a turning point in
their lives, who decide to see their continent with their own eyes.
This movie only covers Che Guevara's life BEFORE he became the famous
Che Guevara. Most of us would agree with Che's goals but less, I guess,
would agree with his means. However, the movie concentrates on how the
world changed Ernesto which in turn led him to try to change the world.
The movie ends at the end of their road trip. I understand that there
is another movie in the making (with Benicio del Toro) which will show
the rest of Che' s life, with politics and flying bullets included. The
acting of the movie is first class: Gael Garcia Bernal performs at his
best; however it is Rodrigo de la Serna's performance the one that is
simply outstanding; not only he represents Granado's as a funny,
outgoing character, but he also highlights Gael's characterization of
Guevara. Great photography, humor, action, and drama are all
ingredients of this movie. If you want to watch a movie that deals with
reality and that contrasts with Hollywood's fantasies, this is your
movie. You'll laugh, may be cry, but for sure you'll leave the theater
thinking about a few things. Finally, this movie ironically represents
Che's ultimate goal, a unified continent: the director is Brazilian,
the main actor Mexican, the main actress and supporting actor
Argentinean, the script writer is from Puerto Rico and the producer,
Robert Redford is American. And, the movie was filmed in Argentina,
Chile and Peru. Length: 2hs 04 min.
108 out of 115 people found the following comment useful :- A sorely needed window on South America, 28 April 2004
Author:
(leloo28@hotmail.com) from New York, New York
The Motorcycle Diaries does a great job of sketching out the
character of Ernesto Guevara de la Serna, without any pandering
to our knowledge of who he will become. There are no cheap
shots and only one 'Che' joke-to explain the origin of the
nickname, which is a play on the Argentinian accent. It's a deeply
felt examination of the events that inspired the development of a
political consciousness, with only a few touches of the
hagiography that has developed around 'el Che' and those not
until late in the film. Gael Garcia Bernal is completely believable
and very human in the role, and there's real chemistry between
him and Rodrigo de la Serna (any relation?) who plays his friend
Granado, leading to a lot of funny moments-important, as ther
are many stretches of the movie where it is just them and the
scenery. The cinematography is truly gorgeous, and reminded me
how little of the South American landscape we ever see on film in
the U.S. The cinematographer has pulled off a major feat in
shooting a period film in slightly grainy, sometimes shaky
hand-held. No crane shots or sepia tinting here-the film quality
immerses you in Guevara and Granado's experiences and makes
them feel very immediate, without sacrificing any sense of
history.
A film like this is long overdue, and it deserves wide distribution.
While the plot revolves around Che's awakening to the social
struggles of South America (which are ongoing) there is a rich
sense of place, and people, and beauty here. It seems to me that
this is the first South American film in a few years that is not a
world-weary documentary about social or political problems (and
U.S. involvement in them), to open in the U.S. market. It's about the
life of Che, yes, but it doesn't forget the people and problems that
lead him into political activity, and will hopefully inspire viewers to
pay more attention to what is going on around them, not only in
Buenos Aires, Cuzco, Havana or Chiapas, but right next
door.
71 out of 84 people found the following comment useful :- REVALATORY A REVOLUCIONARY, 5 October 2004
Author:
george.schmidt (george.schmidt@hbo.com) from fairview, nj
THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES (2004) ***1/2 Gael Garcia Bernal,
Rodrigo De la Serna, Mia Maestro. (Dir: Walter Salles)
Che Guevera is sadly best known today as a mysterious icon for a pop
culture ironic t-shirt sported by the supposedly hip and political.
Few, including this reviewer, really knew much more about the firebrand
revolutionist who was a comrade in Cuban arms with Fidel Castro in a
crusade that led to his eventual capture and execution by the CIA as a
notorious fly-in-the-ointment career criminal.
However new insight albeit a few shades of grey and free styling
dramatic license intact depicts a twenty something medical student
named Ernesto Guevera da la Serna, a South American native (memorably
portrayed by the ever soulful Bernal, in a truly outstanding
breakthrough performance) who partners with his best friend Alberto
Granado (strongly supportive De la Serna) on a trek by motorcycle (a
battered 1939 Norton to be exact) an 800 plus mile quest from Argentina
up thru the upper regions of Peru with nothing but a few provisions and
even less dinero.
Relying on their bonhomie, make-shift surroundings and clever
improvisation the odd couple manage to get to Ernesto's girlfriend's
nouveau riche family where he tells the lovely Chichina Ferreyra (the
fetching Maestro) that he wants her to wait for him but knows in his
heart this is more than likely never to be.
After several humorous encounters along the fray the duo finally have
to give up their trusty vehicle after many hardships and torrential
weather obstacles to go on foot then finally on ferry to their
destination: an internship with a leper colony. Along the way the duo
meet many disenfranchised and impoverished fellow countrymen and their
women and families and with each soul-crushing pit-stop you can feel
the stirrings of ire catching fire within the young man who will become
Che Guevera.
Salles, who directed the exceptional CENTRAL STATION, smartly allows
his two fine actors plenty of room to get into the skins of their
funny, fighting and deep souled characters while enlisting the
picturesque surroundings of the lush and jaw-droppingly beautiful
playas, mountains and countryside (exquisitely rendered by ace
cinematographer Eric Gautier) and underlies the proceedings with a
hauntingly stirring score by Gustavo Santaolalla.
But it is Bernal who is most powerful in his implosive, soulful and
heartfelt turn as the young impassioned man just about to break for
greatness; the same can be said of this talented actor's star bursting
career.
57 out of 63 people found the following comment useful :- Humanism, Awareness, Coming of Age: The Soul of Revolution, 26 November 2004
Author:
gradyharp from United States
THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES is certainly one of the finest films of the year
- a daring, compassionate re-creation of the journey of two young,
well-to-do Argentinean lads who leave their privileged positions of
biochemist and fourth year Medical student to follow their idea of
traveling by motorcycle from their native Buenos Aires down to
Patagonia, up through Chile, Peru, Colombia to Venezuela. Sounds like a
light hearted Trip Movie, but instead this journey, factually made by
one Ernesto (aka 'Che' and 'Fuser') Guevara de la Serna and his close
friend Alberto Granado ('Chubby'), is one of the most touching and
sensitive passages into self acceptance and awareness of the world as a
place where equality of people is a microscopic speck of illusion that
is revealed by a carefully constructed script by Jose Rivera based on
the diaries of both of these men made during and after their journey.
Walter Salles ("Behind the Sun", "Central Station") once again proves
himself a director who can infuse his vision of a story with
uncomplicated directness of approach, having the sensitivity to allow
his well-chosen actors to create wholly believable, three-dimensional
characters, whether the actors are the leads or simply minor roles that
hold the camera's eye for seconds.
Taken as simply a movie to enjoy, THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES is as
beautiful as a National Geographic Magazine feature on the Amazon and
the deserted and populated lands of South America. But given his
re-creation of Che Guevara's and Alberto Granado's meaningful excursion
into manhood this movie goes far beyond entertainment and enters that
rarefied arena of psycho biography. Traveling on an old motorcycle, the
two lads encounter hunger, accidents, lusting after women at every
stop, ingratiating panhandling, and the gradual revelation of the
quality of life of the indigenous peoples of South America. They are
touched by the plights of the people, the people in turn love the boys,
and they eventually spend three weeks living and working in a
leprosarium run by the nuns, adding their knowledge of medicine to
helping not only the physical needs of the lepers but finding ways to
break the psychosocial ostracism that historically curses the
'unclean'. Breaking down these barriers, forming strong relationships
with those tending the lepers as well as the lepers themselves, lays
the seeds of 'revolution' or Change in the minds of the lads,
especially Ernesto or 'Che'. The film does not begin to preach or to
make the Che Guevara of Cuban militancy fame a hero: it doesn't have
to, as the transformation in the mind of Che is so beautifully subtle.
The journey has given him the insight that he must devote himself to
changing the inequality and poverty of his America. The events that
followed this Motorcycle journey are provided in voice over, black and
white footage of people's faces, and a final scene in Havana at the
ending of the film. No more need be said.
Gael Garcia Bernal gives an incredibly thoughtful, stunning portrayal
of Che, saying so much more with his eyes, his body language
(especially as he suffers through his own physical demon of asthma
attacks), and his perfect embodiment of the spirit of a man who becomes
enlightened by the peasants he comes to love. Bernal is already a
brilliant actor and a magnetic screen presence, and if he is not
nominated for an Oscar for this unique, artful role it will be a major
surprise. His is a career to watch! Likewise Rodrigo de la Serna is
completely immersed in his role as Alberto and shows the same quality
of quiet growth as a character as the movie progresses. ALL of the many
extras in this huge cast are memorable: the leper colony abounds with
some of the most touching human beings ever captured on film. The
camera work, the musical scoring, the obvious commitment on the part of
everyone involved in this glorious picture - every aspect of THE
MOTORCYCLE DIARIES is exactly right. Ten Stars for this one! In Spanish
with English subtitles
47 out of 60 people found the following comment useful :- Excellent Film, Deserves Award, 14 November 2004
Author:
dreams_sahara from California
The Motorcycle Diaries is a tale of Che's life prior to becoming a
revolutionary political figure. We follow Che and his friend on a
cross-country road trip, a journey into the unknown. The film was
beautifully filmed. It really makes you want to travel and go to see
some of the South/Central American countries.
The acting was superb. Gael Garcia Bernal is not new to the screen. He
has delivered amazing performances in both Amores Perros and Y Tu Mama
Tambien. He does not disappoint in this movie. Newcomer, Rodrigo De La
Serna, also gives an excellent performance.
Regardless of your politics and personal views of Che, you will walk
away from this movie feeling a bit better about humanity.
I'm hoping this pulls Best Foreign Oscar.
43 out of 60 people found the following comment useful :- 8/10, 11 November 2004
Author:
desperateliving from Canada
I am not a student of Che Guevara; I saw this because, like many
people, I find Guevara to be an interesting, charismatic character. And
I find Bernal to be just as charismatic an actor, so it doesn't bother
me that this film doesn't focus on politics -- this is not an
incitement to revolution, this is a road movie about a character who
happened to become a legend later in life. (It may just as well have
been about someone who would later become a social worker.) The entire
film is unassuming and understated, and as it goes along it achieves
what might be called a pleasant dullness in tone. It's not boring or
flat -- we're constantly involved with these two characters -- but it's
also not some stinging, brilliant piece of movie-making. This isn't a
director trying to show off his stuff. The film works basically
according to road movie rules: our characters bump into other
characters on their long and winding journey, there's sex and love, and
the whole thing is geared toward a self-discovery. But the film wisely
doesn't tell us what, exactly, Guevara discovers; it relies on the
events (a group of miners treated like cattle; lepers treated like,
well, lepers) to let us surmise what that will be. And it's an
especially nice touch, I think, that the film itself is as dedicated to
people as Che is within the film. (Witness the final scenes.)
I think Bernal's presence in film right now is tremendously important.
I don't think it's too much of an exaggeration to say that he is to
Latin America what Alain Delon was to French cinema in the '60s. (What
other foreign language actor can inspire 13-year-old American girls to
seek out a film by Almodovar?) He's terrific here as a presence and as
a character. It's a character very scripted -- when he shakes the hands
of a leper without gloves, it's meant to be an Important Moment -- but
Bernal manages to capture the essence of something larger. That may be
due simply to his looks: he has a gorgeous skin tone, and he emanates a
kind of golden brown hue. When he smiles, his snout upturned, it
shatters any possibility of labeling his performance as mannered. It's
never show-offy or unpleasant to watch; he inhabits his character so
smoothly that you don't notice it -- it's totally natural. He plays a
character with a romantic sickness, as well, to add something to his
aura. (He has a kind of intense asthma; basically, he breathes heavily
and looks like he's dying, not unlike Val Kilmer in "Tombstone.")
Enjoyable as the film often is -- and it's certainly a beautifully-made
film; the soundtrack and the locations and cinematography are very nice
-- you sometimes wish that the director could somehow manage to infuse
the film with a passionate Spanish narrative and still keep the clean,
unsentimental atmosphere that he creates. 8/10
39 out of 57 people found the following comment useful :- A Politically Thoughtful and Pretty Grand Tour of South America, 15 October 2004
Author:
noralee from Queens, NY
"The Motorcycle Diaries" (Diarios de motocicleta) works more
effectively as a bio-pic than on its own as a road movie.
The scenery throughout Latin America is beautiful and the two leads are
very affecting, especially Gael García Bernal as Ernesto Guevara de la
Serna when "Che" is still nascent.
But it's surprising how undramatic what happens that turns a sweet,
middle-class med student into a revolutionary. He was already a liberal
who wanted to help leprosy patients, so what happens isn't a complete
turn-around -- even when they are broke, they can wire home for more
money. Rather it sets off an internal thoughtfulness that is difficult
to catch on film.
Mostly just leaving his sheltered life, particularly being dropped by
his wealthy girlfriend, and seeing the continent, especially his first
exposure to the indigenous peoples who suffer the most in every South
American country even while tourists are visiting the ruins of their
ancestors, becomes the nexus of his pan-continental political ideals.
He is mostly an observer and inconsistent protester of injustice, not a
victim -- it's startling that his culminating noble sojourn at the
leper colony, where he can put his skills and indivisible warmth to
specific good, is only for three weeks.
So there's no eye-opening "Grapes of Wrath" conflict, though he is
always contrasted with his carefree companion, Alberto Granado. Their
close camaraderie is well-captured and Ernesto has a profound impact on
him, as we learn in a final biographical summary.
It is amusing that Ernesto contradicts the stereotype of the Latin male
sensualist and is a terrible dancer to the lovely soundtrack.
24 out of 37 people found the following comment useful :- A personal journey, 15 September 2004
Author:
carlos.virgile-3 from London,England
Why a film about Che now? Why suddenly a revival of a revolutionary
hero?
Apathy, political blandness and complacency are the characteristics of
today's world when compare with the 60's generation, and any left
revolutionary dogma seems, for many reasons, to have been put at rest
for the time being and until further notice. The relevance of this film
today has many different facets and its success is particularly
interesting at a moment of change, when wars, political and economical
crisis and their global effects, are starting to provoke some reaction
suggesting that involvement might just be around the corner. Wisely the
film concentrates on following Guevara diaries before becoming
radicalised and in the process of gaining knowledge and awareness of
the struggle of the Latin American unprivileged classes and prior to
breaking up with his middle class ties. The film has had many viewers
that have criticized the lack of a stronger political definition in the
portrait of the lead character, a more radical view of Guevara and of
its political stand even at that early stage in his life. The film
makes his image more digestible for a general audience, showing him in
a sympathetic light and from a softer perspective. In my view this is
exactly what it makes it relevant and interesting for today's
audiences. Although the film grows in the memory as being a touch more
political than what perhaps Walter Salles aimed for, it doesn't intend
to preach politics or even try to be a full-blown biopic of an
historical and controversial figure. What makes the message strong is
the fact that we actually know who the character eventually will become
after the story of the film finishes and the end titles start to run,
that makes it rather more poignant. We only witness the beginning of
his personal journey and know how much he will travel. The film is more
about personal choices, experiences and decisions that eventually might
change the course of a life, and particularly about the spirit of being
young. The film recreates the freedom of adolescence, a time for
absorbing and experimenting, the start of a trek where we discover the
world and where justice and a hope for change is strongly embedded with
the attitude of the young. Or at least that happen in the 60's
generally and particularly in Latin America. The real quality of the
film is that through a subtle, engaging, fun tale allows the audience
to connect with a period where change, personal and internal, was
possible, and where there was hope for a fairer future.
For anyone like myself from Argentina, part of a generation that were
there and young at the time, the film evokes just that starting point.
It is a rather emotional journey that takes back a whole generation
that had firm beliefs in these ideals, as relevant today as they were
in 1952 where the action of the film ends and Guevara flights back home
shaken by the whole travel experience. It is rather significant that
not that much has changed for the better in the Latin America of today,
where the gap between the 'haves' and the 'have nots' has, if anything,
grown wider. The film is simple and straightforward showing the real
talent of Walter Salles for avoiding patronising his audience as he
conveys an accurate portrait of the landscape and its people. There is
perhaps some excessive 'under acting' on the approach from Gael Garcia
Bernal to his performance [ ...was Che really ever such a "softie"?]
but still, it is great to see him growing as an actor and as Che
through the film. To counter balanced such a restrained interpretation,
Rodrigo de la Serna projects the right dosage of charm and Argentinean
street wisdom that gives the warmth and humanity the film exudes. The
music of Gustavo Santaolaya adds a layer of depth and intensity whilst
rightly avoiding, like the rest of the film, most of the traditional
clichés of the South American image.
12 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :- Sheer brilliance, 8 August 2006
Author:
Stampsfightclub from United Kingdom
From director Walter Salles comes a very moving road journey which had
me completely spellbound by the end and I'm sure would gain many
viewer's hearts as the infamous director dives deep into many different
issues.
The story centres around two young doctors going on a motorbike journey
around the world, not for personal gain but for the experience. This
idea was completely outstanding. It gives the audience an understanding
of young people's desires, not for personal gains such as money but for
an experience into real life issues and wishing to know more about the
world around them. These ideas I'm sure would make viewers aspire to be
like the central characters to go out and explore the world and that
was a reason why I personally loved this drama, because it gives
inspiration to the audience and really moves them in a way which will
leave you completely spellbound.
The film centres on many issues but one which stuck out for me was the
heavy ideologies of health. In the year 1950 there were many health
issues present in the poorer counties such as Peru and this Oscar
winning drama is able to capture these issues magnificently. The two
central protagonists are doctors and are wishing to help others with
their knowledge and expertise as they explore the less fortunate
countries to help with the many depressing health problems the
countries are experiencing. There is a very highly emotional driven
scene when the lead character tries to help a very ill woman who is
refusing to be treated. Tensions are always running high in the latter
stages of the film when many issues are wishing to be resolved and the
central protagonists are putting themselves on the line to help the ill
residents of the poor countries.
Having changes in situations was a very powerful technique. The
characters experience a poor life and a rich life. Audiences will see
different perspectives of life in the 1950s when seeing there are poor
and rich countries and are divided by the smallest differences, such as
illnesses. We also see more joyous moments and highly emotional driven
scenes which also gives a sense of how life is, the good and bad sides
are both expressed in equal amounts which in my opinion was a fantastic
move and will capture your heart as it did mine
Centred on the 1950s the film captured the essence of the politically
driven time beautifully. Audiences see job issues, money problems and
country matters which all juxtapose perfectly to capture the essence of
the time and crate a high realism in context of the time
The acting by everyone involved is absolutely outstanding and it
confused me when not one received an Oscar nomination because Gael
Garcia Bernal and Rodrigo De la Serna are remarkable as the two
travellers. Both dealing with their own issues we see different types
of characters but similar characteristics to which made the film more
believable of society where opinions are divided but also shared.
Bernal plays a character who is always saying what he feels and is
never wishing to back down from anyone or anything and he pulled it off
tremendously. The passion he creates as the central protagonist Guevara
is utterly astonishing as he deals with asthma problems, love lives and
money issues. It's a lot for him to take as he realises how serious
life can be. Serna to also pulls off a classic performance as the older
more experienced of the two who is always looking for that little bit
more than his fellow traveller.
Using different countries such as Peru, Venezuela, and Spain allows
viewers to gain an insight into the vastness of life. Using poor
countries as well as rich countries allows viewers to see different
sides to the world in the 1950s and was pulled off greatly. The
characters can therefore experience what a posh life is like as well as
what life in the fast lane gives them. The camera work is astonishing.
Shooting from Venezuela, Peru etc we see different perspective of the
countries. The scenery is always beautiful with shots of the towns in a
poor state and the general background of the countries is to be
admired. The shots of the bike on the roads are to be admired. The
camera moves adjacent to the bike giving the realistic effect of the
bike moving fast along the empty roads, gaining a sense of freedom and
enjoyment.
From watching this film I can say I have been inspired to get on a
motorbike and explore the world. Seeing what the central protagonists
saw will inspire many as it has inspired me and I have no hesitation in
recommending this Oscar winning drama to anyone.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglinestrailers and videospostersphoto galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Diarios de motocicleta (2004)
230 out of 319 people found the following comment useful :-

Bias is downfall of this movie, 22 January 2005
Author: cybersrfr1287120 from United States
I would not consider myself to be an ultra liberal, but I am somewhat knowledgeable about what has been going on in South America for the last 100 years, and Che Guevara is a part of it. Going into this movie all I knew about him was that he is on a lot of t-shirts, and that "che", despite what ignorant people think, is not his name, it is what Argentinians say to each other like in the US saying "dude".
I am also a big fan of the purity of movies, not this Spider-man crap that is all over the place, but the true art of films, and I am fairly serious when I go into a movie for the first time. A part of this is that I watch the movie throwing all bias I might have out the window and watch it as if I had never heard of it before. That said, I believe this movie was excellent because it had superb cinematography of the beauty of South America, had excellent acting, great chemistry between the two main actors (despite Ebert saying they did not), and an overall political theme.
This movie did not get great reviews in the US, and I haven't seen reviews from Latin American countries, but I am guessing they are better. This is because many people either shied away from the movie once they heard the word Che, and if they did see it, through the whole movie they were probably thinking "commie, commie!".
I have since read up on Che Guevara, and he is actually a fascinating person to study because he began as a rich boy who through his journeys learned how much people were suffering beyond his imagination, and part of this was how he got to be so rich, by suppressing the native people. The movie does an excellent job of showing this transition from his carefree exploring until later having an epiphany about his destiny to help the people. Yes, he got extreme after a while, but the study of him is compelling nonetheless.
It is interesting to know that coffee and bananas that say "Guatemala" are still grown today by slave laborers on farms, and that the US does not mind the slave labor because they were the ones who sponsored a coup in 1951 to install a dictatorship that in history books says it was an ousting of communism, which makes it okay. This is a much bigger and important example than the movie, but it is the same bias involved: People in the United States (I don't say America because that refers to every country from Argentina to Canada, not just the US as people in this country like to think) not only don't care about the suffering of people in other countries (unless it's mentioned on Oprah or involves economic rewards) but have the nerve to call them evil when they try to better themselves, which at the time was the communist movement in South America. This is not the communism of Castro or even of the later Che Guevara, but simply to give more to the starving and suppressed that are today suppressed to make your bananas and Starbucks coffee.
Because of the biases people have towards the people of countries they know nothing about, this movie has been extremely underrated in the wake of films that comparatively suck ("Ray", way overrated) yet have been rewarded because of their popularity and appeasement to the ignorant people that attend theaters in the United States.
136 out of 152 people found the following comment useful :-

Great acting, direction and story - Oscar worthy, 8 December 2004
Author: gauad from San Diego, CA
This movie is based on the true story that took Ernesto Guevara (Gael Garcia Bernal) and Alberto Granado (Rodrigo de la Serna) on a road trip all across and along South America in the 1950's. The script/direction elegantly avoids any politics or similar. Its focus is on the human transformation of two young Argentine professionals, a turning point in their lives, who decide to see their continent with their own eyes. This movie only covers Che Guevara's life BEFORE he became the famous Che Guevara. Most of us would agree with Che's goals but less, I guess, would agree with his means. However, the movie concentrates on how the world changed Ernesto which in turn led him to try to change the world. The movie ends at the end of their road trip. I understand that there is another movie in the making (with Benicio del Toro) which will show the rest of Che' s life, with politics and flying bullets included. The acting of the movie is first class: Gael Garcia Bernal performs at his best; however it is Rodrigo de la Serna's performance the one that is simply outstanding; not only he represents Granado's as a funny, outgoing character, but he also highlights Gael's characterization of Guevara. Great photography, humor, action, and drama are all ingredients of this movie. If you want to watch a movie that deals with reality and that contrasts with Hollywood's fantasies, this is your movie. You'll laugh, may be cry, but for sure you'll leave the theater thinking about a few things. Finally, this movie ironically represents Che's ultimate goal, a unified continent: the director is Brazilian, the main actor Mexican, the main actress and supporting actor Argentinean, the script writer is from Puerto Rico and the producer, Robert Redford is American. And, the movie was filmed in Argentina, Chile and Peru. Length: 2hs 04 min.
108 out of 115 people found the following comment useful :-
A sorely needed window on South America, 28 April 2004
Author: (leloo28@hotmail.com) from New York, New York
The Motorcycle Diaries does a great job of sketching out the character of Ernesto Guevara de la Serna, without any pandering to our knowledge of who he will become. There are no cheap shots and only one 'Che' joke-to explain the origin of the nickname, which is a play on the Argentinian accent. It's a deeply felt examination of the events that inspired the development of a political consciousness, with only a few touches of the hagiography that has developed around 'el Che' and those not until late in the film. Gael Garcia Bernal is completely believable and very human in the role, and there's real chemistry between him and Rodrigo de la Serna (any relation?) who plays his friend Granado, leading to a lot of funny moments-important, as ther are many stretches of the movie where it is just them and the scenery. The cinematography is truly gorgeous, and reminded me how little of the South American landscape we ever see on film in the U.S. The cinematographer has pulled off a major feat in shooting a period film in slightly grainy, sometimes shaky hand-held. No crane shots or sepia tinting here-the film quality immerses you in Guevara and Granado's experiences and makes them feel very immediate, without sacrificing any sense of history. A film like this is long overdue, and it deserves wide distribution. While the plot revolves around Che's awakening to the social struggles of South America (which are ongoing) there is a rich sense of place, and people, and beauty here. It seems to me that this is the first South American film in a few years that is not a world-weary documentary about social or political problems (and U.S. involvement in them), to open in the U.S. market. It's about the life of Che, yes, but it doesn't forget the people and problems that lead him into political activity, and will hopefully inspire viewers to pay more attention to what is going on around them, not only in Buenos Aires, Cuzco, Havana or Chiapas, but right next door.
71 out of 84 people found the following comment useful :-
REVALATORY A REVOLUCIONARY, 5 October 2004
Author: george.schmidt (george.schmidt@hbo.com) from fairview, nj
THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES (2004) ***1/2 Gael Garcia Bernal,
Rodrigo De la Serna, Mia Maestro. (Dir: Walter Salles)
Che Guevera is sadly best known today as a mysterious icon for a pop culture ironic t-shirt sported by the supposedly hip and political. Few, including this reviewer, really knew much more about the firebrand revolutionist who was a comrade in Cuban arms with Fidel Castro in a crusade that led to his eventual capture and execution by the CIA as a notorious fly-in-the-ointment career criminal.
However new insight albeit a few shades of grey and free styling dramatic license intact depicts a twenty something medical student named Ernesto Guevera da la Serna, a South American native (memorably portrayed by the ever soulful Bernal, in a truly outstanding breakthrough performance) who partners with his best friend Alberto Granado (strongly supportive De la Serna) on a trek by motorcycle (a battered 1939 Norton to be exact) an 800 plus mile quest from Argentina up thru the upper regions of Peru with nothing but a few provisions and even less dinero.
Relying on their bonhomie, make-shift surroundings and clever improvisation the odd couple manage to get to Ernesto's girlfriend's nouveau riche family where he tells the lovely Chichina Ferreyra (the fetching Maestro) that he wants her to wait for him but knows in his heart this is more than likely never to be.
After several humorous encounters along the fray the duo finally have to give up their trusty vehicle after many hardships and torrential weather obstacles to go on foot then finally on ferry to their destination: an internship with a leper colony. Along the way the duo meet many disenfranchised and impoverished fellow countrymen and their women and families and with each soul-crushing pit-stop you can feel the stirrings of ire catching fire within the young man who will become Che Guevera.
Salles, who directed the exceptional CENTRAL STATION, smartly allows his two fine actors plenty of room to get into the skins of their funny, fighting and deep souled characters while enlisting the picturesque surroundings of the lush and jaw-droppingly beautiful playas, mountains and countryside (exquisitely rendered by ace cinematographer Eric Gautier) and underlies the proceedings with a hauntingly stirring score by Gustavo Santaolalla.
But it is Bernal who is most powerful in his implosive, soulful and heartfelt turn as the young impassioned man just about to break for greatness; the same can be said of this talented actor's star bursting career.
57 out of 63 people found the following comment useful :-
Humanism, Awareness, Coming of Age: The Soul of Revolution, 26 November 2004
Author: gradyharp from United States
THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES is certainly one of the finest films of the year - a daring, compassionate re-creation of the journey of two young, well-to-do Argentinean lads who leave their privileged positions of biochemist and fourth year Medical student to follow their idea of traveling by motorcycle from their native Buenos Aires down to Patagonia, up through Chile, Peru, Colombia to Venezuela. Sounds like a light hearted Trip Movie, but instead this journey, factually made by one Ernesto (aka 'Che' and 'Fuser') Guevara de la Serna and his close friend Alberto Granado ('Chubby'), is one of the most touching and sensitive passages into self acceptance and awareness of the world as a place where equality of people is a microscopic speck of illusion that is revealed by a carefully constructed script by Jose Rivera based on the diaries of both of these men made during and after their journey. Walter Salles ("Behind the Sun", "Central Station") once again proves himself a director who can infuse his vision of a story with uncomplicated directness of approach, having the sensitivity to allow his well-chosen actors to create wholly believable, three-dimensional characters, whether the actors are the leads or simply minor roles that hold the camera's eye for seconds.
Taken as simply a movie to enjoy, THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES is as beautiful as a National Geographic Magazine feature on the Amazon and the deserted and populated lands of South America. But given his re-creation of Che Guevara's and Alberto Granado's meaningful excursion into manhood this movie goes far beyond entertainment and enters that rarefied arena of psycho biography. Traveling on an old motorcycle, the two lads encounter hunger, accidents, lusting after women at every stop, ingratiating panhandling, and the gradual revelation of the quality of life of the indigenous peoples of South America. They are touched by the plights of the people, the people in turn love the boys, and they eventually spend three weeks living and working in a leprosarium run by the nuns, adding their knowledge of medicine to helping not only the physical needs of the lepers but finding ways to break the psychosocial ostracism that historically curses the 'unclean'. Breaking down these barriers, forming strong relationships with those tending the lepers as well as the lepers themselves, lays the seeds of 'revolution' or Change in the minds of the lads, especially Ernesto or 'Che'. The film does not begin to preach or to make the Che Guevara of Cuban militancy fame a hero: it doesn't have to, as the transformation in the mind of Che is so beautifully subtle. The journey has given him the insight that he must devote himself to changing the inequality and poverty of his America. The events that followed this Motorcycle journey are provided in voice over, black and white footage of people's faces, and a final scene in Havana at the ending of the film. No more need be said.
Gael Garcia Bernal gives an incredibly thoughtful, stunning portrayal of Che, saying so much more with his eyes, his body language (especially as he suffers through his own physical demon of asthma attacks), and his perfect embodiment of the spirit of a man who becomes enlightened by the peasants he comes to love. Bernal is already a brilliant actor and a magnetic screen presence, and if he is not nominated for an Oscar for this unique, artful role it will be a major surprise. His is a career to watch! Likewise Rodrigo de la Serna is completely immersed in his role as Alberto and shows the same quality of quiet growth as a character as the movie progresses. ALL of the many extras in this huge cast are memorable: the leper colony abounds with some of the most touching human beings ever captured on film. The camera work, the musical scoring, the obvious commitment on the part of everyone involved in this glorious picture - every aspect of THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES is exactly right. Ten Stars for this one! In Spanish with English subtitles
47 out of 60 people found the following comment useful :-

Excellent Film, Deserves Award, 14 November 2004
Author: dreams_sahara from California
The Motorcycle Diaries is a tale of Che's life prior to becoming a revolutionary political figure. We follow Che and his friend on a cross-country road trip, a journey into the unknown. The film was beautifully filmed. It really makes you want to travel and go to see some of the South/Central American countries.
The acting was superb. Gael Garcia Bernal is not new to the screen. He has delivered amazing performances in both Amores Perros and Y Tu Mama Tambien. He does not disappoint in this movie. Newcomer, Rodrigo De La Serna, also gives an excellent performance.
Regardless of your politics and personal views of Che, you will walk away from this movie feeling a bit better about humanity.
I'm hoping this pulls Best Foreign Oscar.
43 out of 60 people found the following comment useful :-

8/10, 11 November 2004
Author: desperateliving from Canada
I am not a student of Che Guevara; I saw this because, like many people, I find Guevara to be an interesting, charismatic character. And I find Bernal to be just as charismatic an actor, so it doesn't bother me that this film doesn't focus on politics -- this is not an incitement to revolution, this is a road movie about a character who happened to become a legend later in life. (It may just as well have been about someone who would later become a social worker.) The entire film is unassuming and understated, and as it goes along it achieves what might be called a pleasant dullness in tone. It's not boring or flat -- we're constantly involved with these two characters -- but it's also not some stinging, brilliant piece of movie-making. This isn't a director trying to show off his stuff. The film works basically according to road movie rules: our characters bump into other characters on their long and winding journey, there's sex and love, and the whole thing is geared toward a self-discovery. But the film wisely doesn't tell us what, exactly, Guevara discovers; it relies on the events (a group of miners treated like cattle; lepers treated like, well, lepers) to let us surmise what that will be. And it's an especially nice touch, I think, that the film itself is as dedicated to people as Che is within the film. (Witness the final scenes.)
I think Bernal's presence in film right now is tremendously important. I don't think it's too much of an exaggeration to say that he is to Latin America what Alain Delon was to French cinema in the '60s. (What other foreign language actor can inspire 13-year-old American girls to seek out a film by Almodovar?) He's terrific here as a presence and as a character. It's a character very scripted -- when he shakes the hands of a leper without gloves, it's meant to be an Important Moment -- but Bernal manages to capture the essence of something larger. That may be due simply to his looks: he has a gorgeous skin tone, and he emanates a kind of golden brown hue. When he smiles, his snout upturned, it shatters any possibility of labeling his performance as mannered. It's never show-offy or unpleasant to watch; he inhabits his character so smoothly that you don't notice it -- it's totally natural. He plays a character with a romantic sickness, as well, to add something to his aura. (He has a kind of intense asthma; basically, he breathes heavily and looks like he's dying, not unlike Val Kilmer in "Tombstone.")
Enjoyable as the film often is -- and it's certainly a beautifully-made film; the soundtrack and the locations and cinematography are very nice -- you sometimes wish that the director could somehow manage to infuse the film with a passionate Spanish narrative and still keep the clean, unsentimental atmosphere that he creates. 8/10
39 out of 57 people found the following comment useful :-
A Politically Thoughtful and Pretty Grand Tour of South America, 15 October 2004
Author: noralee from Queens, NY
"The Motorcycle Diaries" (Diarios de motocicleta) works more effectively as a bio-pic than on its own as a road movie.
The scenery throughout Latin America is beautiful and the two leads are very affecting, especially Gael García Bernal as Ernesto Guevara de la Serna when "Che" is still nascent.
But it's surprising how undramatic what happens that turns a sweet, middle-class med student into a revolutionary. He was already a liberal who wanted to help leprosy patients, so what happens isn't a complete turn-around -- even when they are broke, they can wire home for more money. Rather it sets off an internal thoughtfulness that is difficult to catch on film.
Mostly just leaving his sheltered life, particularly being dropped by his wealthy girlfriend, and seeing the continent, especially his first exposure to the indigenous peoples who suffer the most in every South American country even while tourists are visiting the ruins of their ancestors, becomes the nexus of his pan-continental political ideals.
He is mostly an observer and inconsistent protester of injustice, not a victim -- it's startling that his culminating noble sojourn at the leper colony, where he can put his skills and indivisible warmth to specific good, is only for three weeks.
So there's no eye-opening "Grapes of Wrath" conflict, though he is always contrasted with his carefree companion, Alberto Granado. Their close camaraderie is well-captured and Ernesto has a profound impact on him, as we learn in a final biographical summary.
It is amusing that Ernesto contradicts the stereotype of the Latin male sensualist and is a terrible dancer to the lovely soundtrack.
24 out of 37 people found the following comment useful :-

A personal journey, 15 September 2004
Author: carlos.virgile-3 from London,England
Why a film about Che now? Why suddenly a revival of a revolutionary hero?
Apathy, political blandness and complacency are the characteristics of today's world when compare with the 60's generation, and any left revolutionary dogma seems, for many reasons, to have been put at rest for the time being and until further notice. The relevance of this film today has many different facets and its success is particularly interesting at a moment of change, when wars, political and economical crisis and their global effects, are starting to provoke some reaction suggesting that involvement might just be around the corner. Wisely the film concentrates on following Guevara diaries before becoming radicalised and in the process of gaining knowledge and awareness of the struggle of the Latin American unprivileged classes and prior to breaking up with his middle class ties. The film has had many viewers that have criticized the lack of a stronger political definition in the portrait of the lead character, a more radical view of Guevara and of its political stand even at that early stage in his life. The film makes his image more digestible for a general audience, showing him in a sympathetic light and from a softer perspective. In my view this is exactly what it makes it relevant and interesting for today's audiences. Although the film grows in the memory as being a touch more political than what perhaps Walter Salles aimed for, it doesn't intend to preach politics or even try to be a full-blown biopic of an historical and controversial figure. What makes the message strong is the fact that we actually know who the character eventually will become after the story of the film finishes and the end titles start to run, that makes it rather more poignant. We only witness the beginning of his personal journey and know how much he will travel. The film is more about personal choices, experiences and decisions that eventually might change the course of a life, and particularly about the spirit of being young. The film recreates the freedom of adolescence, a time for absorbing and experimenting, the start of a trek where we discover the world and where justice and a hope for change is strongly embedded with the attitude of the young. Or at least that happen in the 60's generally and particularly in Latin America. The real quality of the film is that through a subtle, engaging, fun tale allows the audience to connect with a period where change, personal and internal, was possible, and where there was hope for a fairer future.
For anyone like myself from Argentina, part of a generation that were there and young at the time, the film evokes just that starting point. It is a rather emotional journey that takes back a whole generation that had firm beliefs in these ideals, as relevant today as they were in 1952 where the action of the film ends and Guevara flights back home shaken by the whole travel experience. It is rather significant that not that much has changed for the better in the Latin America of today, where the gap between the 'haves' and the 'have nots' has, if anything, grown wider. The film is simple and straightforward showing the real talent of Walter Salles for avoiding patronising his audience as he conveys an accurate portrait of the landscape and its people. There is perhaps some excessive 'under acting' on the approach from Gael Garcia Bernal to his performance [ ...was Che really ever such a "softie"?] but still, it is great to see him growing as an actor and as Che through the film. To counter balanced such a restrained interpretation, Rodrigo de la Serna projects the right dosage of charm and Argentinean street wisdom that gives the warmth and humanity the film exudes. The music of Gustavo Santaolaya adds a layer of depth and intensity whilst rightly avoiding, like the rest of the film, most of the traditional clichés of the South American image.
12 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :-

Sheer brilliance, 8 August 2006
Author: Stampsfightclub from United Kingdom
From director Walter Salles comes a very moving road journey which had me completely spellbound by the end and I'm sure would gain many viewer's hearts as the infamous director dives deep into many different issues.
The story centres around two young doctors going on a motorbike journey around the world, not for personal gain but for the experience. This idea was completely outstanding. It gives the audience an understanding of young people's desires, not for personal gains such as money but for an experience into real life issues and wishing to know more about the world around them. These ideas I'm sure would make viewers aspire to be like the central characters to go out and explore the world and that was a reason why I personally loved this drama, because it gives inspiration to the audience and really moves them in a way which will leave you completely spellbound.
The film centres on many issues but one which stuck out for me was the heavy ideologies of health. In the year 1950 there were many health issues present in the poorer counties such as Peru and this Oscar winning drama is able to capture these issues magnificently. The two central protagonists are doctors and are wishing to help others with their knowledge and expertise as they explore the less fortunate countries to help with the many depressing health problems the countries are experiencing. There is a very highly emotional driven scene when the lead character tries to help a very ill woman who is refusing to be treated. Tensions are always running high in the latter stages of the film when many issues are wishing to be resolved and the central protagonists are putting themselves on the line to help the ill residents of the poor countries.
Having changes in situations was a very powerful technique. The characters experience a poor life and a rich life. Audiences will see different perspectives of life in the 1950s when seeing there are poor and rich countries and are divided by the smallest differences, such as illnesses. We also see more joyous moments and highly emotional driven scenes which also gives a sense of how life is, the good and bad sides are both expressed in equal amounts which in my opinion was a fantastic move and will capture your heart as it did mine
Centred on the 1950s the film captured the essence of the politically driven time beautifully. Audiences see job issues, money problems and country matters which all juxtapose perfectly to capture the essence of the time and crate a high realism in context of the time
The acting by everyone involved is absolutely outstanding and it confused me when not one received an Oscar nomination because Gael Garcia Bernal and Rodrigo De la Serna are remarkable as the two travellers. Both dealing with their own issues we see different types of characters but similar characteristics to which made the film more believable of society where opinions are divided but also shared.
Bernal plays a character who is always saying what he feels and is never wishing to back down from anyone or anything and he pulled it off tremendously. The passion he creates as the central protagonist Guevara is utterly astonishing as he deals with asthma problems, love lives and money issues. It's a lot for him to take as he realises how serious life can be. Serna to also pulls off a classic performance as the older more experienced of the two who is always looking for that little bit more than his fellow traveller.
Using different countries such as Peru, Venezuela, and Spain allows viewers to gain an insight into the vastness of life. Using poor countries as well as rich countries allows viewers to see different sides to the world in the 1950s and was pulled off greatly. The characters can therefore experience what a posh life is like as well as what life in the fast lane gives them. The camera work is astonishing. Shooting from Venezuela, Peru etc we see different perspective of the countries. The scenery is always beautiful with shots of the towns in a poor state and the general background of the countries is to be admired. The shots of the bike on the roads are to be admired. The camera moves adjacent to the bike giving the realistic effect of the bike moving fast along the empty roads, gaining a sense of freedom and enjoyment.
From watching this film I can say I have been inspired to get on a motorbike and explore the world. Seeing what the central protagonists saw will inspire many as it has inspired me and I have no hesitation in recommending this Oscar winning drama to anyone.
Add another comment
Related Links