IMDb >
Rachel's Attic (2002)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsRachel's Attic (2002) More at IMDbPro »
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
16 July 2002 (USA) moreTagline:
Look Away... If you Can.Plot:
After returning home from a two week trial in Chicago, Rachel Bishop (Rachel Nord) finds her sister Emily Bishop (Nancy Walters) missing... more | add synopsisUser Comments:
The Single Worst Movie of the Decade.....A Talentless Piece of Trash moreCast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Rachel Nord | ... | Rachel Bishop | |
| Nancy Walters | ... | Emily Bishop | |
| Alicia Bewernitz | ... | Simone | |
| Devin McPherson | ... | Freddie | |
| Alex Alexander | ... | Johnathon Kipplinger | |
| Dan Welcher | ... | Christopher | |
| Kathy Gauthier | ... | Claire | |
| Gunnar Hansen | ... | Ronald | |
| Karl Sinclair | ... | Executioner | |
| Keith Jamerson | ... | Gatty (scenes deleted) | |
| Bill Laing | ... | Keith | |
| Steve Lucev | ... | Orlando | |
| Judith Ellis | ... | Janice | |
| Abigail Shah | ... | Young Rachel | |
| Jakie Olson | ... | Young Emily |
Additional Details
MPAA:
Rated R for violence, sexual content and language. (director's cut)Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsRuntime:
112 minCountry:
USALanguage:
EnglishColor:
ColorFilming Locations:
Detroit, Michigan, USAFun Stuff
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Rachel's Attic (2002)Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| The Secret of Treasure Island | The Seventh Victim | The General's Daughter | Beverly Hills Cop | Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Drama section | IMDb USA section | Add this title to MyMovies |


I sometimes enjoy really lousy movies....those that occasionally result when people (even talented people) get together with good intentions to produce a movie and for whatever reason it turns out to be a disaster. Movies like "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes", "Plan 9 from Outer Space", "Manos-Hands of Fate", and "Heavens Gate", etc.
So, when I heard that this movie, "Rachel's Attic", was considered by many people to be the single worst film of the decade, naturally I just HAD to see it.
Boy, do I regret that decision. This movie is beyond bad....it is SO bad that it is not even as enjoyable as the usual bad movie. The acting, filming, script, etc. are even worse than a low budget porno film: the sound is utterly horrible, the "plot" is completely incomprehensible, the "acting" is laughable....it is a complete waste of everyone's time and money. At least the porno film has porno to break up the monotony, while this ridiculous nightmare has a guy squeezing a rotten apple, and a "mad hatter's" tea party.
The lighting is non-existent...many "scenes" take place in semi or complete darkness, which is probably just as well. The "writer-director" (I use the terms loosely), David Tybor, tries to get kinky with bondage scenes...but the results would be laughable, if they weren't so pathetic. There is some nudity, but it is of such abysmal quality that it actually acts as a sexual suppressant. I could go on forever and not do justice to all the flaws and shortcomings of this truly awful waste of film.
For the love of god, avoid this train wreck. I know that despite (or perhaps because of) my negative comments, you may still be tempted to see if this piece of trash is really as bad as I claim it to be....but trust me on this....it's even worse than I have said, and you will absolutely, positively regret the experience (and expense, if you waste your money on a purchase or rental).