Home
| Search
| Now Playing
| News
| My Movies
| Games
| Boards
| Help
| US Movie Showtimes
| Top 250
| Register
| Recommendations
| Widgets
Box Office
| Index
| Trailers
| Jobs
|
IMDbPro.com - Free Trial
| IMDb Resume
Copyright © 1990-2008
IMDb.com, Inc.
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
An
company.
Advertise on IMDb.
License our content.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglinestrailers and videospostersphoto galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
New York at the Movies (2002) (TV)
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-
Ignores too much of the top flight., 5 March 2003
Author: rsoonsa (rsoonsa@bandbbooks.com) from Mountain Mesa, California
This documentary is essentially a paean to New York City rather than an attempt at a comprehensive overview of films based there, and is restricted to a rather limited grouping of movies and performers who appear repeatedly, thereby neglecting a raft of major works from both the silent era and modern cinema, resulting in a curiously inbred feeling amid the Gothamite encomia. After a brief introduction by Meryl Streep, we are in store for a formulaic series of talking trunks interspersed with filmic samples, moving and elsewise, Peter Bogdanovich offering the most interesting and informed comments relating to historical makers of cinema, while Sidney Lumet also contributes something of value, whereas such as Tim Robbins, Liza Minelli and starry eyed Nora Ephron are primarily steeped in urbanite proselytism. The initial portion of this visual anthology is the most impressive and the film should be seen by cineastes because of it, although Hollywood's sets are ironically more striking than is the intent, and an ongoing litany regarding the value of New York locations is, as a result, unconvincing, while the editing, although skillful, provides a tiresome glut of repetitious and unidentified stills where short and more variegated clips from a vast reservoir would have been more useful and stimulating.
0 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-
it had too many films mentioned, 4 September 2004
Author: Myrna T from Sydney
it was to hard to follow as it had to many films mentioned...it was also very repetitive and Meryl Streep was emotionless and dull through out the duration of the documentary. there should have been more mention of 9/11 and its effect...it would have been much better if it had more focus on recent movies that explored the vertical and horizontal NY. such movies as "Down with love" and "Inderpendance Day" were not mentioned however they both show NY in the movies... there were a lot of movies being presented but it seemed like it was an effort to try waste time as many of them did not have any meaning. it should have been re thought and presented in a more entertaining way
Add another comment
Related Links