MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 500 this week

Dragon Fighter (2003)

Video  -  Action | Sci-Fi | Thriller  -  4 January 2003 (USA)
3.3
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 3.3/10 from 894 users  
Reviews: 49 user | 16 critic

Workers in an underground lab fight for their lives against a cloned dragon they created.

Director:

Writers:

(screenplay), (screenplay)
Watch Trailer
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 47 titles
created 07 Aug 2011
 
a list of 746 titles
created 11 Nov 2011
 
a list of 3939 titles
created 05 Jan 2012
 
a list of 21 titles
created 08 Nov 2012
 
a list of 436 titles
created 15 Nov 2012
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Dragon Fighter (Video 2003)

Dragon Fighter (Video 2003) on IMDb 3.3/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Dragon Fighter.

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Capt. David Carver
Kristine Byers ...
Dr. Meredith Winter
...
Dr. Ian Drackovitch
Marcus Aurelius ...
Dr. Greg Travis
...
Kevin Korisch
Vesela Dimitrova ...
Bailey Kent (as Vassela Dimitrova)
Hristo Shopov ...
Capt. Sergei Petrov
Chuck Eckert ...
Cookie
Kelly Wilborn ...
Dying Mother
Hector Kleist ...
Knight #1
John Barnsall ...
Knight #2
Chad Boyer ...
Knight #3
Matthew Coe ...
Knight #4
Matt Harris ...
Knight #5
Darius Kerns ...
Knight #6
Edit

Storyline

A group of scientists, working in a deep underground lab, clones and hatches a 1,000-year-old dragon, after finding its remains in a cavern in southern England. After the critter goes from one cell to full grown in 3 hours, it goes on a rampage, killing most of the scientists and escaping to the surface. Naturally, bullets don't faze it at all. Our Intrepid Hero helps kill if before it can menace all mankind. Sort of "Alien" meets "Reign of Fire". Written by fgunther

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

There can be only one dominant species.


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for language | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

4 January 2003 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Dragon Fighter  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The split screens were added in the edit as an attempt to make the "talking heads" scenes more interesting. See more »

Goofs

There is a fusion explosion in the lab, with power half the Hiroshima bomb. After it's exploded, rescuers find another lab just 30 meters below explosion point. The lab is still quite operational, and even the second dragon is alive and well. See more »

Crazy Credits

No animals, including dragons, were injured in the making of this motion picture. See more »

Connections

Referenced in The Sugarcube Critic: Dragonshy (2014) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Not terrible, but scientifically flawed
26 March 2003 | by (Missouri) – See all my reviews

I really wanted to like this movie, and i was entertained to a point. But, there are tons of things very wrong with this movie.

There is a very annoying split-screen style that occurs every so often during the movie, showing different camera angles of the scenes. Inventive yes, but i found it quite distracting and just plain annoying to watch it in that fashion.

Another thing is the cloning of the "Dragon" so rapidly. How could something go from a single DNA strand into a multi-ton beast within a few hours? Let's forget that it is basically scientifically impossible, but where was it going to get so much raw organic material to produce that level of exponential growth? This isn't the first time in a movie that they've leaped over the seemingly obvious scientific facts, hoping that the dummies out there wouldn't care or notice.

The ending was equally as troublesome, military airplanes shooting down the Dragon? That reminds me of what happened in the horrible movie "Retillian". At the very end we see soldiers (or scientists) exploring the underground facility which was blown up by a Nuclear core meltdown that was 53% of Hiroshima, right after our heroes escaped. When the soldiers go in, the facility only appears to be mildly damaged...how they could even go into it at all is beyond me.

Anything positive about the film? Well, the beginning of the movie that takes place during medieval times is decent, and the Dragon CGI effects are fairly believable except for a few scenes. The acting is admirable, but that in and of itself fails to help the weak plot.

This is far from the worst film i've ever seen, but i wouldn't recommend it or give a seal of approval. It's worth a single viewing for fans of sci-fi movies, but for everyone else...just forget Dragon Fighter.


7 of 9 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Hilarious pete-r
New Title? n-schwager
Recycled. andersont-1
Syfy Worthy oldmotem
Best movie ever? Cral9000
Discuss Dragon Fighter (2003) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?